Environmental impact Assessment in the panela production process through the Life Cycle Analysis

被引:0
作者
Quezada-Moreno, W. F. [1 ]
Quezada-Torres, W. D. [2 ]
Proano-Molina, M. [3 ]
Mora-Gutierrez, M. [1 ]
Vivas-Vivas, M. [1 ]
Jimenez-Sanchez, A. [1 ]
Gonzalez-Suarez, E. [2 ]
Molina-Borja, F. [4 ]
Zambrano-Ochoa, Z. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guayaquil UG, Fac Ciencias Agr, Guayaquil, Ecuador
[2] Univ Tecnol Empresarial Guayaquil UTEG, Fac Posgrad & Invest, Guayaquil, Ecuador
[3] Univ Amer UDLA, Fac Posgrad, Quito, Ecuador
[4] Univ Cent Las Villas, Fac Ingn Quim, Santa Clara, Cuba
关键词
panela industry; environmental impact; sustainability; ecoindicator;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The panela activity is dispersed in all the country in production units and the linkage productive of the agroindustry from the cultivation of sugar cane, process and commercialization are affected by unfriendly and inefficient productions. The aim of the research was to analyze the environmental impact of panela production by using the Life Cycle Analysis in the different phases of the product's life as an alternative for identifying and solving environmental problems and as a technologically sustainable experience for the development of the panela sector. The cultivation and process are evaluated through the input and output of materials and negative environmental effects according to the categories of impact in health areas, ecosystem and global warming by using the environmental modeling of the SimaPro7 software and as impact methodology the eco-indicator 99. Incorporate sustainable technological improvements, good agricultural and manufacturing practices, with the intervention of the government, the industry and the university, are viable options to mitigate the impacts caused by this agrobusiness.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 67
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
CEPAL, 2013, ACC INF PART JUST TE
[2]  
Colon Jorda J., 2016, GUIAS METODOLOGICAS
[3]  
Das S, 2010, WOODHEAD PUBL MATER, P309, DOI 10.1533/9781845697822.2.309
[4]  
Della Torre V., 2018, CAMPO I D I ANALISIS
[5]  
Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, 2002, LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMEN
[6]  
Ecologic Girona, COM APL FAC ENF CIRC
[7]  
El Haggar S.M., 2005, Environmental Solutions, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-012088441-4/50015-0
[8]  
EPA, 2017, BAS INF CARB MON CO
[9]  
EPA, 2017, PARTICULATEMATTER PM
[10]  
EPA, 2017, NITR DIOX NO2 POLL