Statistical Issues in Testing Conformance with the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA) Profile Claims

被引:26
作者
Obuchowski, Nancy A. [1 ]
Buckler, Andrew [2 ]
Kinahan, Paul [3 ]
-Mayer, Heather Chen [4 ]
Petrick, Nicholas [5 ]
Barboriak, Daniel P. [6 ]
Bullen, Jennifer [1 ]
Barnhart, Huiman [6 ]
Sullivan, Daniel C. [6 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Quantitat Hlth Sci, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Elucid Bioimaging Inc, Wenham, MA USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Radiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] NIST, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[5] US FDA, CDRH, Silver Spring, MD USA
[6] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
关键词
QIBA; quantitative imaging biomarker; precision; repeatability; bias; total deviation index; linearity; TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2015.12.020
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A major initiative of the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance is to develop standards-based documents called "Profiles," which describe one or more technical performance claims for a given imaging modality. The term "actor" denotes any entity (device, software, or person) whose performance must meet certain specifications for the claim to be met. The objective of this paper is to present the statistical issues in testing actors' conformance with the specifications. In particular, we present the general rationale and interpretation of the claims, the minimum requirements for testing whether an actor achieves the performance requirements, the study designs used for testing conformity, and the statistical analysis plan. We use three examples to illustrate the process: apparent diffusion coefficient in solid tumors measured by MRI, change in Perc 15 as a biomarker for the progression of emphysema, and percent change in solid tumor volume by computed tomography as a biomarker for lung cancer progression.
引用
收藏
页码:496 / 506
页数:11
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Scan-rescan variability in perfusion assessment of tumors in MRI using both model and data-derived arterial input functions [J].
Ashton, Edward ;
Raunig, David ;
Ng, Chaan ;
Kelcz, Fredrick ;
McShane, Teresa ;
Evelhoch, Jeffrey .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2008, 28 (03) :791-796
[2]   Applications of the Repeatability of Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers: A Review of Statistical Analysis of Repeat Data Sets [J].
Barnhart, Huiman X. ;
Barboriak, Daniel P. .
TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 2 (04) :231-235
[3]   MORE ON UNBIASED ESTIMATION OF STANDARD DEVIATION [J].
BOLCH, BW .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1968, 22 (03) :27-&
[4]   A Collaborative Enterprise for Multi-Stakeholder Participation in the Advancement of Quantitative Imaging [J].
Buckler, Andrew J. ;
Bresolin, Linda ;
Dunnick, N. Reed ;
Sullivan, Daniel C. .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 258 (03) :906-914
[5]  
Dixon W.J., 1983, Introduction to Statistical Analysis, V4th
[6]   Meta-analysis of the technical performance of an imaging procedure: Guidelines and statistical methodology [J].
Huang, Erich P. ;
Wang, Xiao-Feng ;
Choudhury, Kingshuk Roy ;
McShane, Lisa M. ;
Goenen, Mithat ;
Ye, Jingjing ;
Buckler, Andrew J. ;
Kinahan, Paul E. ;
Reeves, Anthony P. ;
Jackson, Edward F. ;
Guimaraes, Alexander R. ;
Zahlmann, Gudrun .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (01) :141-174
[7]   The emerging science of quantitative imaging biomarkers terminology and definitions for scientific studies and regulatory submissions [J].
Kessler, Larry G. ;
Barnhart, Huiman X. ;
Buckler, Andrew J. ;
Choudhury, Kingshuk Roy ;
Kondratovich, Marina V. ;
Toledano, Alicia ;
Guimaraes, Alexander R. ;
Filice, Ross ;
Zhang, Zheng ;
Sullivan, Daniel C. .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (01) :9-26
[8]   Statistical issues in the comparison of quantitative imaging biomarker algorithms using pulmonary nodule volume as an example [J].
Obuchowski, Nancy A. ;
Barnhart, Huiman X. ;
Buckler, Andrew J. ;
Pennello, Gene ;
Wang, Xiao-Feng ;
Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree ;
Kim, Hyun J. ;
Reeves, Anthony P. .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (01) :107-140
[9]   Quantitative imaging biomarkers: A review of statistical methods for computer algorithm comparisons [J].
Obuchowski, Nancy A. ;
Reeves, Anthony P. ;
Huang, Erich P. ;
Wang, Xiao-Feng ;
Buckler, Andrew J. ;
Kim, Hyun J. ;
Barnhart, Huiman X. ;
Jackson, Edward F. ;
Giger, Maryellen L. ;
Pennello, Gene ;
Toledano, Alicia Y. ;
Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree ;
Apanasovich, Tatiyana V. ;
Kinahan, Paul E. ;
Myers, Kyle J. ;
Goldgof, Dmitry B. ;
Barboriak, Daniel P. ;
Gillies, Robert J. ;
Schwartz, Lawrence H. ;
Sullivan, Daniel C. .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (01) :68-106
[10]   Comparison of 1D, 2D, and 3D Nodule Sizing Methods by Radiologists for Spherical and Complex Nodules on Thoracic CT Phantom Images [J].
Petrick, Nicholas ;
Kim, Hyun J. Grace ;
Clunie, David ;
Borradaile, Kristin ;
Ford, Robert ;
Zeng, Rongping ;
Gavrielides, Marios A. ;
McNitt-Gray, Michael F. ;
Lu, Z. Q. John ;
Fenimore, Charles ;
Zhao, Binsheng ;
Buckler, Andrew J. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2014, 21 (01) :30-40