The Impact of Rapid On-Site Evaluation on the Quality and Diagnostic Value of Thyroid Nodule Fine-Needle Aspirations

被引:15
|
作者
Muri, Raphaela [1 ,2 ]
Trippel, Mafalda [3 ]
Borner, Urs [4 ]
Weidner, Sabine [5 ,6 ]
Trepp, Roman [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Dept Diabet Endocrinol Nutr Med & Metab, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, Grad Sch Hlth Sci, Bern, Switzerland
[3] Univ Bern, Inst Pathol, Bern, Switzerland
[4] Univ Bern, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Bern, Switzerland
[5] Bern Univ Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
[6] Univ Bern, Bern, Switzerland
[7] Univ Bern, Bern Univ Hosp, Dept Diabet Endocrinol Med & Metab, Inselspital, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
Bethesda system; cytology; histology; rapid on-site evaluation; thyroid nodules; ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration; ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT; BETHESDA SYSTEM; ONSITE EVALUATION; CYTOPATHOLOGY; CYTOLOGY; FNA;
D O I
10.1089/thy.2021.0551
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is the preferred method to evaluate the dignity of thyroid nodules. Nevertheless, the often-reported high nondiagnostic rate burdens affected patients and the health care system. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) constitutes an addition to the thyroid FNA procedure, with various studies showing its beneficial effect on the Bethesda I nondiagnostic rate. We aimed to assess whether ROSE may reduce the rate of Bethesda categories III and V. Additionally, we examined the influence of ROSE on specimen quality.Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study, comparing Bethesda categorization and specimen quality in specimens subject to ROSE compared with those not subject to ROSE. We also evaluated aspects of specimen quality that differed according to the use of ROSE. We subcategorized Bethesda I into insufficient cellularity or artifacts, and Bethesda categories III and V into cellular without artifacts, sparsely cellular, or artifacts.Results: We evaluated 5030 thyroid FNAs. ROSE was performed in 1304 (25.9%) cases, and ROSE was not utilized for 3726 (74.1%) specimens. The rate of Bethesda I nondiagnostic and Bethesda III categories was reduced in specimens subject to ROSE (4.3%, 56/1304) compared with non-ROSE (39.9%, 1487/3726, p < 0.001). The rate of both benign Bethesda II and malignant Bethesda VI diagnoses was 91.6% (1194/1270) in ROSE specimens compared with 56.6% (1999/3530) in non-ROSE (p < 0.001). This was reflected by a significant improvement in diagnostic accuracy with ROSE (areas under the curve [AUC](non-ROSE) = 0.811, AUC(ROSE) = 0.895, p = 0.004). The overall rate of specimens flawed by sparse cellularity in Bethesda categories III and V was 0.1% (1/1304) in ROSE specimens compared with 1.2% (45/3726) in non-ROSE (p < 0.001). The overall artifact rate was 0.3% (4/1304) for ROSE specimens and 2.5% (92/3726) for non-ROSE (p < 0.001).Conclusions: ROSE significantly increased diagnostic accuracy by improving FNA specimens quantitatively and qualitatively. We suggest considering ROSE as standard of care for thyroid FNAs.
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 674
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of Rapid On-Site Evaluation on Diagnostic Accuracy of Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration
    Fawcett, Celia
    Eppenberger-Castori, Serenella
    Zechmann, Stefan
    Hanke, Jasmin
    Herzog, Michelle
    Prince, Spasenija Savic
    Christ, Emanuel Remigius
    Ebrahimi, Fahim
    ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2022, 66 (05) : 371 - 378
  • [2] The impact of rapid on-site evaluation on thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy: A 2-year cancer center institutional experience
    Pastorello, Ricardo G.
    Destefani, Camila
    Pinto, Pedro H.
    Credidio, Caroline H.
    Reis, Rafael X.
    Rodrigues, Thiago de A.
    de Toledo, Maryane C.
    De Brot, Louise
    Costa, Felipe de A.
    do Nascimento, Antonio G.
    Pinto, Clovis A. L.
    Saieg, Mauro A.
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2018, 126 (10) : 846 - 852
  • [3] Value of rapid on-site evaluation for ultrasound-guided thyroid fine needle aspiration
    Jiang, Danni
    Zang, Yichen
    Jiang, Dandan
    Zhang, Xiaojuan
    Zhao, Cheng
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 47 (02) : 626 - 634
  • [4] Who Should Perform Rapid or On-Site Assessment of Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspirations?
    Stelow, Edward B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2012, 138 (01) : 8 - 9
  • [5] Value of biomedical scientists providing on-site specimen adequacy assessment for fine-needle aspirations
    Narine, N.
    Rana, D. N.
    Perera, D. M.
    Irshad, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 69 (03) : 108 - 111
  • [6] Impact of rapid on-site evaluation on diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: experience from a single center
    Guvendir, Irem
    Zemheri, Itir Ebru
    Ozdil, Kamil
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [7] When Is Rapid On-Site Evaluation Cost-Effective for Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy?
    Schmidt, Robert L.
    Walker, Brandon S.
    Cohen, Michael B.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):
  • [8] Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration versus fine-needle biopsy and impact of rapid on-site evaluation for pancreatic masses
    de Moura, Diogo T. H.
    McCarty, Thomas R.
    Jirapinyo, Pichamol
    Ribeiro, Igor B.
    Hathorn, Kelly E.
    Madruga-Neto, Antonio Coutinho
    Lee, Linda S.
    Thompson, Christopher C.
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2020, 8 (06) : E738 - E747
  • [9] Retrospective Evaluation of Instituted Standard Adequacy Criteria for On-Site Adequacy Assessment of Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration
    Jing, Xin
    Wey, Elizabeth
    Michael, Claire W.
    DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2011, 39 (06) : 391 - 394
  • [10] The value of repeating fine-needle aspiration for thyroid nodules
    Doubi, Aseel
    Alrayes, Nuha S.
    Alqubaisi, Abdulaziz K.
    Al-Dhahri, Saleh F.
    ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE, 2021, 41 (01) : 36 - 42