Automatic Prostate Gleason Grading Using Pyramid Semantic Parsing Network in Digital Histopathology

被引:10
作者
Qiu, Yali [1 ]
Hu, Yujin [1 ]
Kong, Peiyao [1 ]
Xie, Hai [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoliu [1 ]
Cao, Jiuwen [2 ]
Wang, Tianfu [1 ]
Lei, Baiying [1 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Biomed Engn, Natl Reg Key Technol Engn Lab Med Ultrasound,Guang, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[2] Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Key Lab Internet Things IOT & Informat Fus Technol, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
prostate; gleason grading; histopathology; PSPNet; pathology; SEGMENTATION; IMAGES;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2022.772403
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeProstate biopsy histopathology and immunohistochemistry are important in the differential diagnosis of the disease and can be used to assess the degree of prostate cancer differentiation. Today, prostate biopsy is increasing the demand for experienced uropathologists, which puts a lot of pressure on pathologists. In addition, the grades of different observations had an indicating effect on the treatment of the patients with cancer, but the grades were highly changeable, and excessive treatment and insufficient treatment often occurred. To alleviate these problems, an artificial intelligence system with clinically acceptable prostate cancer detection and Gleason grade accuracy was developed. MethodsDeep learning algorithms have been proved to outperform other algorithms in the analysis of large data and show great potential with respect to the analysis of pathological sections. Inspired by the classical semantic segmentation network, we propose a pyramid semantic parsing network (PSPNet) for automatic prostate Gleason grading. To boost the segmentation performance, we get an auxiliary prediction output, which is mainly the optimization of auxiliary objective function in the process of network training. The network not only includes effective global prior representations but also achieves good results in tissue micro-array (TMA) image segmentation. ResultsOur method is validated using 321 biopsies from the Vancouver Prostate Centre and ranks the first on the MICCAI 2019 prostate segmentation and classification benchmark and the Vancouver Prostate Centre data. To prove the reliability of the proposed method, we also conduct an experiment to test the consistency with the diagnosis of pathologists. It demonstrates that the well-designed method in our study can achieve good results. The experiment also focused on the distinction between high-risk cancer (Gleason pattern 4, 5) and low-risk cancer (Gleason pattern 3). Our proposed method also achieves the best performance with respect to various evaluation metrics for distinguishing benign from malignant. AvailabilityThe Python source code of the proposed method is publicly available at https://github.com/hubutui/Gleason. All implementation details are presented in this paper. ConclusionThese works prove that the Gleason grading results obtained from our method are effective and accurate.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: General pathologists [J].
Allsbrook, WC ;
Mangold, KA ;
Johnson, MH ;
Lane, RB ;
Lane, CG ;
Epstein, JI .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2001, 32 (01) :81-88
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, COMPUT RES REPOSITOR
[3]   Automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer tissue microarrays via deep learning [J].
Arvaniti, Eirini ;
Fricker, Kim S. ;
Moret, Michael ;
Rupp, Niels ;
Hermanns, Thomas ;
Fankhauser, Christian ;
Wey, Norbert ;
Wild, Peter J. ;
Ruschoff, Jan H. ;
Claassen, Manfred .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
[4]   SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentation [J].
Badrinarayanan, Vijay ;
Kendall, Alex ;
Cipolla, Roberto .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2017, 39 (12) :2481-2495
[5]  
Bailar J C 3rd, 1966, Cancer Chemother Rep, V50, P129
[6]   The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis [J].
Berg, Kasper D. ;
Thomsen, Frederik B. ;
Nerstrom, Camilla ;
Roder, Martin A. ;
Iversen, Peter ;
Toft, Birgitte G. ;
Vainer, Ben ;
Brasso, Klaus .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 117 (06) :883-889
[7]  
Betro B., 2000, LECT NOTES STAT, P273
[8]  
Bray F, 2018, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V68, P394, DOI [10.3322/caac.21492, 10.3322/caac.21609]
[9]   Artificial intelligence assistance significantly improves Gleason grading of prostate biopsies by pathologists [J].
Bulten, Wouter ;
Balkenhol, Maschenka ;
Belinga, Jean-Joel Awoumou ;
Brilhante, Americo ;
Cakir, Asli ;
Egevad, Lars ;
Eklund, Martin ;
Farre, Xavier ;
Geronatsiou, Katerina ;
Molinie, Vincent ;
Pereira, Guilherme ;
Roy, Paromita ;
Saile, Gunter ;
Salles, Paulo ;
Schaafsma, Ewout ;
Tschui, Joelle ;
Vos, Anne-Marie ;
van Boven, Hester ;
Vink, Robert ;
van der Laak, Jeroen ;
Hulsbergen-van der Kaa, Christina ;
Litjens, Geert .
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2021, 34 (03) :660-671
[10]   Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study [J].
Bulten, Wouter ;
Pinckaers, Hans ;
van Boven, Hester ;
Vink, Robert ;
de Bel, Thomas ;
van Ginneken, Bram ;
van der Laak, Jeroen ;
Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina ;
Litjens, Geert .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2020, 21 (02) :233-241