Opposing and following responses in sensorimotor speech control: Why responses go both ways

被引:27
作者
Franken, Matthias K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Acheson, Daniel J. [1 ,2 ]
McQueen, James M. [2 ,4 ]
Hagoort, Peter [1 ,2 ]
Eisner, Frank [4 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, Donders Ctr Cognit Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Ghent, Dept Expt Psychol, Henri Dunantlaan 2, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, Donders Ctr Cognit, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Speech production; Auditory feedback; Speech perception; Pitch; VOICE PITCH; FEEDBACK; F-0;
D O I
10.3758/s13423-018-1494-x
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
When talking, speakers continuously monitor and use the auditory feedback of their own voice to control and inform speech production processes. When speakers are provided with auditory feedback that is perturbed in real time, most of them compensate for this by opposing the feedback perturbation. But some responses follow the perturbation. In the present study, we investigated whether the state of the speech production system at perturbation onset may determine what type of response (opposing or following) is made. The results suggest that whether a perturbation-related response is opposing or following depends on ongoing fluctuations of the production system: The system initially responds by doing the opposite of what it was doing. This effect and the nontrivial proportion of following responses suggest that current production models are inadequate: They need to account for why responses to unexpected sensory feedback depend on the production system's state at the time of perturbation.
引用
收藏
页码:1458 / 1467
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Akagi M., 2000, P INTERSPEECH, P458
[2]  
Akagi M., 1998, P 5 INT C SPOK LANG, P1519
[3]   Opposing and following vocal responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback: Evidence for different mechanisms of voice pitch control [J].
Behroozmand, Roozbeh ;
Korzyukov, Oleg ;
Sattler, Lindsey ;
Larson, Charles R. .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2012, 132 (04) :2468-2477
[4]  
Boersma P., 2019, PRAAT DOING PHONETIC
[5]   Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback [J].
Burnett, TA ;
Freedland, MB ;
Larson, CR ;
Hain, TC .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1998, 103 (06) :3153-3161
[6]  
Cai S., 2008, P 8 INT SEM SPEECH P, P65
[7]   Reduced gamma-band coherence to distorted feedback during speech when what you say is not what you hear [J].
Ford, JM ;
Gray, M ;
Faustman, WO ;
Heink, TH ;
Mathalon, DH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 57 (02) :143-150
[8]   Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production [J].
Guenther, FH ;
Ghosh, SS ;
Tourville, JA .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2006, 96 (03) :280-301
[9]   Instructing subjects to make a voluntary response reveals the presence of two components to the audio-vocal reflex [J].
Hain, TC ;
Burnett, TA ;
Kiran, S ;
Larson, CR ;
Singh, S ;
Kenney, MK .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2000, 130 (02) :133-141
[10]   Computational neuroanatomy of speech production [J].
Hickok, Gregory .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 13 (02) :135-145