Cognitive radar antenna selection via deep learning

被引:71
作者
Elbir, Ahmet M. [1 ]
Mishra, Kumar Vijay [2 ]
Eldar, Yonina C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Duzce Univ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Duzce, Turkey
[2] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Andrew & Erna Viterbi Fac Elect Engn, Haifa, Israel
关键词
DOA ESTIMATION; WAVE-FORM; MIMO; ARRAYS; DESIGN; MUSIC;
D O I
10.1049/iet-rsn.2018.5438
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Direction-of-arrival (DoA) estimation of targets improves with the number of elements employed by a phased array radar antenna. Since larger arrays have high associated cost, area and computational load, there is a recent interest in thinning the antenna arrays without loss of far-field DoA accuracy. In this context, a cognitive radar may deploy a full array and then select an optimal subarray to transmit and receive the signals in response to changes in the target environment. Prior works have used optimisation and greedy search methods to pick the best subarrays cognitively. In this study, deep learning is leveraged to address the antenna selection problem. Specifically, they construct a convolutional neural network (CNN) as a multi-class classification framework, where each class designates a different subarray. The proposed network determines a new array every time data is received by the radar, thereby making antenna selection a cognitive operation. Their numerical experiments show that the proposed CNN structure provides 22% better classification performance than a support vector machine and the resulting subarrays yield 72% more accurate DoA estimates than random array selections.
引用
收藏
页码:871 / 880
页数:10
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Do Convolutional Neural Networks Learn Class Hierarchy?
    Alsallakh, Bilal
    Jourabloo, Amin
    Ye, Mao
    Liu, Xiaoming
    Ren, Liu
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS, 2018, 24 (01) : 152 - 162
  • [2] Optimization of element positions for direction finding with sparse arrays
    Athley, F
    [J]. 2001 IEEE WORKSHOP ON STATISTICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 516 - 519
  • [3] Solving the Spectrum Crisis
    Baylis, Charles
    Fellows, Matthew
    Cohen, Lawrence
    Marks, Robert J., II
    [J]. IEEE MICROWAVE MAGAZINE, 2014, 15 (05) : 94 - 107
  • [4] Cognitive Radar Framework for Target Detection and Tracking
    Bell, Kristine L.
    Baker, Christopher J.
    Smith, Graeme E.
    Johnson, Joel T.
    Rangaswamy, Muralidhar
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2015, 9 (08) : 1427 - 1439
  • [5] Cognitive waveform and receiver selection mechanism for multistatic radar
    Ben Kilani, Moez
    Nijsure, Yogesh
    Gagnon, Ghyslain
    Kaddoum, Georges
    Gagnon, Francois
    [J]. IET RADAR SONAR AND NAVIGATION, 2016, 10 (02) : 417 - 425
  • [6] A Lower Bound on the Bayesian MSE Based on the Optimal Bias Function
    Ben-Haim, Zvika
    Eldar, Yonina C.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2009, 55 (11) : 5179 - 5196
  • [7] Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives
    Bengio, Yoshua
    Courville, Aaron
    Vincent, Pascal
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2013, 35 (08) : 1798 - 1828
  • [8] Bishop C. M., 2006, PATTERN RECOGNITION, DOI DOI 10.1117/1.2819119
  • [9] Waveform design for multiple extended targets in temporally correlated cognitive radar system
    Chen, Peng
    Wu, Lenan
    [J]. IET RADAR SONAR AND NAVIGATION, 2016, 10 (02) : 398 - 410
  • [10] SUMMeR: Sub-Nyquist MIMO Radar
    Cohen, David
    Cohen, Deborah
    Eldar, Yonina C.
    Haimovich, Alexander M.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2018, 66 (16) : 4315 - 4330