IHC Color Histograms for Unsupervised Ki67 Proliferation Index Calculation

被引:20
作者
Geread, Rokshana S. [1 ]
Morreale, Peter [2 ]
Dony, Robert D. [2 ]
Brouwer, Emily [3 ]
Wood, Geoffrey A. [3 ]
Androutsos, Dimitrios [1 ]
Khademi, April [1 ]
机构
[1] Ryerson Univ, Image Anaysis Med Lab, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Guelph, Sch Engn, Guelph, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Guelph, Ontario Veterinarian Coll, Guelph, ON, Canada
关键词
breast cancer; color deconvolution; color image processing; hematoxylin; Ki67; color separation; histogram; proliferation index; BREAST-CANCER; AMERICAN SOCIETY; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MARKER; RECOMMENDATIONS; QUANTIFICATION; VALIDATION; PROGNOSIS; SELECTION; DESIGNS;
D O I
10.3389/fbioe.2019.00226
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Automated image analysis tools for Ki67 breast cancer digital pathology images would have significant value if integrated into diagnostic pathology workflows. Such tools would reduce the workload of pathologists, while improving efficiency, and accuracy. Developing tools that are robust and reliable to multicentre data is challenging, however, differences in staining protocols, digitization equipment, staining compounds, and slide preparation can create variabilities in image quality and color across digital pathology datasets. In this work, a novel unsupervised color separation framework based on the IHC color histogram (IHCCH) is proposed for the robust analysis of Ki67 and hematoxylin stained images in multicentre datasets. An "overstaining" threshold is implemented to adjust for background overstaining, and an automated nuclei radius estimator is designed to improve nuclei detection. Proliferation index and F1 scores were compared between the proposed method and manually labeled ground truth data for 30 TMA cores that have ground truths for Ki67+ and Ki67- nuclei. The method accurately quantified the PI over the dataset, with an average proliferation index difference of 3.25%. To ensure the method generalizes to new, diverse datasets, 50 Ki67 TMAs from the Protein Atlas were used to test the validated approach. As the ground truth for this dataset is PI ranges, the automated result was compared to the PI range. The proposed method correctly classified 74 out of 80 TMA images, resulting in a 92.5% accuracy. In addition to these validations experiments, performance was compared to two color-deconvolution based methods, and to six machine learning classifiers. In all cases, the proposed work maintained more consistent (reproducible) results, and higher PI quantification accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Image Analysis in Digital Pathology: Combining Automated Assessment of Ki67 Staining Quality with Calculation of Ki67 Cell Proliferation Index
    Bengtsson, Ewert
    Ranefall, Petter
    CYTOMETRY PART A, 2019, 95A (07) : 714 - 716
  • [2] Ki67 immunohistochemistry: a valuable marker in prognostication but with a risk of misclassification: proliferation subgroups formed based on Ki67 immunoreactivity and standardized mitotic index
    Jalava, P
    Kuopio, T
    Juntti-Patinen, L
    Kotkansalo, T
    Kronqvist, P
    Collan, Y
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2006, 48 (06) : 674 - 682
  • [3] piNET-An Automated Proliferation Index Calculator Framework for Ki67 Breast Cancer Images
    Geread, Rokshana Stephny
    Sivanandarajah, Abishika
    Brouwer, Emily Rita
    Wood, Geoffrey A.
    Androutsos, Dimitrios
    Faragalla, Hala
    Khademi, April
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (01) : 1 - 30
  • [4] Ki67 Proliferation Index Quantification Using Silver Standard Masks
    Mirjahanmardi, Seyed Hossein
    Dawe, Melanie
    Fyles, Anthony
    Shi, Wei
    Androutsos, Dimitri
    Liu, Fei-Fei
    Done, Susan
    Khademi, April
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2023, 2023, 12471
  • [5] Relationship between ER expression by IHC or mRNA with Ki67 response to aromatase inhibition: a POETIC study
    Lopez-Knowles, Elena
    Detre, Simone
    Hills, Margaret
    Schuster, Eugene F.
    Cheang, Maggie C. U.
    Tovey, Holly
    Kilburn, Lucy S.
    Bliss, Judith M.
    Robertson, John
    Mallon, Elizabeth
    Skene, Anthony
    Evans, Abigail
    Smith, Ian
    Dowsett, Mitch
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (01)
  • [6] Prognostic value of Ki67 index in gastrointestinal stromal tumors
    Zhao, Wen-Yi
    Xu, Jia
    Wang, Ming
    Zhang, Zi-Zhen
    Tu, Lin
    Wang, Chao-Jie
    Lin, Tian-Long
    Shen, Yan-Yin
    Liu, Qiang
    Cao, Hui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2014, 7 (05): : 2298 - 2304
  • [7] New Robust and Reproducible Stereological IHC Ki67 Breast Cancer Proliferative Assessment to Replace Traditional Biased Labeling Index
    Bigras, Gilbert
    Dong, Wei-Feng
    Canil, Sarah
    Hugh, Judith
    Berendt, Richard
    Wood, George
    Yang, Hua
    APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2017, 25 (10) : 687 - 695
  • [8] Proliferation Marker Ki67 as a Stratification Index of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable Mucosal Melanoma
    Tang, Lirui
    Wei, Xiaoting
    Li, Caili
    Dai, Jie
    Bai, Xue
    Mao, Lili
    Chi, Zhihong
    Cui, Chuanliang
    Lian, Bin
    Tang, Bixia
    Du, Yu
    Wang, Xuan
    Lai, Yumei
    Sheng, Xinan
    Yan, Xieqiao
    Li, Siming
    Zhou, Li
    Kong, Yan
    Li, Zhongwu
    Si, Lu
    Guo, Jun
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [9] Comparison of the effect of different techniques for measurement of Ki67 proliferation on reproducibility and prognosis prediction accuracy in breast cancer
    Gudlaugsson, Einar
    Skaland, Ivar
    Janssen, Emiel A. M.
    Smaaland, Rune
    Shao, Zhiming
    Malpica, Anais
    Voorhorst, Feja
    Baak, Jan P. A.
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2012, 61 (06) : 1134 - 1144
  • [10] Assessment of the Ki67 labeling index: a Japanese validation ring study
    Niikura, Naoki
    Sakatani, Takashi
    Arima, Nobuyuki
    Ohi, Yasuyo
    Honma, Naoko
    Kanomata, Naoki
    Yoshida, Kazuya
    Kadoya, Takayuki
    Tamaki, Kentaro
    Kumaki, Nobue
    Iwamoto, Takayuki
    Sugie, Tomoharu
    Moriya, Takuya
    BREAST CANCER, 2016, 23 (01) : 92 - 100