Rethinking Patrimonialism and Neopatrimonialism in Africa

被引:111
作者
Pitcher, Anne [1 ]
Moran, Mary H. [1 ]
Johnston, Michael
机构
[1] Colgate Univ, Dept Sociol & Anthropol, Hamilton, NY 13346 USA
关键词
ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT; CIVIL-SOCIETY; BOTSWANA; INSTITUTIONS; STATE; ELECTIONS; SAN;
D O I
10.1353/arw.0.0163
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
Current usages of the terms patrimonial and neopatrimonial in the context of Africa are conceptually problematical and amount to a serious misreading of Weber. His use of the term patrimonial delineated a legitimate type of authority, not a type of regime, and included notions of reciprocity and voluntary compliance between rulers and the ruled. Those reciprocities enabled subjects to check the actions of rulers, which most. analyses of (neo)patrimonialism overlook. We apply these insights to a case study of Botswana and suggest that scholars reconsider the application of Weber's concepts to African states.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 156
页数:32
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
Acemoglu D, 2003, IN SEARCH OF PROPSPERITY, P80
[2]  
[Anonymous], EC SNAPSHOT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1978, EC SOC OUTLINE INTER
[4]  
[Anonymous], BREAKING BARRIERS CR
[5]  
[Anonymous], ECONOMIST 1106
[6]  
[Anonymous], COMMUNITY STATE LUSO
[7]  
[Anonymous], STATE AFRICAN POLITI
[8]  
[Anonymous], J COMMONWEALTH COMP
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1994, EC CHANGE POLITICAL
[10]  
[Anonymous], NEW AFRICAN