Harmonization in laboratory medicine: Requests, samples, measurements and reports

被引:50
作者
Plebani, Mario [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Padua, Italy
关键词
total testing process; patient safety; global picture; post-analytical phase; pre-analytical phase; quality; standardization; Harmonization; GERIATRIC AGES ESTABLISHMENT; ADULT REFERENCE INTERVALS; EFLM WORKING GROUP; CLINICAL-CHEMISTRY; CRITICAL-VALUES; EUROPEAN FEDERATION; QUALITY INDICATORS; PERFORMANCE CRITERIA; METROLOGICAL TRACEABILITY; INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION;
D O I
10.3109/10408363.2015.1116851
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
In laboratory medicine, the terms "standardization" and "harmonization" are frequently used interchangeably as the final goal is the same: the equivalence of measurement results among different routine measurement procedures over time and space according to defined analytical and clinical quality specifications. However, the terms define two distinct, albeit closely linked, concepts based on traceability principles. The word "standardization" is used when results for a measurement are equivalent and traceable to the International System of Units (SI) through a high-order primary reference material and/or a reference measurement procedure (RMP). "Harmonization" is generally used when results are equivalent, but neither a high-order primary reference material nor a reference measurement procedure is available. Harmonization is a fundamental aspect of quality in laboratory medicine as its ultimate goal is to improve patient outcomes through the provision of accurate and actionable laboratory information. Patients, clinicians and other healthcare professionals assume that clinical laboratory tests performed by different laboratories at different times on the same sample and specimen can be compared, and that results can be reliably and consistently interpreted. Unfortunately, this is not necessarily the case, because many laboratory test results are still highly variable and poorly standardized and harmonized. Although the initial focus was mainly on harmonizing and standardizing analytical processes and methods, the scope of harmonization now also includes all other aspects of the total testing process (TTP), such as terminology and units, report formats, reference intervals and decision limits as well as tests and test profiles, requests and criteria for interpretation. Several projects and initiatives aiming to improve standardization and harmonization in the testing process are now underway. Laboratory professionals should therefore step up their efforts to provide interchangeable and comparable laboratory information in order to ultimately assure better diagnosis and treatment in patient care.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 196
页数:13
相关论文
共 144 条
  • [71] Patient Safety and Clinical Effectiveness as Imperatives for Achieving Harmonization inside and outside the Clinical Laboratory
    McLawhon, Ronald W.
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2011, 57 (07) : 936 - 938
  • [72] Harmonization of Test Results: What Are the Challenges; How Can We Make It Better?
    Miller, W. Greg
    Eckfeldt, John H.
    Passarelli, Joseph
    Rosner, William
    Young, Ian S.
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2014, 60 (07) : 923 - 927
  • [73] Harmonization: the Sample, the Measurement, and the Report
    Miller, W. Greg
    Tate, Jillian R.
    Barth, Julian H.
    Jones, Graham R. D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2014, 34 (03) : 187 - 197
  • [74] Proficiency Testing/External Quality Assessment: Current Challenges and Future Directions
    Miller, W. Greg
    Jones, Graham R. D.
    Horowitz, Gary L.
    Weykamp, Cas
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2011, 57 (12) : 1670 - 1680
  • [75] Roadmap for Harmonization of Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures
    Miller, W. Greg
    Myers, Gary L.
    Gantzer, Mary Lou
    Kahn, Stephen E.
    Schonbrunner, E. Ralf
    Thienpont, Linda M.
    Bunk, David M.
    Christenson, Robert H.
    Eckfeldt, John H.
    Lo, Stanley F.
    Nuebling, C. Micha
    Sturgeon, Catharine M.
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2011, 57 (08) : 1108 - 1117
  • [76] Why commutability matters
    Miller, WG
    Myers, GL
    Rej, R
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2006, 52 (04) : 553 - 554
  • [77] Traceability and standardization of immunoassays: A major challenge
    Morris, H. A.
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2009, 42 (4-5) : 241 - 245
  • [78] Nikolac N, 2013, BIOCHEM MEDICA, V23, P242
  • [79] Novis DA, 2000, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V124, P499
  • [80] Critical Values in the Coagulation Laboratory Results of a Survey of the North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association
    Pai, Menaka
    Moffat, Karen A.
    Plumhoff, Elizabeth
    Hayward, Catherine P. M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2011, 136 (06) : 836 - 841