Static magnetic field effects on human subjects related to magnetic resonance imaging systems

被引:107
作者
Chakeres, DW
de Vocht, F
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Ohio State Univ Hosp, Coll Med & Publ Hlth, Dept Radiol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Univ Utrecht, Inst Risk Assessment Sci, Environm & Occupat Hlth Div, NL-3508 TD Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; high static magnetic fields; MRI safety; neuro-cognitive function;
D O I
10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2004.08.012
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Goal: This paper reviews recent studies evaluating human subjects for physiologic or neuro-cognitive function adverse effects resulting from exposure to static magnetic fields of magnetic resonance! imaging systems. Materials and Methods: The results of three studies are summarized. Two studies evaluated exposure to a maximum of 8 Tesla (T). The first series studied 25 normal human subjects' sequential vital sips (heart rate, blood pressure, blood oxygenation, core temperature, ECG, respiratory rate) measured at different magnetic field strengths to a maximum of 8 T. A second series of 25 subjects were studied at 0.05 and 8 T (out and in the bore of the magnet), performing 12 different standardized neuro-psychological tests and auditory-motor reaction times. The subjects' comments were recorded immediately following the study and after a three-month interval. The third study contained 17 subjects, placed near the bore of a 1.5T magnet and it used six different cognitive, cognitive-motor. or sensory tests. Results: There were no clinically significant changes in the subjects' physiologic measurements at 8 T. There was a slight increase in the systolic blood pressure with increasing magnetic field strength. There did not appear to be any adverse effect on the cognitive performance of the subjects at 8 T. A few subjects commented at the time of initial exposure on dizziness, metallic taste in the mouth. or discomfort related to the measurement instruments or the head coil. There were no adverse comments at 3 months. The 1.5T study had two of the four neuro-behavioral domains exhibiting adverse effects (sensory and cognitive-motor). Conclusions: These studies did not demonstrate any clinically relevant adverse effects on neuro-cognitive testing or vital sign changes. One short-term memory, one sensory, and one cognitive-motor test demonstrated adverse effects, but the significance is not clear. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 265
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]  
High WB, 2000, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V12, P122, DOI 10.1002/1522-2586(200007)12:1<122::AID-JMRI14>3.0.CO
[12]  
2-C
[13]   Advances in high-field magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Hu, XP ;
Norris, DG .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 6 :157-184
[14]   SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS IN MR IMAGING [J].
KANAL, E ;
SHELLOCK, FG ;
TALAGALA, L .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 176 (03) :593-606
[15]   Cognitive, cardiac, and physiological safety studies in ultra high field magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Kangarlu, A ;
Burgess, RE ;
Zhu, H ;
Nakayama, T ;
Hamlin, RL ;
Abduljalil, AM ;
Robitaille, PML .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1999, 17 (10) :1407-1416
[16]  
Kangarlu A, 2000, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V12, P107, DOI 10.1002/1522-2586(200007)12:1<107::AID-JMRI12>3.3.CO
[17]  
2-X
[18]  
Kinouchi Y, 1996, BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, V17, P21, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1996)17:1<21::AID-BEM3>3.0.CO
[19]  
2-8
[20]   Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-Tesla [J].
Martin, ET ;
Coman, JA ;
Shellock, FG ;
Pulling, CC ;
Fair, R ;
Jenkins, K .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (07) :1315-1324