Multicenter Noninferiority Evaluation of Hain GenoType MTBDRplus Version 2 and Nipro NTM plus MDRTB Line Probe Assays for Detection of Rifampin and Isoniazid Resistance

被引:54
作者
Nathavitharana, Ruvandhi R. [1 ]
Hillemann, Doris [2 ]
Schumacher, Samuel G. [3 ]
Schlueter, Birte [2 ]
Ismail, Nazir [4 ]
Omar, Shaheed Vally [4 ]
Sikhondze, Welile [5 ]
Havumaki, Joshua [3 ]
Valli, Eloise [3 ]
Boehme, Catharina [3 ]
Denkinger, Claudia M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Infect Dis, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Forschungszentrum Borstel, Natl Reference Lab Mycobacteria, Borstel, Germany
[3] FIND, Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Natl Inst Communicable Dis, Ctr TB, Johannesburg, South Africa
[5] Minist Hlth, Natl TB Control Program, Geneva, Swaziland
关键词
MYCOBACTERIUM-TUBERCULOSIS; MUTATIONS; DIAGNOSIS; TESTS;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.00251-16
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Less than 30% of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) patients are currently diagnosed, due to laboratory constraints. Molecular diagnostics enable rapid and simplified diagnosis. Newer-version line probe assays have not been evaluated against the WHO-endorsed Hain GenoType MTBDRplus (referred to as Hain version 1 [V1]) for the rapid detection of rifampin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH) resistance. A two-phase noninferiority study was conducted in two supranational reference laboratories to allow head-to-head comparisons of two new tests, Hain Genotype MTBDRplus version 2 (referred to as Hain version 2 [V2]) and Nipro NTM+MDRTB detection kit 2 (referred to as Nipro), to Hain V1. In phase 1, the results for 379 test strains were compared to a composite reference standard that used phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) and targeted sequencing. In phase 2, the results for 644 sputum samples were compared to a phenotypic DST reference standard alone. Using a challenging set of strains in phase 1, the values for sensitivity and specificity for Hain V1, Hain V2, and Nipro, respectively, were 90.3%/98.5%, 90.3%/98.5%, and 92.0%/98.5% for RIF resistance detection and 89.1%/99.4%, 89.1%/99.4%, and 89.6%/100.0% for INH resistance detection. Testing of sputa in phase 2 yielded values for sensitivity and specificity of 97.1%/97.1%, 98.2%/97.8%, and 96.5%/97.5% for RIF and 94.4%/96.4%, 95.4%/98.8%, and 94.9%/97.6% for INH. Overall, the rates of indeterminate results were low, but there was a higher rate of indeterminate results with Nipro than with Hain V1 and V2 in samples with low smear grades. Noninferiority of Hain V2 and Nipro to Hain V1 was demonstrated for RIF and INH resistance detection in isolates and sputum specimens. These results serve as evidence for WHO policy recommendations on the use of line probe assays, including the Hain V2 and Nipro assays, for MDR-TB detection.
引用
收藏
页码:1624 / 1630
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] lsoniazid and rifampicin resistance mutations and their effect on second-line anti-tuberculosis treatment
    Abate, D.
    Tedla, Y.
    Meressa, D.
    Ameni, G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE, 2014, 18 (08) : 946 - 951
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2008, WHO POL STAT MOL LIN
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, Guidance for industry. Non-inferiority clinical trials
  • [4] The Diagnostic Performance of the GenoType MTBDRplus Version 2 Line Probe Assay Is Equivalent to That of the Xpert MTB/RIF Assay
    Barnard, M.
    Gey van Pittius, N. C.
    van Helden, P. D.
    Bosman, M.
    Coetzee, G.
    Warren, R. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 50 (11) : 3712 - 3716
  • [5] First Evaluation of an Improved Assay for Molecular Genetic Detection of Tuberculosis as Well as Rifampin and Isoniazid Resistances
    Crudu, Valeriu
    Stratan, Ecaterina
    Romancenco, Elena
    Allerheiligen, Vera
    Hillemann, Andreas
    Moraru, Nicolae
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 50 (04) : 1264 - 1269
  • [6] The Impact of Isoniazid Resistance on the Treatment Outcomes of Smear Positive Re-Treatment Tuberculosis Patients in the State of Andhra Pradesh, India
    Deepa, Dorai
    Achanta, Shanta
    Jaju, Jyoti
    Rao, Koteswara
    Samyukta, Rani
    Claassens, Mareli
    Kumar, Ajay M. V.
    Vishnu, P. H.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (10):
  • [7] A systematic review of rapid diagnostic tests for the detection of tuberculosis infection
    Dinnes, J.
    Deeks, J.
    Kunst, H.
    Gibson, A.
    Cummins, E.
    Waugh, N.
    Drobniewski, F.
    Lalvani, A.
    [J]. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2007, 11 (03) : 1 - +
  • [8] Heifets LB, 1999, INT J TUBERC LUNG D, V3, P564
  • [9] Evaluation of the GenoType MTBDRplus assay for rifampin and isoniazid susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains and clinical specimens
    Hillemann, Doris
    Ruesch-Gerdes, Sabine
    Richter, Elvira
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 45 (08) : 2635 - 2640
  • [10] GenoType MTBDR assays for the diagnosis of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a meta-analysis
    Ling, D. I.
    Zwerling, A. A.
    Pai, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2008, 32 (05) : 1165 - 1174