The influence of Science and Technology Park characteristics on firms' innovation results

被引:60
作者
Albahari, Alberto [1 ]
Barge-Gil, Andres [2 ]
Perez-Canto, Salvador [1 ]
Modrego, Aurelia [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaga, Sch Ind Engn, Dept Econ & Business Adm, Malaga, Spain
[2] Univ Complutense Madrid, Dept Fdn Econ Anal Quantitat Econ 2, Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Carlos III Madrid, Lab Anal & Assessment Tech Change, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Science and technology parks; agglomerations; innovation policy; innovation determinants; ACADEMIC-INDUSTRY LINKS; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; PERFORMANCE; CLUSTERS; IMPACT; KNOWLEDGE; AGGLOMERATION; INCUBATORS; GROWTH; DIFFERENTIATION;
D O I
10.1111/pirs.12253
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The effectiveness of Science and Technology Parks (STPs) as instruments of innovation policy has generated thriving debate among academics, practitioners and policy makers. A gap in the existing literature on STPs is that research mostly does not consider STPs' heterogeneity. The present paper aims at filling this gap, analysing the influence of different STP characteristics on their tenants' performance. Using data on 849 firms and 25 STPs from the 2009 Community Innovation Survey for Spain and a survey of STP managers respectively and after controlling for a wide set of firms characteristics, we find that: (i) firms located in very new or longer established STPs show better innovative performance; (ii) the size of the STP and its management company positively affects the innovative performance of tenants while services provision has no effect on firms' achieving better results; and (iii) firms in less technologically developed regions benefit more from location in an STP. Theoretical, policy and managerial contributions of our research are discussed in the paper.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / +
页数:28
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   Evaluation of national science park systems: a theoretical framework and its application to the Italian and Spanish systems [J].
Albahari, Alberto ;
Catalano, Giuseppe ;
Landoni, Paolo .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2013, 25 (05) :599-614
[2]   LOCATION STRATEGIES FOR AGGLOMERATION ECONOMIES [J].
Alcacer, Juan ;
Chung, Wilbur .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (12) :1749-1761
[3]   Spatial dependence and the representation of space in empirical models [J].
Andersson, Martin ;
Grasjo, Urban .
ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2009, 43 (01) :159-180
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Ind. Corp. Chang.
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, International Journal of the Economics of Business, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13571510110079612, 10.1080/13571510110079612]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2 EUR C ENTR INN UTR
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1998, R D PRODUCTIVITY ECO
[8]  
APTE, 2015, MEM APTE 2014
[9]   INTERFIRM KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGES AND THE KNOWLEDGE CREATION CAPABILITY OF CLUSTERS [J].
Arikan, Andac T. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2009, 34 (04) :658-676
[10]   SILICON VALLEY LOCATIONAL CLUSTERS - WHEN DO INCREASING RETURNS IMPLY MONOPOLY [J].
ARTHUR, WB .
MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 1990, 19 (03) :235-251