Ovarian stimulation modalities in poor responders

被引:20
作者
Ozkan, Zehra Sema [1 ]
机构
[1] Kirikkale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Kirikkale, Turkey
关键词
Poor ovarian response; cycle cancellation; DHEA; double stimulation; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; GNRH-ANTAGONISTS; EMBRYO-TRANSFER; IVF; PREGNANCY; BLIND; HYPERSTIMULATION; SUPPLEMENTATION; LETROZOLE; PROTOCOLS;
D O I
10.3906/sag-1905-179
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In a group of IVF/ICSI cycles, despite the appropriate ovarian stimulation, the number of oocytes collected is below the expected value. This condition is defined as poor ovarian response (POR) to stimulation. POR brings the risk of cycle cancellation with an estimated rate of 20%. Infertility experts are trying to improve cycle outcomes of POR cases with multiple modifications. This review article will present the latest modifications on the management of POR. The studies performed for improving cycle outcome in POR cases were evaluated and their notable results were presented. The first intervention among infertility specialists is to make a standard definition for POR. The BOLOGNA criteria and the subsequent POSEIDON group definitions are the latest updates in POR management. GnRH antagonists, estradiol priming, double stimulation, letrozole administration, DHEA, and herbal therapy supplementations are the recent modifications done to improve oocyte retrieval and subsequent embryo transfer for POR cases. This review article presents the encouraging methods applied for POR cases to improve cycle outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:959 / 962
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does daily co administration of gonadotropins and letrozole during the ovarian stimulation improve IVF outcome for poor and sub optimal responders?
    Shapira, Moran
    Orvieto, Raoul
    Lebovitz, Oshrit
    Nahum, Ravit
    Aizer, Adva
    Segev-Zahav, Aliza
    Haas, Jigal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH, 2020, 13 (01)
  • [42] The effect of androgen administration on in vitro fertilization outcome in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation with microdose protocol: A randomized clinical trial
    Aflatoonain, Abbas
    Saeed, Lida
    Hosseinisadat, Robabe
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 279 : 72 - 76
  • [43] Poor Ovarian Response to Stimulation for In Vitro Fertilization
    Spremovic-Radjenovic, Svetlana
    Bila, Jovan
    Gudovic, Aleksandra
    Vidakovic, Snezana
    Dokic, Milan
    Radunovic, Nebojsa
    [J]. SRPSKI ARHIV ZA CELOKUPNO LEKARSTVO, 2015, 143 (5-6) : 354 - 361
  • [44] Cumulative live birth rate after three ovarian stimulation IVF cycles for poor ovarian responders according to the bologna criteria
    Ke, Hui
    Chen, Xin
    Liu, Yu-dong
    Ye, De-sheng
    He, Yu-xia
    Chen, Shi-ling
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 33 (03) : 418 - 422
  • [45] Combined evaluation of risk factors predicting poor ovarian responders in Chinese patients undergoing in vitro fertilization
    Huang, Lu
    Wang, Shuyu
    Ma, Yanmin
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2016, 32 (02) : 124 - 127
  • [46] Poor ovarian responders: to meta-analyse or not, that is the question
    Polyzos, N. P.
    Tournaye, H.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2014, 29 (03) : 634 - 635
  • [47] Ovarian stimulation protocols for poor ovarian responders: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Man Di
    Xiaohong Wang
    Jing Wu
    Hongya Yang
    [J]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2023, 307 : 1713 - 1726
  • [48] Pituitary suppression protocol among Bologna poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation using corifollitropin alfa: does it play any role?
    Errazuriz, Joaquin
    Drakopoulos, Panagiotis
    Pening, David
    Racca, Annalisa
    Romito, Alessia
    De Munck, Nelke
    Tournaye, Herman
    De Vos, Michel
    Blockeel, Christophe
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2019, 38 (06) : 1010 - 1017
  • [49] The predictor markers of ovarian response in poor responders under 40 years of age
    Vural, B.
    Cakiroglu, Y.
    Vural, F.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 43 (05) : 650 - 653
  • [50] Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Minimal Ovarian Stimulation in-vitro Fertilization versus Conventional Ovarian Stimulation in Poor Responders: Economic Evaluation Alongside a Propensity Score Adjusted Prospective Observational Study
    de Souza, Tatiane Oliveira
    Ben, Angela Jornada
    van Dongen, Johanna M.
    Bosmans, Judith E.
    Lahorgue da Cunha-Filho, Joao Sabino
    [J]. JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE REPRODUCAO ASSISTIDA, 2023, 27 (02): : 204 - 214