Introducing two Random Forest based methods for cloud detection in remote sensing images

被引:76
作者
Ghasemian, Nafiseh [1 ]
Akhoondzadeh, Mehdi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Coll Engn, Sch Surveying & Geospatial Engn, Remote Sensing Dept, North Amirabad Ave, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Cloud detection; Feature Level Fusion Random Forest; Decision Level Fusion Random Forest; Remote sensing imagery; LAND-COVER CLASSIFICATION; ALGORITHM; SHADOW; DECISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.asr.2018.04.030
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Cloud detection is a necessary phase in satellite images processing to retrieve the atmospheric and lithospheric parameters. Currently, some cloud detection methods based on Random Forest (RF) model have been proposed but they do not consider both spectral and textural characteristics of the image. Furthermore, they have not been tested in the presence of snow/ice. In this paper, we introduce two RF based algorithms, Feature Level Fusion Random Forest (FLFRF) and Decision Level Fusion Random Forest (DLFRF) to incorporate visible, infrared (IR) and thermal spectral and textural features (FLFRF) including Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) and Robust Extended Local Binary Pattern (RELBP_CI) or visible, IR and thermal classifiers (DLFRF) for highly accurate cloud detection on remote sensing images. FLFRF first fuses visible, IR and thermal features. Thereafter, it uses the RF model to classify pixels to cloud, snow/ice and background or thick cloud, thin cloud and background. DLFRF considers visible, IR and thermal features (both spectral and textural) separately and inserts each set of features to RF model. Then, it holds vote matrix of each run of the model. Finally, it fuses the classifiers using the majority vote method. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms, 10 Terra MODIS and 15 Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS images with different spatial resolutions are used in this paper. Quantitative analyses are based on manually selected ground truth data. Results show that after adding RELBP_CI to input feature set cloud detection accuracy improves. Also, the average cloud kappa values of FLFRF and DLFRF on MODIS images (1 and 0.99) are higher than other machine learning methods, Linear Discriminate Analysis (LDA), Classification And Regression Tree (CART), K Nearest Neighbor (KNN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) (0.96). The average snow/ice kappa values of FLFRF and DLFRF on MODIS images (1 and 0.85) are higher than other traditional methods. The quantitative values on Landsat 8 images show similar trend. Consequently, while SVM and K-nearest neighbor show overestimation in predicting cloud and snow/ice pixels, our Random Forest (RF) based models can achieve higher cloud, snow/ice kappa values on MODIS and thin cloud, thick cloud and snow/ice kappa values on Landsat 8 images. Our algorithms predict both thin and thick cloud on Landsat 8 images while the existing cloud detection algorithm, Fmask cannot discriminate them. Compared to the state-of-the-art methods, our algorithms have acquired higher average cloud and snow/ice kappa values for different spatial resolutions. (C) 2018 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 303
页数:16
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   A new approach for estimating mangrove canopy cover using Landsat 8 imagery [J].
Abd-El Monsef, Hesham ;
Smith, Scot E. .
COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2017, 135 :183-194
[2]  
Ackerman S., 2010, MOD35 U WISC COOP I
[3]   Detecting gas flares and estimating flaring volumes at individual flow stations using MODIS data [J].
Anejionu, Obinna C. D. ;
Blackburn, G. Alan ;
Whyatt, J. Duncan .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 158 :81-94
[4]   Cloud Detection for High-Resolution Satellite Imagery Using Machine Learning and Multi-Feature Fusion [J].
Bai, Ting ;
Li, Deren ;
Sun, Kaimin ;
Chen, Yepei ;
Li, Wenzhuo .
REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 8 (09)
[5]   Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions [J].
Belgiu, Mariana ;
Dragut, Lucian .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 114 :24-31
[6]  
Bréon FM, 1999, J APPL METEOROL, V38, P777, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<0777:CDFTSP>2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]   Cloud detection in all-sky images via multi-scale neighborhood features and multiple supervised learning techniques [J].
Cheng, Hsu-Yung ;
Lin, Chih-Lung .
ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2017, 10 (01) :199-208
[9]   Cloud detection in Landsat imagery of ice sheets using shadow matching technique and automatic normalized difference snow index threshold value decision [J].
Choi, H ;
Bindschadler, R .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 91 (02) :237-242
[10]   National Park vegetation mapping using multitemporal Landsat 7 data and a decision tree classifier [J].
de Colstoun, ECB ;
Story, MH ;
Thompson, C ;
Commisso, K ;
Smith, TG ;
Irons, JR .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 85 (03) :316-327