Generating process of emerging topics in the life sciences

被引:15
作者
Ohniwa, Ryosuke L. [1 ,2 ]
Hibino, Aiko [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tsukuba, Fac Med, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058575, Japan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Ctr Biotechnol, Taipei 106, Taiwan
[3] Hirosaki Univ, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Hirosaki, Aomori 0368560, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Trends in life science; Emerging topics; MeSH terms; PubMed; Metrical index; MEDICAL SUBJECT-HEADINGS; NETWORK ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGIES; IDENTIFICATION; VISUALIZATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-019-03248-z
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Clarifying the mechanism of how emerging topics in science and technology research fields are generated is useful for both researchers and agencies to identify potential emerging topics of the future. In the present study, we use bibliometric analyses targeting data of about 30 million published articles from 1970 to 2017 on PubMed, the largest article database in the life science field, to test our hypothesis that existing emerging topics contribute to the generation of new emerging topics in that field. We first collected emerging keywords from medical subject headings attached to each article using our previously reported methodology (Ohniwa et al. in Scientometrics 85(1):111-127, 2010, 10.1007/s11192-010-0252-2), and performed co-word analyses of each emerging keyword 1-year prior to it becoming an emerging keyword. About 75% of total emerging keywords, at 1-year prior to becoming identified as emerging, co-appeared with other emerging keywords in the same article. Furthermore, most of the keywords co-appeared again at the point when the target keyword was identified as emerging, which is consistent with our hypothesis regarding the mechanism that emerging topics generate emerging topics.
引用
收藏
页码:1549 / 1561
页数:13
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Batagelj V, 2002, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V2265, P477
  • [2] The sociology of expectations in science and technology
    Borup, Mads
    Brown, Nik
    Konrad, Kornelia
    Van Lente, Harro
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2006, 18 (3-4) : 285 - 298
  • [3] Emerging technologies: quantitative identification and measurement
    Cozzens, Susan
    Gatchair, Sonia
    Kang, Jongseok
    Kim, Kyung-Sup
    Lee, Hyuck Jai
    Ordonez, Gonzalo
    Porter, Alan
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2010, 22 (03) : 361 - 376
  • [4] Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis
    Daim, Tugrul U.
    Rueda, Guillenno
    Martin, Hilary
    Gerdsri, Pisek
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2006, 73 (08) : 981 - 1012
  • [5] Identifying the evolutionary process of emerging technologies: A chronological network analysis of World Wide Web conference sessions
    Furukawa, Takao
    Mori, Kaoru
    Arino, Kazuma
    Hayashi, Kazuhiro
    Shirakawa, Nobuyuki
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2015, 91 : 280 - 294
  • [6] Using 'core documents' for detecting and labelling new emerging topics
    Glanzel, Wolfgang
    Thijs, Bart
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2012, 91 (02) : 399 - 416
  • [7] Mixed-indicators model for identifying emerging research areas
    Guo, Hanning
    Weingart, Scott
    Boerner, Katy
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2011, 89 (01) : 421 - 435
  • [8] Hawkes process-based technology impact analysis
    Jang, Hyun Jin
    Woo, Han-Gyun
    Lee, Changyong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2017, 11 (02) : 511 - 529
  • [9] Early identification of emerging technologies: A machine learning approach using multiple patent indicators
    Lee, Changyong
    Kwon, Ohjin
    Kim, Myeongjung
    Kwon, Daeil
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2018, 127 : 291 - 303
  • [10] Stochastic technology life cycle analysis using multiple patent indicators
    Lee, Changyong
    Kim, Juram
    Kwon, Ohjin
    Woo, Han-Gyun
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2016, 106 : 53 - 64