Discrete Choice Experiments to Elicit Patient Preferences for Decision Making in Transplantation

被引:8
作者
James, Laura J. [1 ,2 ]
Wong, Germaine [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tong, Allison [1 ,2 ]
Craig, Jonathan C. [4 ]
Howard, Kirsten [1 ]
Howell, Martin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Childrens Hosp Westmead, Ctr Kidney Res, Locked Bag 4001, Westmead, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Westmead Hosp, Ctr Transplant & Renal Res, Westmead, NSW, Australia
[4] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Med & Publ Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; HEALTH-CARE; ALLOCATION; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.1097/TP.0000000000003500
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Providing care for transplant recipients is challenging given the need to maintain optimal graft function and survival while managing the debilitating side effects and complications associated with immunosuppression including infection, cancer, new-onset diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease. Given the complexity of treatment options and the uncertainty about long-term benefits and harms of treatment, understanding patient preferences and values are key to ensuring that clinical decisions take into consideration patient priorities to support shared decision making and self-management. Choice experiments are increasingly used to quantify patient and community preferences, including in the field of transplantation. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are a well-established, validated methodology used to elicit preferences for decision making in health and other settings. In transplantation, for example, DCEs have been used to elicit patient preferences for outcomes following kidney transplantation, to identify community preferences factors for organ allocation and in establishing core outcomes. This article provides an overview of the concepts and methods used in the design of DCEs and how patients' preferences can be applied in shared decision making in transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:960 / 967
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Applied choice analysis
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, COGNITIVE INTERVIEWI
[3]  
Bennett J, 2001, CHOICE MODELLING APP
[4]   Preferences for cancer treatments: an overview of methods and applications in oncology [J].
Blinman, P. ;
King, M. ;
Norman, R. ;
Viney, R. ;
Stockler, M. R. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 (05) :1104-1110
[5]  
Bottom J, 1999, TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC THEORY, P577
[6]   Improving health care by understanding patient preferences: The role of computer technology [J].
Brennan, PF ;
Strombom, I .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 1998, 5 (03) :257-262
[7]   Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health-a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force [J].
Bridges, John F. P. ;
Hauber, A. Brett ;
Marshall, Deborah ;
Lloyd, Andrew ;
Prosser, Lisa A. ;
Regier, Dean A. ;
Johnson, F. Reed ;
Mauskopf, Josephine .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) :403-413
[8]  
Bryan S., 2004, DISCRETE CHOICE EXPT
[9]   Decision-making about suitability for kidney transplantation: Results of a national survey of Australian nephrologists [J].
Cass, Alan ;
Cunningham, Joan ;
Anderson, Kate ;
Snelling, Paul ;
Colman, Sam ;
Devitt, Jeannie ;
Preece, Cilla ;
Eris, Josette .
NEPHROLOGY, 2007, 12 (03) :299-304
[10]   Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature [J].
Clark, Michael D. ;
Determann, Domino ;
Petrou, Stavros ;
Moro, Domenico ;
de Bekker-Grob, Esther W. .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2014, 32 (09) :883-902