Craniosacral therapy for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:31
|
作者
Haller, Heidemarie [1 ]
Lauche, Romy [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Sundberg, Tobias [4 ,5 ]
Dobos, Gustav [1 ]
Cramer, Holger [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Duisburg Essen, Dept Internal & Integrat Med, Evang Kliniken Essen Mitte, Fac Med, Essen, Germany
[2] Sozialstiftung Bamberg, Dept Internal & Integrat Med, Bamberg, Germany
[3] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Hlth, ARCCIM, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Nursing & Midwifery, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Karolinska Inst, Inst Environm Med, Musculoskeletal & Sports Injury Epidemiol Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Chronic pain; Craniosacral therapy; Complementary therapies; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; LOW-BACK-PAIN; ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE; CONTROL INTERVENTION; NERVOUS-SYSTEM; NECK PAIN; COMPLEMENTARY; CREDIBILITY; COMPRESSION; BENEFITS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-019-3017-y
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives To systematically assess the evidence of Craniosacral Therapy (CST) for the treatment of chronic pain. Methods PubMed, Central, Scopus, PsycInfo and Cinahl were searched up to August 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of CST in chronic pain patients were eligible. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for pain intensity and functional disability (primary outcomes) using Hedges' correction for small samples. Secondary outcomes included physical/mental quality of life, global improvement, and safety. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. Results Ten RCTs of 681 patients with neck and back pain, migraine, headache, fibromyalgia, epicondylitis, and pelvic girdle pain were included. CST showed greater post intervention effects on: pain intensity (SMD = -0.32, 95%CI = [- 0.61,-0.02]) and disability (SMD = -0.58, 95%CI = [- 0.92,-0.24]) compared to treatment as usual; on pain intensity (SMD = -0.63, 95%CI = [- 0.90,-0.37]) and disability (SMD = -0.54, 95%CI = [- 0.81,-0.28]) compared to manual/non-manual sham; and on pain intensity (SMD = -0.53, 95%CI = [- 0.89,-0.16]) and disability (SMD = -0.58, 95%CI = [- 0.95,-0.21]) compared to active manual treatments. At six months, CST showed greater effects on pain intensity (SMD = -0.59, 95%CI = [- 0.99,-0.19]) and disability (SMD = -0.53, 95%CI = [- 0.87,-0.19]) versus sham. Secondary outcomes were all significantly more improved in CST patients than in other groups, except for six-month mental quality of life versus sham. Sensitivity analyses revealed robust effects of CST against most risk of bias domains. Five of the 10 RCTs reported safety data. No serious adverse events occurred. Minor adverse events were equally distributed between the groups. Discussion In patients with chronic pain, this meta-analysis suggests significant and robust effects of CST on pain and function lasting up to six months. More RCTs strictly following CONSORT are needed to further corroborate the effects and safety of CST on chronic pain. Protocol registration at Prospero CRD42018111975.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy of Auricular Acupressure for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Yang, Li-Hua
    Duan, Pei-Bei
    Hou, Qing-Mei
    Du, Shi-Zheng
    Sun, Jin-Fang
    Mei, Si-Juan
    Wang, Xiao-Qing
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 2017
  • [42] Benefits and safety of gabapentinoids in chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Shanthanna, Harsha
    Gilron, Ian
    Rajarathinam, Manikandan
    AlAmri, Rizq
    Kamath, Sriganesh
    Thabane, Lehana
    Devereaux, Philip J.
    Bhandari, Mohit
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (08)
  • [43] Efficacy and safety of moxibustion for chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chen, Feng-qin
    Ge, Jian-feng
    Leng, Yu-fei
    Li, Cheng
    Chen, Bin
    Sun, Zhi-ling
    COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 39
  • [44] Efficacy of manual therapy for sacroiliac joint pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Trager, Robert J.
    Baumann, Anthony N.
    Rogers, Hudson
    Tidd, Joshua
    Orellana, Kevin
    Preston, Gordon
    Baldwin, Keith
    JOURNAL OF MANUAL & MANIPULATIVE THERAPY, 2024,
  • [45] Update evidence of effectiveness on pain relieving of cupping therapy:a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    WANG Yiying
    DONG Shuai
    LI Bo
    HAN Mei
    CAO Huijuan
    Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2025, 45 (02) : 234 - 253
  • [46] Using Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy in Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Huang, Qiangru
    Lin, Junqing
    Han, Rui
    Peng, Cheng
    Huang, Aji
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (02) : 288 - 301
  • [47] Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zhu, Gui-Qi
    Zou, Zhuo-Lin
    Zheng, Ji-Na
    Chen, Da-Zhi
    Zou, Tian-Tian
    Shi, Ke-Qing
    Zheng, Ming-Hua
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (09)
  • [48] Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Randomized Controlled Trials in Cytopathology
    AbdullGaffar, Badr
    ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2012, 56 (03) : 221 - 227
  • [49] injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Daou, Marietou
    Dionne, Joanna C.
    Teng, Jennifer F. T.
    Taran, Shaurya
    Zytaruk, Nicole
    Cook, Deborah
    Wilcox, M. Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 71
  • [50] Nutritional management of chronic pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wiese, Mats
    Gaertner, Simone
    Doller, Julia
    Tran, Trung Quang
    Frost, Fabian
    Bannert, Karen
    Jaster, Robert
    Berlin, Peggy
    Valentini, Luzia
    Meyer, Fatuma
    Metges, Cornelia C.
    Lamprecht, Georg
    Lerch, Markus M.
    Aghdassi, Ali A.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 36 (03) : 588 - 600