Who is more likely to ignore experts' advice related to COVID-19?

被引:16
作者
O'Shea, Brian A. [1 ,2 ]
Ueda, Michiko [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol, Roetersstr 15, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Harvard Univ, Dept Psychol, 33 Kirkland St, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Waseda Univ, Fac Polit Sci & Econ, Shinjuku City, Japan
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
COVID-19; Trust; Experts; Germ Aversion; Demographics; UNITED-STATES; ATTITUDES; TRUST; IMPLICIT; EXPLICIT; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101470
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Failing to adhere to COVID-19 experts' advice could have devastating consequences for individuals and communities. Here we determine which demographic factors can impact trust in COVID-19 experts. Participants consisted of more than 1875 online volunteers, primarily from the U.S. Survey data were collected before and after the first peak of the COVID-19 outbreak in the U.S. (28th of March-15th of May 2020). We consistently find that participants with a lower perceived socio-economic status, social conservatives, individualists, and participants who are less worried about COVID-19 are significantly more likely to support individuals who ignore the goverment's, scientists', medical professionals' COVID-19 advice. Regarding race, Black participants consistently (and Hispanics to a lesser degree) were more likely to support individuals who ignore the three expert groups relative to Whites. All these findings generalized to weaker trust towards public policy decision experts. Asian and other racial groups' trust was consistently lower than Whites, but primarily numerically, not statistically. Age and gender showed weak or inconsistent results respectively. We provide an enhanced understanding of the demographic factors that can result in individuals/groups ignoring COVID-19 experts. Lack of compliance could increase the transmission risks of the virus. Therefore, non-partisan campaigns that target individuals/groups who distrust COVID-19 experts will likely reduce COVID-19 related deaths. Increasing expert representatives' racial diversity may also increase trust among racial minorities.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PARTISANSHIP HLTH BE
[2]   Does Partisanship Shape Attitudes toward Science and Public Policy? The Case for Ideology and Religion [J].
Blank, Joshua M. ;
Shaw, Daron .
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2015, 658 (01) :18-35
[3]   Opposing ends of the spectrum: Exploring trust in scientific and religious authorities [J].
Cacciatore, Michael A. ;
Browning, Nick ;
Scheufele, Dietram A. ;
Brossard, Dominique ;
Xenos, Michael A. ;
Corley, Elizabeth A. .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2018, 27 (01) :11-28
[4]  
Cary, 2020, BLACK AM HAVE LESS C
[5]  
CDC. Centers for Disease Control, 2020, COMM SCH WORKPL EV
[6]   Patterns of Implicit and Explicit Attitudes: I. Long-Term Change and Stability From 2007 to 2016 [J].
Charlesworth, Tessa E. S. ;
Banaji, Mahzarin R. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 30 (02) :174-192
[7]  
Christakis N., 2020, APOLLOS ARROW PROFOU
[8]   Attitudes and beliefs of African Americans toward participation in medical research [J].
Corbie-Smith, G ;
Thomas, SB ;
Williams, MV ;
Moody-Ayers, S .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1999, 14 (09) :537-546
[9]   Ideological symmetries and asymmetries in political intolerance and prejudice toward political activist groups [J].
Crawford, Jarret T. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 55 :284-298
[10]  
Diehl M., 1990, EUR REV SOC PSYCHOL, V1, P263, DOI DOI 10.1080/14792779108401864