Experimental Validation of Robust Process Design and Control Based on Gaussian Mixture Densities

被引:0
作者
Rossner, N. [1 ]
King, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Berlin Inst Technol, Dept Measurement & Control, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
来源
IFAC PAPERSONLINE | 2015年 / 48卷 / 08期
关键词
Uncertain Dynamic Systems; Nonlinear Systems; Gaussian Distributions; Probabilistic Simulation; Reactor Control; Safety-Critical; Robust control; Validation;
D O I
10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.08.195
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this contribution, the effects of different degrees of uncertainty description are investigated experimentally using an exothermic chemical reaction with safety constraint on the temperature. For that purpose, two robust trajectories arc designed that respect the artificially created uncertainties of the experiments either coarsely using a single multivariate normal distribution (1GMD) or in a more detailed fashion using a Gaussian mixture density (GMD) consisting of 32 multivariate normal densities (32GMD). For the optimization, the uncertainties are propagated using the unscented transformation. Both trajectories were run 71 times in an open-loop manner. The more detailed trajectory (32GMD) leads to a 9% higher yield without increasing the risk of constraint violation. Furthermore, many experimental realizations of two robust closed-loop process control schemes are being compared. They differ again only in the degree of the underlying uncertainty description. Although the frequent corrections of the controller marginalize the advantage of a more detailed stochastic process prediction, the 4GMD-controller still allows for 3 % more educt conversion compared to the 1GMD-controller. (C) 2015, IFAC (International Federation of Automatic Control) Hosting by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 290
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1996, TECHNICAL REPORT
  • [2] Bray WC., 1931, J Am Chem Soc, V53, P38, DOI [DOI 10.1021/JA01352A006, 10.1021/ja01352a006]
  • [3] MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD FROM INCOMPLETE DATA VIA EM ALGORITHM
    DEMPSTER, AP
    LAIRD, NM
    RUBIN, DB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1977, 39 (01): : 1 - 38
  • [4] Efrom B., 1986, Statistical Science, V1, P54, DOI DOI 10.1214/SS/1177013815
  • [5] A new method for the nonlinear transformation of means and covariances in filters and estimators
    Julier, S
    Uhlmann, J
    Durrant-Whyte, HF
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2000, 45 (03) : 477 - 482
  • [6] Chance constrained programming approach to process optimization under uncertainty
    Li, Pu
    Arellano-Garcia, Harvey
    Wozny, Gunter
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 32 (1-2) : 25 - 45
  • [7] Liebhafsky H.A., 1933, J. Am. Chem. Soc, V55, P3977, DOI DOI 10.1021/JA01337A010
  • [8] Merwe R. V. D., 2004, Sigma-point Kalman filters for probabilistic inference in dynamic state-space models
  • [9] New developments in state estimation for nonlinear systems
    Norgaard, M
    Poulsen, NK
    Ravn, O
    [J]. AUTOMATICA, 2000, 36 (11) : 1627 - 1638
  • [10] Rossner N., 2010, IFAC PROC VOL, V43, P7, DOI [10.3182/20100707-3-BE-2012.0035, DOI 10.3182/20100707-3-BE-2012.0035]