Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?

被引:3275
作者
Baumeister, RF [1 ]
Bratslavsky, E [1 ]
Muraven, M [1 ]
Tice, DM [1 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Psychol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Choice, active response, self-regulation, and other volition may all draw on a common inner resource. In Experiment I, people who forced themselves to eat radishes instead of tempting chocolates subsequently quit faster on unsolvable puzzles than people who had not had to exert self-control over eating. In Experiment 2, making a meaningful personal choice to perform attitude-relevant behavior caused a similar decrement in persistence. In Experiment 3, suppressing emotion led to a subsequent drop in performance of solvable anagrams. In Experiment 4, an initial task requiring high self-regulation made people more passive (i.e., more prone to favor the passive-response option). These results suggest that the self's capacity for active volition is limited and that a range of seemingly different, unrelated acts share a common resource.
引用
收藏
页码:1252 / 1265
页数:14
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   THE FEATURE-POSITIVE EFFECT, ATTITUDE STRENGTH, AND DEGREE OF PERCEIVED CONSENSUS [J].
ALLISON, ST ;
MESSICK, DM .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1988, 14 (02) :231-241
[2]  
BANAJI MR, 1994, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V45, P297, DOI 10.1146/annurev.psych.45.1.297
[3]  
Bargh J., 1997, ADV SOC COG, V10, P1
[4]  
Bargh J.A., 1994, Handbook of social cognition, V2, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/S00572-005-0022-9
[6]  
Baumeister R.F., 1998, HDB SOCIAL PSYCHOL, V2, P680
[7]  
Baumeister RF., 1994, LOSING CONTROL WHY P
[8]  
Brehm JW., 1966, THEORY PSYCHOL REACT
[9]   FACTORS AFFECTING WITHDRAWAL FROM AN ESCALATING CONFLICT - QUITTING BEFORE ITS TOO LATE [J].
BROCKNER, J ;
SHAW, MC ;
RUBIN, JZ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 15 (05) :492-503
[10]   NEGATIVE REACTIONS TO INCREASES IN PERCEIVED PERSONAL CONTROL [J].
BURGER, JM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 56 (02) :246-256