Multi-objective optimization of water supply network rehabilitation

被引:0
作者
Wu, Wenyan [1 ]
Jin, Xi [2 ]
Gao, Jinliang [3 ]
机构
[1] Staffordshire Univ, Fac Comp Engn & Technol, Stafford ST18 0DF, Staffs, England
[2] Wuhan Univ Technol, Dept Municipal Engn, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[3] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Municipal & Environm Engn, Harbin 15009, Peoples R China
来源
2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS (SMC 2009), VOLS 1-9 | 2009年
关键词
water supply system; water supply network; optimal rehabilitation; multi-objective; non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA); GENETIC ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1109/ICSMC.2009.5346824
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Water network rehabilitation is a complex problem, and many facets should be concerned in the solving process. It is a discrete variables, non-linear, multi-objective optimal problem. An optimization approach is discussed in this paper by transforming the hydraulic constraints into objective functions of optimization model of water supply network rehabilitation problem. The non-dominated sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II) was adopted to solve the altered multi-objective optimal problem. The introduction of NSGA-II for water supply network optimal rehabilitation problem results in solving the conflict between one fitness value of standard genetic algorithm (SGA) and multi-objectives of rehabilitation problem. Moreover, it benefits to control the uncertainties brought by using weighting coefficients or punish functions in conventional methods. In order to accelerate the convergence speed of population, this paper introduces the artificial inducement mutation (AIM). It not only improves the convergence speed, but also improves the rationality and feasibility of solutions.
引用
收藏
页码:3534 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
    Deb, K
    Pratap, A
    Agarwal, S
    Meyarivan, T
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) : 182 - 197
  • [2] Deb K., 2010, MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIM
  • [3] Engelhardt MO., 2000, Urban Water, V2, P153, DOI [10.1016/S1462-0758(00)00053-4, DOI 10.1016/S1462-0758(00)00053-4]
  • [4] ENGELHARDT MO, 1999, DEV STRATEGY OPTIMUM, P262
  • [5] Water network rehabilitation with structured messy genetic algorithm
    Halhal, D
    Walters, GA
    Ouazar, D
    Savic, DA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 123 (03) : 137 - 146
  • [6] Introducing more choices (flexibility) in the upgrading of water distribution networks: the New York city tunnel network example
    Khu, ST
    Keedwell, E
    [J]. ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2005, 37 (03) : 291 - 305
  • [7] Quantitative parametric connections between methods for generating noninferior solutions in multiobjective optimization
    Li, D
    Yang, JB
    Biswal, MP
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 117 (01) : 84 - 99
  • [8] [卜义惠 Pu Yihui], 2003, [给水排水, Water & wastewater engineering], V29, P89
  • [9] Rossman L., 1993, EPANET USERS MANUAL
  • [10] Walski T.M., 1982, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V108, P296