Indicators for monitoring biological invasions at a national level

被引:48
作者
Wilson, John R. U. [1 ,2 ]
Faulkner, Katelyn T. [1 ,3 ]
Rahlao, Sebataolo J. [1 ,2 ]
Richardson, David M. [2 ]
Zengeya, Tsungai A. [1 ,3 ]
van Wilgen, Brian W. [2 ]
机构
[1] South African Natl Biodivers Inst, Kirstenbosch Res Ctr, Claremont, South Africa
[2] Stellenbosch Univ, Dept Bot & Zool, Ctr Invas Biol, Matieland, South Africa
[3] Univ Pretoria, Dept Zool & Entomol, Ctr Invas Biol, Hatfield, Herts, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Aichi Target 9; biodiversity indicators framework; biological invasions; invasive alien species; monitoring and reporting; South Africa; status report; SOUTH-AFRICA; ALIEN PLANTS; IMPACT CLASSIFICATION; FRAMEWORK; TAXA; PATHWAYS; POLICY; DEBT;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2664.13251
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
1. A major challenge for the management of biological invasions is to ensure that data and information from basic inventories and ecological research are used alongside data from the monitoring and evaluation of interventions to trigger and improve policy and management responses. To address this issue, South Africa has committed to report on the status of biological invasions and their management every 3 years. 2. We propose a framework of indicators for reporting on biological invasions at a country level; assess the feasibility of the indicators using South Africa as a case study; and outline steps needed for indicator development. 3. We argue that a national status report on biological invasions should explicitly consider indicators for pathways, species, and sites, and should report on interventions in terms of inputs, outputs, and outcomes. 4. We propose 20 indicators based on data currently available, as well as existing international policy initiatives. For each indicator, we have developed a factsheet that includes different hierarchical metrics (considering data availability) and provide suggestions on assigning confidence levels. We also combine these indicators into four high-level indicators to facilitate broader reporting and describe how forecasted indicators based on the concept of invasion debt could assist with scenario planning. 5. We found that many of the data required for these indicators are already available in South Africa, but they have been poorly collated to date. However, data for the indicators of most direct value to policy and planning-those dealing with the impact of biological invasions and the outcome of interventions-are scarce. 6. Policy implications. The framework of indicators developed here, for what we believe is the first ever national-level report on the status of biological invasions and their management, will facilitate the inclusion of biological invasions in environmental reporting at national and international levels. By identifying knowledge gaps, a status report will also focus efforts on determining the size of a country's invasion debt and what can be done to reduce it.
引用
收藏
页码:2612 / 2620
页数:9
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Socio-economic impact classification of alien taxa (SEICAT)
    Bacher, Sven
    Blackburn, Tim M.
    Essl, Franz
    Genovesi, Piero
    Heikkila, Jaakko
    Jeschke, Jonathan M.
    Jones, Glyn
    Keller, Reuben
    Kenis, Marc
    Kueffer, Christoph
    Martinou, Angeliki F.
    Nentwig, Wolfgang
    Pergl, Jan
    Pysek, Petr
    Rabitsch, Wolfgang
    Richardson, David M.
    Roy, Helen E.
    Saul, Wolf-Christian
    Scalera, Riccardo
    Vila, Montserrat
    Wilson, John R. U.
    Kumschick, Sabrina
    [J]. METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2018, 9 (01): : 159 - 168
  • [2] Gaps in Border Controls Are Related to Quarantine Alien Insect Invasions in Europe
    Bacon, Steven James
    Bacher, Sven
    Aebi, Alexandre
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (10):
  • [3] Biodiversity Indicators Partnership, 2011, GUID NAT BIOD IND DE
  • [4] A Unified Classification of Alien Species Based on the Magnitude of their Environmental Impacts
    Blackburn, Tim M.
    Essl, Franz
    Evans, Thomas
    Hulme, Philip E.
    Jeschke, Jonathan M.
    Kuehn, Ingolf
    Kumschick, Sabrina
    Markova, Zuzana
    Mrugala, Agata
    Nentwig, Wolfgang
    Pergl, Jan
    Pysek, Petr
    Rabitsch, Wolfgang
    Ricciardi, Anthony
    Richardson, David M.
    Sendek, Agnieszka
    Vila, Montserrat
    Wilson, John R. U.
    Winter, Marten
    Genovesi, Piero
    Bacher, Sven
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2014, 12 (05)
  • [5] A proposed unified framework for biological invasions
    Blackburn, Tim M.
    Pysek, Petr
    Bacher, Sven
    Carlton, James T.
    Duncan, Richard P.
    Jarosik, Vojtech
    Wilson, John R. U.
    Richardson, David M.
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2011, 26 (07) : 333 - 339
  • [6] Quantifying levels of biological invasion: towards the objective classification of invaded and invasible ecosystems
    Catford, Jane A.
    Vesk, Peter A.
    Richardson, David M.
    Pysek, Petr
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2012, 18 (01) : 44 - 62
  • [7] Invasive species management will benefit from social impact assessment
    Crowley, Sarah L.
    Hinchliffe, Steve
    McDonald, Robbie A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2017, 54 (02) : 351 - 357
  • [8] An economic assessment of the contribution of biological control to the management of invasive alien plants and to the protection of ecosystem services in South Africa
    de Lange, Willem J.
    van Wilgen, Brian W.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2010, 12 (12) : 4113 - 4124
  • [9] Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities
    Early, Regan
    Bradley, Bethany A.
    Dukes, Jeffrey S.
    Lawler, Joshua J.
    Olden, Julian D.
    Blumenthal, Dana M.
    Gonzalez, Patrick
    Grosholz, Edwin D.
    Ibanez, Ines
    Miller, Luke P.
    Sorte, Cascade J. B.
    Tatem, Andrew J.
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 7
  • [10] How wide is the "knowing-doing" gap in invasion biology?
    Esler, Karen J.
    Prozesky, Heidi
    Sharma, Gyan P.
    McGeoch, Melodie
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2010, 12 (12) : 4065 - 4075