Greater Visual Working Memory Capacity for Visually Matched Stimuli When They Are Perceived as Meaningful

被引:55
作者
Asp, Isabel E. [1 ]
Stormer, Viola S. [1 ,2 ]
Brady, Timothy F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Dartmouth Coll, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
关键词
SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; CONTRALATERAL DELAY ACTIVITY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; NEURAL MEASURES; OBJECTS; NUMBER; REPRESENTATIONS; MECHANISMS; STORAGE; LIMITS;
D O I
10.1162/jocn_a_01693
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Almost all models of visual working memory-the cognitive system that holds visual information in an active state-assume it has a fixed capacity: Some models propose a limit of three to four objects, where others propose there is a fixed pool of resources for each basic visual feature. Recent findings, however, suggest that memory performance is improved for real-world objects. What supports these increases in capacity? Here, we test whether the meaningfulness of a stimulus alone influences working memory capacity while controlling for visual complexity and directly assessing the active component of working memory using EEG. Participants remembered ambiguous stimuli that could either be perceived as a face or as meaningless shapes. Participants had higher performance and increased neural delay activity when the memory display consisted of more meaningful stimuli. Critically, by asking participants whether they perceived the stimuli as a face or not, we also show that these increases in visual working memory capacity and recruitment of additional neural resources are because of the subjective perception of the stimulus and thus cannot be driven by physical properties of the stimulus. Broadly, this suggests that the capacity for active storage in visual working memory is not fixed but that more meaningful stimuli recruit additional working memory resources, allowing them to be better remembered.
引用
收藏
页码:902 / 918
页数:17
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects [J].
Alvarez, GA ;
Cavanagh, P .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (02) :106-111
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1967, STAT BIOL STAT METHO, DOI DOI 10.1002/BIMJ.19690110327
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1932, REMEMBERING EXPT SOC
[4]   Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity [J].
Awh, Edward ;
Barton, Brian ;
Vogel, Edward K. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 18 (07) :622-628
[5]   Mixed-effects models in psychophysiology [J].
Bagiella, E ;
Sloan, RP ;
Heitjan, DF .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 37 (01) :13-20
[6]   Spikes not slots: noise neural populations limits working memory [J].
Bays, Paul M. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2015, 19 (08) :431-438
[7]   The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource [J].
Bays, Paul M. ;
Catalao, Raquel F. G. ;
Husain, Masud .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2009, 9 (10)
[8]   COMPREHENSION AND MEMORY FOR PICTURES [J].
BOWER, GH ;
KARLIN, MB ;
DUECK, A .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1975, 3 (02) :216-220
[9]  
Brady T. F., 2020, Memory & Cognition, DOI [10.31234/osf.io/25t76, DOI 10.31234/OSF.IO/25T76]
[10]   The Role of Meaning in Visual Memory: Face-Selective Brain Activity Predicts Memory for Ambiguous Face Stimuli [J].
Brady, Timothy F. ;
Alvarez, George A. ;
Stormer, Viola S. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 39 (06) :1100-1108