Trump and Muslims: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Islamophobic Rhetoric in Donald Trump's Selected Tweets

被引:10
|
作者
Khan, Mohsin Hassan [1 ,2 ]
Qazalbash, Farwa [3 ]
Adnan, Hamedi Mohd [2 ]
Yaqin, Lalu Nurul [4 ]
Khuhro, Rashid Ali [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Management & Technol, Sch Media & Commun Studies, C-2 Johar Town, Lahore 54782, Pakistan
[2] Univ Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[3] Kinnaird Coll Women, Lahore, Pakistan
[4] Univ Gunung Rinjani, Selong, Indonesia
[5] Univ Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan
来源
SAGE OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
Donald Trump; US 2016 presidential elections; Twitter; Islamophobia; critical discourse studies; us versus them; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REPRESENTATION; ELECTION; TWITTER; MEDIA; ISLAM; CAMPAIGN; ONLINE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/21582440211004172
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The emergence of Donald Trump as an anti-Muslim-Islam presidential candidate and victory over Hillary Clinton is an issue of debate and division in the United States' political sphere. Many commentators and political pundits criticize Trump for his disparaging rhetoric on Twitter and present him as an example of how Twitter can be an effective tool for the construction and extension of political polarization. The current study analyzes the selected tweets by Donald Trump posted on Twitter to unmask how he uses language to construct Islamophobic discourse structures and attempts to form his ideological structures along with. The researchers hypothesize that Islamophobia is a marked feature of Trump's political career realized by specific rhetorical and discursive devices. Therefore, the study purposively takes 40 most controversial tweets of Donald Trump against Islam and Muslims and carried out a critical discourse analysis with the help of macro-strategies of the discourse given by Wodak and Meyer and van Dijk's referential strategies of political discourse. The findings reveal that Trump uses language rhetorically to exclude people of different ethnic identities, especially Muslims, through demagogic language to create a difference of "us" vs. "them" and making in this way "America Great Again".
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] IMPOLITENESS IN TWITTER DISCOURSE: A CASE STUDY OF REPLIES TO DONALD TRUMP AND GRETA THUNBERG
    Salimi, Esmaeel Ali
    Mortazavi, Seyed Mohammadreza
    BALTIC JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LITERATURE AND CULTURE, 2024, 14 : 86 - 107
  • [42] Does Bitcoin React to Trump's Tweets?
    Toan Luu Duc Huynh
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FINANCE, 2021, 31
  • [43] Out-grouping and ambient affiliation in Donald Trump's tweets about Iran Exploring the role of negative evaluation in enacting solidarity
    Makki, Mohammad
    Zappavigna, Michele
    PRAGMATICS, 2022, 32 (01): : 104 - 130
  • [44] Donald Trump and the Legacy of Bacon's Rebellion
    Tatum, Dale Craig
    JOURNAL OF BLACK STUDIES, 2017, 48 (07) : 651 - 674
  • [45] Donald Trump's Impact on the Republican Party
    Espinoza, Michael
    POLICY STUDIES, 2021, 42 (5-6) : 563 - 579
  • [46] The impact of US presidents on market returns: Evidence from Trump?s tweets
    Pham, Duong Phuong Thao
    Huynh, Ngoc Quang Anh
    Duong, Duy
    RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2022, 62
  • [47] The Readability and Simplicity of Donald Trump's Language
    Kayam, Orly
    POLITICAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2018, 16 (01) : 73 - 88
  • [48] Hyman Minsky's interpretation of Donald Trump
    Capehart, Kevin W.
    JOURNAL OF POST KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS, 2015, 38 (03) : 477 - 492
  • [49] Do President Trump's tweets affect financial markets?
    Gjerstad, Peder
    Meyn, Peter Filip
    Molnar, Peter
    Naess, Thomas Dowling
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2021, 147
  • [50] Trump Knows Best: Donald Trump’s Rejection of Expertise and the 2020 Presidential Election
    Mark D. Brewer
    Society, 2020, 57 : 657 - 661