Objective assessment of minimally invasive total mesorectal excision performance: a systematic review

被引:5
|
作者
Curtis, N. J. [1 ,2 ]
Davids, J. [1 ]
Foster, J. D. [1 ,2 ]
Francis, N. K. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Yeovil Dist Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Gen Surg, Clin Res Unit, Yeovil BA21 4AT, Somerset, England
[2] Imperial Coll London, St Marys Hosp, Dept Surg & Canc, Praed St, London, England
[3] Univ Bath, Fac Sci, Wessex House 3-22, Bath, Somerset, England
关键词
Assessment; Laparoscopy; Rectal; Surgery; Systematic review; LAPAROSCOPIC-COLORECTAL-SURGERY; NATIONAL-TRAINING-PROGRAM; ASSESSING OPERATIVE PERFORMANCE; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS OCHRA; MRC CLASICC TRIAL; LOW-RECTAL-CANCER; ASSISTED RESECTION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; PATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10151-017-1614-z
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Laparoscopy is widely used in colorectal practice, but recent trial results have questioned its use in rectal cancer resections. Patient outcomes are directly linked to the quality of total mesorectal excision (TME) specimen. Objective assessment of intraoperative performance could help ensure competence and delivery of optimal outcomes. Objective tools may also contribute to TME intervention trials, but their nature, structure and utilisation is unknown. Aim To systemically review the available literature to report on the available tools for the objective assessment of minimally invasive TME operative performance and their use within multicentre laparoscopic TME randomised controlled trials. Methods A systematic search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed to identify tools used in the objective intraoperative assessment of minimally invasive TME performance in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, independently by two authors. The identified tools were then evaluated within reported TME RCTs. Results A total of 8642 abstracts were screened of which 12 papers met the inclusion criteria; ten prospective observational studies, one randomised trial and one educational consensus. Eight assessment methods were described, which include formative and summative tools. The tools were mostly adaptations of colonic surgery tools based on either operative video review or post-operative trainer rating. All studies reported objective assessment of intraoperative performance was feasible, but only 126 (7%) of the 1762 included laparoscopic cases were TME. No multicentre laparoscopic TME trial reported using any objective surgical performance assessment tool. Conclusion Objective intraoperative laparoscopic TME performance assessment is feasible, but most of the current tools are adaptation of colonic surgery. There is a need to develop dedicated assessment tools for minimal access rectal surgery. No multicentre minimally invasive TME RCT reported using any objective assessment tool.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 268
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robotic beyond total mesorectal excision (TME) for locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer: a systematic review protocol
    Panagiotopoulou, Ioanna Georgiou
    Przedlacka, Anna
    Piozzi, Guglielmo Niccolo
    Mills, Graham A.
    Harper, Mick
    Khan, Jim S.
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [42] Development and evaluation of a virtual knowledge assessment tool for transanal total mesorectal excision
    Hamzeh Naghawi
    Johnny Chau
    Amin Madani
    Pepa Kaneva
    John Monson
    Carmen Mueller
    Lawrence Lee
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2022, 26 : 551 - 560
  • [43] Minimally Invasive Lymphadenectomy in Uterine Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Rizou, Natasa
    Moris, Demetrios
    Pikoulis, Emmanouil
    Dimitrokallis, Nikolaos
    Mpaili, Eustratia
    Felekouras, Evangelos
    Papalampros, Alexandros
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 37 (01) : 335 - 342
  • [44] Statistical, Clinical, Methodological Evaluation of Local Recurrence Following Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Wasmuth, Hans H.
    Gachabayov, Mahir
    Bokey, Les
    Fingerhut, Abe
    Orangio, Guy R.
    Remzi, Feza H.
    Bergamaschi, Roberto
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2021, 64 (07) : 899 - 914
  • [45] Universalization of the operative strategy by systematic mesogastric excision for stomach cancer with that for total mesorectal excision and complete mesocolic excision colorectal counterparts
    Shinohara, Hisashi
    Kurahashi, Yasunori
    Haruta, Shusuke
    Ishida, Yoshinori
    Sasako, Mitsuru
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2018, 2 (01): : 28 - 36
  • [46] Systematic Review of Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Resection
    Briggs, Christopher D.
    Mann, Christopher D.
    Irving, Glen R. B.
    Neal, Christopher P.
    Peterson, Mark
    Cameron, Iain C.
    Berry, David P.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2009, 13 (06) : 1129 - 1137
  • [47] Pathological outcomes of transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Jiang, Hong-Peng
    Li, Yan-Sen
    Wang, Bo
    Wang, Chang
    Liu, Fan
    Shen, Zhan-Long
    Ye, Ying-Jiang
    Wang, Shan
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (06): : 2632 - 2642
  • [48] Important outcomes for transanal total mesorectal excision in a Canadian population after using transanal minimally invasive surgery (flexible) or transanal endoscopic microsurgery (rigid) platforms
    Caycedo-Marulanda, Antonio
    Karimuddin, Ahmer
    Caswell, Joseph
    Raval, Manoj
    Conlon, Michael
    Phang, Terry
    Brown, Carl
    ANNALS OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2020, 5
  • [49] Does previous transanal excision for early rectal cancer impair surgical outcomes and pathologic findings of completion total mesorectal excision? Results of a systematic review of the literature
    Eid, Y.
    Alves, A.
    Lubrano, J.
    Menahem, B.
    JOURNAL OF VISCERAL SURGERY, 2018, 155 (06) : 445 - 452
  • [50] Transanal total mesorectal excision for primary rectovaginal carcinosarcoma: A case report and literature review
    Onishi, Takuto
    Amano, Tsukuru
    Miyake, Toru
    Nakamura, Akiko
    Yoneoka, Yutaka
    Nisimura, Hiroki
    Tsuji, Shunichiro
    Tani, Masaji
    Murakami, Takashi
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2023, 49 (02) : 763 - 768