Objective assessment of minimally invasive total mesorectal excision performance: a systematic review

被引:5
|
作者
Curtis, N. J. [1 ,2 ]
Davids, J. [1 ]
Foster, J. D. [1 ,2 ]
Francis, N. K. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Yeovil Dist Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Gen Surg, Clin Res Unit, Yeovil BA21 4AT, Somerset, England
[2] Imperial Coll London, St Marys Hosp, Dept Surg & Canc, Praed St, London, England
[3] Univ Bath, Fac Sci, Wessex House 3-22, Bath, Somerset, England
关键词
Assessment; Laparoscopy; Rectal; Surgery; Systematic review; LAPAROSCOPIC-COLORECTAL-SURGERY; NATIONAL-TRAINING-PROGRAM; ASSESSING OPERATIVE PERFORMANCE; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS OCHRA; MRC CLASICC TRIAL; LOW-RECTAL-CANCER; ASSISTED RESECTION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; PATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10151-017-1614-z
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Laparoscopy is widely used in colorectal practice, but recent trial results have questioned its use in rectal cancer resections. Patient outcomes are directly linked to the quality of total mesorectal excision (TME) specimen. Objective assessment of intraoperative performance could help ensure competence and delivery of optimal outcomes. Objective tools may also contribute to TME intervention trials, but their nature, structure and utilisation is unknown. Aim To systemically review the available literature to report on the available tools for the objective assessment of minimally invasive TME operative performance and their use within multicentre laparoscopic TME randomised controlled trials. Methods A systematic search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed to identify tools used in the objective intraoperative assessment of minimally invasive TME performance in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, independently by two authors. The identified tools were then evaluated within reported TME RCTs. Results A total of 8642 abstracts were screened of which 12 papers met the inclusion criteria; ten prospective observational studies, one randomised trial and one educational consensus. Eight assessment methods were described, which include formative and summative tools. The tools were mostly adaptations of colonic surgery tools based on either operative video review or post-operative trainer rating. All studies reported objective assessment of intraoperative performance was feasible, but only 126 (7%) of the 1762 included laparoscopic cases were TME. No multicentre laparoscopic TME trial reported using any objective surgical performance assessment tool. Conclusion Objective intraoperative laparoscopic TME performance assessment is feasible, but most of the current tools are adaptation of colonic surgery. There is a need to develop dedicated assessment tools for minimal access rectal surgery. No multicentre minimally invasive TME RCT reported using any objective assessment tool.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 268
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of local excision and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trial
    Meng, Zan
    Liu, Zehong
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (09)
  • [32] OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL SKILLS
    Panahi, Ali Keshavarz
    Cho, Sohyung
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, 2013, VOL 3A, 2014,
  • [33] Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer: A Narrative Review and Description of the Technique
    Formisano, Giampaolo
    Ferraro, Luca
    Salaj, Adelona
    Giuratrabocchetta, Simona
    Piccolo, Gaetano
    Di Raimondo, Giulia
    Bianchi, Paolo Pietro
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (14)
  • [34] Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Versus Transanal Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
    Simillis, Constantinos
    Lal, Nikhil
    Thoukididou, Sarah N.
    Kontovounisios, Christos
    Smith, Jason J.
    Hompes, Roel
    Adamina, Michel
    Tekkis, Paris P.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 270 (01) : 59 - 68
  • [35] Manometric assessment of anorectal function after transanal total mesorectal excision
    Bjorn, M. X.
    Perdawood, S. K.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2020, 24 (03) : 231 - 236
  • [36] An assessment of an Australasian pathway for the introduction of transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME)
    Abbott, S. C.
    Stevenson, A. R. L.
    Bell, S. W.
    Clark, D.
    Merrie, A.
    Hayes, J.
    Ganesh, S.
    Heriot, A. G.
    Warrier, S. K.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 20 (01) : O1 - O6
  • [37] Technical assessment in minimally invasive complete mesocolic excision: Is the complete mesocolic excision competency assessment tool valid and reliable?
    Haug, Tora Rydtun
    Orntoft, Mai-Britt Worm
    Miskovic, Danilo
    Iversen, Lene Hjerrild
    Johnsen, Soren Paaske
    Valentin, Jan Brink
    Ruiz, Marcos Gomez
    Benz, Stefan
    Eeg Storli, Kristian
    Stearns, Adam T.
    Madsen, Anders Husted
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 25 (11) : 2139 - 2146
  • [38] Peri-operative, oncological and functional outcomes of robotic versus transanal total mesorectal excision in patients with rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mohamedahmed, A. Y. Y.
    Zaman, S.
    Wuheb, A. A.
    Ismail, A.
    Nnaji, M.
    Alyamani, A. A.
    Eltyeb, H. A.
    Yassin, N. A.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2024, 28 (01)
  • [39] A systematic review of cancer related patient outcomes after anterior resection and abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer in the total mesorectal excision era
    How, P.
    Shihab, O.
    Tekkis, P.
    Brown, Gina
    Quirke, P.
    Heald, R.
    Moran, B.
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2011, 20 (04): : E149 - E155
  • [40] The learning curve of laparoscopic, robot-assisted and transanal total mesorectal excisions: a systematic review
    Burghgraef, Thijs A.
    Sikkenk, Daan J.
    Verheijen, Paul M.
    El Moumni, Mostafa
    Hompes, Roel
    Consten, Esther C. J.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (09): : 6337 - 6360