Objective assessment of minimally invasive total mesorectal excision performance: a systematic review

被引:5
|
作者
Curtis, N. J. [1 ,2 ]
Davids, J. [1 ]
Foster, J. D. [1 ,2 ]
Francis, N. K. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Yeovil Dist Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Gen Surg, Clin Res Unit, Yeovil BA21 4AT, Somerset, England
[2] Imperial Coll London, St Marys Hosp, Dept Surg & Canc, Praed St, London, England
[3] Univ Bath, Fac Sci, Wessex House 3-22, Bath, Somerset, England
关键词
Assessment; Laparoscopy; Rectal; Surgery; Systematic review; LAPAROSCOPIC-COLORECTAL-SURGERY; NATIONAL-TRAINING-PROGRAM; ASSESSING OPERATIVE PERFORMANCE; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS OCHRA; MRC CLASICC TRIAL; LOW-RECTAL-CANCER; ASSISTED RESECTION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; PATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10151-017-1614-z
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Laparoscopy is widely used in colorectal practice, but recent trial results have questioned its use in rectal cancer resections. Patient outcomes are directly linked to the quality of total mesorectal excision (TME) specimen. Objective assessment of intraoperative performance could help ensure competence and delivery of optimal outcomes. Objective tools may also contribute to TME intervention trials, but their nature, structure and utilisation is unknown. Aim To systemically review the available literature to report on the available tools for the objective assessment of minimally invasive TME operative performance and their use within multicentre laparoscopic TME randomised controlled trials. Methods A systematic search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed to identify tools used in the objective intraoperative assessment of minimally invasive TME performance in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, independently by two authors. The identified tools were then evaluated within reported TME RCTs. Results A total of 8642 abstracts were screened of which 12 papers met the inclusion criteria; ten prospective observational studies, one randomised trial and one educational consensus. Eight assessment methods were described, which include formative and summative tools. The tools were mostly adaptations of colonic surgery tools based on either operative video review or post-operative trainer rating. All studies reported objective assessment of intraoperative performance was feasible, but only 126 (7%) of the 1762 included laparoscopic cases were TME. No multicentre laparoscopic TME trial reported using any objective surgical performance assessment tool. Conclusion Objective intraoperative laparoscopic TME performance assessment is feasible, but most of the current tools are adaptation of colonic surgery. There is a need to develop dedicated assessment tools for minimal access rectal surgery. No multicentre minimally invasive TME RCT reported using any objective assessment tool.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 268
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Systematic review of the feasibility of sparing the rectoprostatic fascia in male patients undergoing total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
    Nikolouzakis, T. K.
    Gouvas, N.
    Athanasakis, E.
    Mariolis-Sapsakos, T.
    Chrysos, E.
    Tsiaoussis, J.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2025, 29 (01)
  • [22] Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a single center experience and systematic review of the literature
    de'Angelis, Nicola
    Portigliotti, Luca
    Azoulay, Daniel
    Brunetti, Francesco
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2015, 400 (08) : 945 - 959
  • [23] Development and evaluation of a virtual knowledge assessment tool for transanal total mesorectal excision
    Naghawi, Hamzeh
    Chau, Johnny
    Madani, Amin
    Kaneva, Pepa
    Monson, John
    Mueller, Carmen
    Lee, Lawrence
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2022, 26 (07) : 551 - 560
  • [24] Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a single center experience and systematic review of the literature
    Nicola de’Angelis
    Luca Portigliotti
    Daniel Azoulay
    Francesco Brunetti
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2015, 400 : 945 - 959
  • [25] Clinical and oncologic outcomes of totally robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: initial results in a center for minimally invasive surgery
    Chang-Nam Kim
    Sung Uk Bae
    Seul-Gi Lee
    Seung Hyun Yang
    In Gun Hyun
    Je Ho Jang
    Byung Sun Cho
    Joo Seung Park
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2016, 31 : 843 - 852
  • [26] Required distal mesorectal resection margin in partial mesorectal excision: a systematic review on distal mesorectal spread
    Gruter, A. A. J.
    van Lieshout, A. S.
    van Oostendorp, S. E.
    Ket, J. C. F.
    Tenhagen, M.
    den Boer, F. C.
    Hompes, R.
    Tanis, P. J.
    Tuynman, J. B.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2023, 27 (01) : 11 - 21
  • [27] Total Mesorectal Excision with New Robotic Platforms: A Scoping Review
    Marchegiani, Francesco
    Schena, Carlo Alberto
    Santambrogio, Gaia
    Emma, Emilio Paolo
    Tsimailo, Ivan
    de'Angelis, Nicola
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (21)
  • [28] A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological outcomes with transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
    Neary, Emma
    Ibrahim, Tarek
    Verschoor, Chris P.
    Zhang, Lisa
    Patel, Sunil V.
    Chadi, Sami A.
    Caycedo-Marulanda, Antonio
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2024, 26 (05) : 837 - 850
  • [29] Systematic review of transanal total mesorectal excision literature according to the ideal framework: The evolution never ends
    Persiani, Roberto
    Lorenzon, Laura
    Marincola, Giuseppe
    Santocchi, Pietro
    Tedesco, Silvia
    Biondi, Alberto
    SURGERY, 2021, 170 (04) : 1054 - 1060
  • [30] P338: summarizing measures of proficiency in transanal total mesorectal excision-a systematic review
    Antoun, Alen
    Chau, Johnny
    Alsharqawi, Nourah
    Kaneva, Pepa
    Feldman, Liane S.
    Mueller, Carmen L.
    Lee, Lawrence
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (08): : 4817 - 4824