Objective assessment of minimally invasive total mesorectal excision performance: a systematic review

被引:5
|
作者
Curtis, N. J. [1 ,2 ]
Davids, J. [1 ]
Foster, J. D. [1 ,2 ]
Francis, N. K. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Yeovil Dist Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Gen Surg, Clin Res Unit, Yeovil BA21 4AT, Somerset, England
[2] Imperial Coll London, St Marys Hosp, Dept Surg & Canc, Praed St, London, England
[3] Univ Bath, Fac Sci, Wessex House 3-22, Bath, Somerset, England
关键词
Assessment; Laparoscopy; Rectal; Surgery; Systematic review; LAPAROSCOPIC-COLORECTAL-SURGERY; NATIONAL-TRAINING-PROGRAM; ASSESSING OPERATIVE PERFORMANCE; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS OCHRA; MRC CLASICC TRIAL; LOW-RECTAL-CANCER; ASSISTED RESECTION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; PATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10151-017-1614-z
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Laparoscopy is widely used in colorectal practice, but recent trial results have questioned its use in rectal cancer resections. Patient outcomes are directly linked to the quality of total mesorectal excision (TME) specimen. Objective assessment of intraoperative performance could help ensure competence and delivery of optimal outcomes. Objective tools may also contribute to TME intervention trials, but their nature, structure and utilisation is unknown. Aim To systemically review the available literature to report on the available tools for the objective assessment of minimally invasive TME operative performance and their use within multicentre laparoscopic TME randomised controlled trials. Methods A systematic search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed to identify tools used in the objective intraoperative assessment of minimally invasive TME performance in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, independently by two authors. The identified tools were then evaluated within reported TME RCTs. Results A total of 8642 abstracts were screened of which 12 papers met the inclusion criteria; ten prospective observational studies, one randomised trial and one educational consensus. Eight assessment methods were described, which include formative and summative tools. The tools were mostly adaptations of colonic surgery tools based on either operative video review or post-operative trainer rating. All studies reported objective assessment of intraoperative performance was feasible, but only 126 (7%) of the 1762 included laparoscopic cases were TME. No multicentre laparoscopic TME trial reported using any objective surgical performance assessment tool. Conclusion Objective intraoperative laparoscopic TME performance assessment is feasible, but most of the current tools are adaptation of colonic surgery. There is a need to develop dedicated assessment tools for minimal access rectal surgery. No multicentre minimally invasive TME RCT reported using any objective assessment tool.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 268
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Objective assessment of minimally invasive total mesorectal excision performance: a systematic review
    N. J. Curtis
    J. Davids
    J. D. Foster
    N. K. Francis
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2017, 21 : 259 - 268
  • [2] A systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive total mesorectal excision versus transanal total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer
    Gang, Du Yong
    Dong, Lin
    DeChun, Zhang
    Yichi, Zhang
    Ya, Lu
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [3] Short-term Outcomes of Transanal versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies
    Wu, Zhiyuan
    Zhou, Wenlong
    Chen, Fu
    Wang, Wentao
    Feng, Yong
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 10 (02): : 341 - 354
  • [4] The role of MRI pelvimetry in predicting technical difficulty and outcomes of open and minimally invasive total mesorectal excision: a systematic review
    Hong, J. S. -Y.
    Brown, K. G. M.
    Waller, J.
    Young, C. J.
    Solomon, M. J.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2020, 24 (10) : 991 - 1000
  • [5] Spin in articles about minimally invasive transanal total mesorectal excision: an assessment of the current literature
    Patel, S. V.
    Zhang, L.
    Elsolh, B.
    Yu, D.
    Chadi, S. A.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 21 (01) : 8 - 14
  • [6] Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing robotic total mesorectal excision versus transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
    Chaouch, Mohamed Ali
    Hussain, Mohammad Iqbal
    Jellali, Maissa
    Gouader, Amine
    Mazzotta, Alessandro
    da Costa, Adriano Carneiro
    Krimi, Bassem
    Khan, Jim
    Oweira, Hani
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2025, 114 (01) : 73 - 83
  • [7] Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision versus transanal total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chi, Zhang Yi
    Gang, Ou
    Li, Feng Xiao
    Ya, Lu
    Zhijun, Zhou
    Gang, Du Yong
    Dan, Ran
    Xin, Liu
    Yang, Liu
    Peng, Zhang
    Yi, Luo
    Dong, Lin
    De Chun, Zhang
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (04) : E36859
  • [8] Clinical outcomes and case volume effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review
    Deijen, C. L.
    Tsai, A.
    Koedam, T. W. A.
    Helbach, M. Veltcamp
    Sietses, C.
    Lacy, A. M.
    Bonjer, H. J.
    Tuynman, J. B.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2016, 20 (12) : 811 - 824
  • [9] Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and perioperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision
    Ma, Bin
    Gao, Peng
    Song, Yongxi
    Zhang, Cong
    Zhang, Changwang
    Wang, Longyi
    Liu, Hongpeng
    Wang, Zhenning
    BMC CANCER, 2016, 16
  • [10] Transanal total mesorectal Excision A useful Complementary Method for minimally invasive Surgery of Rectal Cancer
    Rink, A. D.
    Aigner, F.
    Biebl, M.
    Fuerst, A.
    Kneist, W.
    CHIRURG, 2019, 90 (06): : 487 - 489