Socio-Ecological Analysis to Assess the Success of Artificial Reef Projects

被引:5
作者
Salaun, Jessica [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pioch, Sylvain [2 ]
Dauvin, Jean-Claude [3 ]
机构
[1] Atlantique Landes Recifs, F-40130 Capbreton, France
[2] Paul Valery Univ Montpellier 3, LAGAM, Lab Geog & Planning Management Montpellier, F-34000 Montpellier, France
[3] Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, M2C, Lab Morphodynam Continentale & Cotiere M2C,UMR 61, F-14000 Caen, France
关键词
Actor-network theory; environmental coastal management; French coast; ACTOR-NETWORK; STAKEHOLDER PERCEPTIONS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; MANAGEMENT; MARINE; PERSPECTIVE; GULF; NEED;
D O I
10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-21-00072.1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Artificial reefs (ARs) have been deployed for different purposes: to protect marine areas, to increase production in artisanal fisheries, to restore degraded ecological functionality, and to offset the negative impact of development projects. The assessment of ARs is currently based preferentially on physical, chemical, and biological data, whereas the links between these ecological initiatives and social data are rarely taken into account. In this study, ARs were investigated using the actor???network theory (ANT), a holistic approach developed in the social sciences that considers that nonhuman as well as human actors play a role in systems and networks. The findings show that the socioecological objectives of ARs are deeply dependent on the interests of the stakeholders active in each phase of the project: project identification, planning, implementation, monitoring, and management. Their position and interests strongly influence how the project is performed, and the objectives of the ARs also evolve in line with the type of stakeholders involved. Based on the interest of each stakeholder, this ANT analysis reveals that French ARs, called production ARs, also have ecological and social support objectives, including reducing conflict between fishermen or increasing natural marine resources diversity and biomass. The translation process steps provide a framework to understand the interest of each stakeholder involved in the AR network and how management actions are deployed to reach their key objectives. This approach could be used as a first step in the assessment process to define clear objectives. It would provide managers a more integrated approach to assess the success of current and future marine environmental management tools.
引用
收藏
页码:624 / 638
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Socio-ecological factors determine crop performance in agricultural systems
    Nkurunziza, Libere
    Watson, Christine A.
    Oborn, Ingrid
    Smith, Henrik G.
    Bergkvist, Goran
    Bengtsson, Jan
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [22] Organizing Within Dynamic Ecosystems: Conceptualizing Socio-Ecological Mechanisms
    Boons, Frank
    ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 26 (03) : 281 - 297
  • [23] An integral approach to address socio-ecological systems sustainability and their uncertainties
    Martinez-Fernandez, Julia
    Banos-Gonzalez, Isabel
    Esteve-Selma, Miguel Angel
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 762
  • [24] Economics, socio-ecological resilience and ecosystem services
    Farley, Joshua
    Voinov, Alexey
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 183 : 389 - 398
  • [25] Vulnerability of socio-ecological systems: A conceptual Framework
    Maria Berrouet, Lina
    Machado, Jenny
    Villegas-Palacio, Clara
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 84 : 632 - 647
  • [26] Socio-ecological dynamics of green roof ecosystems
    Aloisio, Jason M.
    Lewis, J. D.
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 11
  • [27] Quantifying resilience of socio-ecological systems through dynamic Bayesian networks
    Franco-Gaviria, Felipe
    Amador-Jimenez, Monica
    Millner, Naomi
    Durden, Charlotte
    Urrego, Dunia H.
    FRONTIERS IN FORESTS AND GLOBAL CHANGE, 2022, 5
  • [28] Science for Success-A Conflict of Interest? Researcher Position and Reflexivity in Socio-Ecological Research for CBNRM in Namibia
    Koot, Stasja
    Hebinck, Paul
    Sullivan, Sian
    SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2023, 36 (05) : 554 - 572
  • [29] Differing perceptions of socio-ecological systems: Insights for future transdisciplinary research
    Avriel-Avni, Noa
    Dick, Jan
    RESILIENCE IN COMPLEX SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS, 2019, 60 : 153 - 190
  • [30] Socio-ecological mapping generates public understanding of wilding conifer incursion
    Gawith, David
    Greenaway, Alison
    Samarasinghe, Oshadhi
    Bayne, Karen
    Velarde, Sandra
    Kravchenko, Alexey
    BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2020, 22 (10) : 3031 - 3049