Power, negotiations, and the anticipation of intergroup encounters

被引:48
作者
Saguy, Tamar [1 ]
Kteily, Nour [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch Management, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
Power; Intergroup encounters; Negotiations; Stability; Legitimacy; SOCIAL-DOMINANCE ORIENTATION; IN-GROUP BIAS; GROUP POSITION; CONTACT HYPOTHESIS; COLLECTIVE ACTION; PERCEIVED DISCRIMINATION; SYSTEM-JUSTIFICATION; INTERRACIAL CONTACT; DISADVANTAGED GROUP; IDENTITY MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/10463283.2014.957579
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This review places intergroup encounters in a broad framework which considers the context in which such encounters take place, and in particular, the power dynamics at play. We address different forms of encounters, spanning from interpersonal interactions (not focused on intergroup aspects) to political negotiations between the groups' representatives, and argue for a deeper consideration of power asymmetries in examining such encounters. We argue that because high- and low-power group members have different motivations for change in the status quo, they differ in their expectations from intergroup encounters and in the types of encounters they prefer. We describe relevant research while considering moderating factors such as the legitimacy and stability of the power dynamics. We also identify remaining gaps and topics requiring further research. This work has both conceptual and practical implications for the prospects of promoting both positive attitudinal change as well as changes to the hierarchical status quo.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 141
页数:35
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]   CONTACT HYPOTHESIS IN ETHNIC RELATIONS [J].
AMIR, Y .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1969, 71 (05) :319-&
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, RELATIVE DEPRIVATION
[3]  
[Anonymous], THE NATURE OF PREJUD
[4]   FAIR DRIVING - GENDER AND RACE DISCRIMINATION IN RETAIL CAR NEGOTIATIONS [J].
AYRES, I .
HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 1991, 104 (04) :817-872
[5]  
Bacharach S.B., 1981, Bargaining: Power, tactics, and outcomes
[6]   Friend or Ally: Whether Cross-Group Contact Undermines Collective Action Depends on What Advantaged Group Members Say (or Don't Say) [J].
Becker, Julia C. ;
Wright, Stephen C. ;
Lubensky, Micah E. ;
Zhou, Shelly .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2013, 39 (04) :442-455
[7]   Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Mullainathan, S .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2004, 94 (04) :991-1013
[8]   Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability [J].
Bettencourt, BA ;
Dorr, N ;
Charlton, K ;
Hume, DL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2001, 127 (04) :520-542
[9]   Equality For All? White Americans' Willingness to Address Inequality With Asian and African Americans [J].
Bikmen, Nida ;
Durkin, Kristine .
CULTURAL DIVERSITY & ETHNIC MINORITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 20 (04) :591-600
[10]   Difficult dialogs: Majority group members' willingness to talk about inequality with different minority groups [J].
Bikmen, Nida ;
Sunar, Diane .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERCULTURAL RELATIONS, 2013, 37 (04) :467-476