Randomized comparison of dry dressings versus hydrogel in management of radiation-induced moist desquamation

被引:50
作者
MacMillan, Maureen S.
Wells, Mary
MacBride, Sheila
Raab, Gillian M.
Munro, Alastair
MacDougall, Hugh
机构
[1] Napier Univ, Fac Life Sci, Edinburgh EH14 1DJ, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Dundee, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland
[3] Ninewells Hosp, Dept Surg & Mol Oncol, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland
[4] Univ Dundee, Sch Med, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland
[5] Univ St Andrews, Fac Med, St Andrews KY16 9AJ, Fife, Scotland
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2007年 / 68卷 / 03期
关键词
radiotherapy; skin care; acute toxicity; moist desquamation; wound healing;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.049
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We present the results of a randomized controlled clinical trial that evaluated the effect of a hydrogel or dry dressing on the time to healing of moist desquamation after radiotherapy to the head-and-neck, breast, or anorectal areas. Methods and Materials: A total of 357 patients were randomized before radiotherapy to receive simple dry dressings (Tricotex) or a hydrogel (Intrasite), with Tricotex as a secondary dressing. Patients were instructed to use their dressings from the onset of moist desquamation, if it occurred. Results: Of the 357 patients, 100 (28%) developed moist desquamation. The time to healing was significantly prolonged (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.99), in patients assigned to gel dressings. No evidence was found that gel dressings had a significant impact on subjectively reported skin symptoms. Conclusion: The results of this study have not supported the routine use of hydrogels in the care of patients with moist desquamation and suggests that the healing times are prolonged, without any improvement in patient comfort. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:864 / 872
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Towards genetic prediction of radiation responses:: ESTRO's GENEPI project [J].
Baumann, M ;
Hölscher, T ;
Begg, AC .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 69 (02) :121-125
[2]  
Chen YP, 1997, EUR J CANCER, V33, P1357
[3]  
Crane J, 1993, J TISSUE VIABILITY, V3, P98
[4]  
GLEAN E, 2001, RADIOTHER PRACT, V2, P75
[5]   Randomized, paired comparison of no-sting barrier film versus sorbolene cream (10% glycerine) skin care during postmastectomy irradiation [J].
Graham, P ;
Browne, L ;
Capp, A ;
Fox, C ;
Graham, J ;
Hollis, J ;
Nasser, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 58 (01) :241-246
[6]   Severe radiation dermatitis is related to Staphylococcus aureus [J].
Hill, A ;
Hanson, M ;
Bogle, MA ;
Duvic, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2004, 27 (04) :361-363
[7]  
Lavery B A, 1995, Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), V7, P184, DOI 10.1016/S0936-6555(05)80513-8
[8]   The effects of hydrocolloid dressing and gentian violet on radiation-induced moist desquamation wound healing [J].
Mak, SSS ;
Molassiotis, A ;
Wan, W ;
Lee, IYM ;
Chan, ESJ .
CANCER NURSING, 2000, 23 (03) :220-229
[9]  
MARGOLIN SG, 1990, CANCER NURS, V13, P71
[10]  
NHS Quality Improvement Scotland, BEST PRACT STAT SKIN