Interaction Between Everolimus and Tacrolimus in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Pharmacokinetic Controlled Trial

被引:38
|
作者
Pascual, Julio [1 ]
del Castillo, Domingo [2 ]
Cabello, Mercedes [3 ]
Pallardo, Luis [4 ]
Grinyo, Josep M. [5 ]
Fernandez, Ana M. [6 ]
Brunet, Merce [7 ]
机构
[1] Hosp del Mar, Serv Nefrol, Barcelona 08003, Spain
[2] Hosp Reina Sofia, Serv Nefrol, Madrid, Spain
[3] Hosp Carlos Haya, Serv Nefrol, Malaga, Spain
[4] Hosp Dr Peset, Serv Nefrol, Valencia, Spain
[5] Bellvitge Hosp, Serv Nefrol, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Hosp Ramon & Cajal, Serv Nefrol, E-28034 Madrid, Spain
[7] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Lab Farmacol, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Everolimus; Tacrolimus; Pharmacokinetics; Renal transplant; SIROLIMUS; COMBINATION; THERAPY; CLASSIFICATION; IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; CYCLOSPORINE; REJECTION; RAPAMYCIN; RAT;
D O I
10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ccd7f2
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Clinical data are lacking concerning therapeutic action and systemic exposure of tacrolimus (TAC) and everolimus (EVL) in a combined regimen in renal transplantation. Methods. A prospective randomized phase II pharmacokinetic study was conducted comparing two fixed EVL dosages (0.75 mg two times per day (BID), group A, or 1.5 mg BID, group B) in combination with standard TAC dose. Complete 12-hr pharmacokinetic curves of both drugs were performed at days 4, 14, and 42 posttransplant. Results. A higher TACC(min) was observed with EVL dose of 0.75 mg BID (TAC 11.1+/-6.4 group A vs. 9.4+/-5.0 ng/mL group B, P=0.03), with equivalent TAC area under the curves (162+/-61 vs. 171+/-75). The exposure to TAC was lower in group B despite higher TAC doses were required to maintain target concentrations (day 14: 9.5 vs. 12.5 mg and day 42: 6 vs. 9 mg, P<0.05). C(min)-TAC/dose and area under the curve-TAC/dose ratios were significantly lower, from day 4 to day 42, in group B. Both groups achieved good graft function and acute rejection rate was similar (20% and 15%, respectively). Conclusions. We conclude that in adult renal transplant recipients, EVL significantly decreases TAC oral bioavailability in a dose-dependent manner. Doses higher than 1.5 mg BID would be probably needed for TAC-minimization strategies because 3 mg/day is not enough to achieve levels more than 3 ng/mL during the first 2 weeks. Therapeutic drug monitoring is mandatory to adjust the dose and prevent low TAC exposure. This regimen of low EVL exposure plus standard TAC exposure avoids wound healing problems with good efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:994 / 1000
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dyslipidaemia among renal transplant recipients: cyclosporine versus tacrolimus
    Fazal, Muhammad Asim
    Idrees, Muhammad Khalid
    Akhtar, Syed Fazal
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 64 (05) : 496 - 499
  • [32] Steroid or tacrolimus withdrawal in renal transplant recipients using sirolimus
    Tainá Veras de Sandes Freitas
    Kelly Miyuki Harada
    Cláudia Rosso Felipe
    Nelson Zocoler Galante
    Edison Luiz Mandia Sampaio
    Edson Ikehara
    Fernando Alfieri
    Hélio Tedesco-Silva Júnior
    José Osmar Medina-Pestana
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2011, 43 : 1221 - 1228
  • [33] Pantoprazole Does not Affect Serum Trough Levels of Tacrolimus and Everolimus in Liver Transplant Recipients
    Bremer, Sebastian C. B.
    Reinhardt, Lars
    Sobotta, Michael
    Hasselluhn, Marie C.
    Lorf, Thomas
    Ellenrieder, Volker
    Schwoerer, Harald
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2018, 5
  • [34] Steroid or tacrolimus withdrawal in renal transplant recipients using sirolimus
    de Sandes Freitas, Taina Veras
    Harada, Kelly Miyuki
    Felipe, Claudia Rosso
    Galante, Nelson Zocoler
    Mandia Sampaio, Edison Luiz
    Ikehara, Edson
    Alfieri, Fernando
    Tedesco-Silva Junior, Helio
    Medina-Pestana, Jose Osmar
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2011, 43 (04) : 1221 - 1228
  • [35] Randomized Controlled Trial of Sirolimus Conversion in Cardiac Transplant Recipients With Renal Insufficiency
    Zuckermann, A.
    Keogh, Anne
    Crespo-Leiro, M. G.
    Mancini, D.
    Gonzalez Vilchez, F.
    Almenar, L.
    Brozena, S.
    Eisen, H.
    Tai, S. See
    Kushwaha, S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 12 (09) : 2487 - 2497
  • [36] AZA/Tacrolimus Is Associated with Similar Outcomes as MMF/Tacrolimus among Renal Transplant Recipients
    Schold, J. D.
    Kaplan, B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 9 (09) : 2067 - 2074
  • [37] A randomized, controlled trial of everolimus-based dual immunosuppression versus standard of care in de novo kidney transplant recipients
    Chadban, Steven J.
    Eris, Josette Marie
    Kanellis, John
    Pilmore, Helen
    Lee, Po Chang
    Lim, Soo Kun
    Woodcock, Chad
    Kurstjens, Nicol
    Russ, Graeme
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 27 (03) : 302 - 311
  • [38] Early Conversion to Prednisolone/Everolimus as an Alternative Weaning Regimen Associates With Beneficial Renal Transplant Histology and Function: The Randomized-Controlled MECANO Trial
    Bemelman, F. J.
    de Fijter, J. W.
    Kers, J.
    Meyer, C.
    Peters-Sengers, H.
    de Maar, E. F.
    van der Pant, K. A. M. I.
    de Vries, A. P. J.
    Sanders, J. -S.
    Zwinderman, A.
    Idu, M. M.
    Berger, S.
    Reinders, M. E. J.
    Krikke, C.
    Bajema, I. M.
    van Dijk, M. C.
    ten Berge, I. J. M.
    Ringers, J.
    Lardy, J.
    Roelen, D.
    Moes, D. -J.
    Florquin, S.
    van der Heide, J. J. Homan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 17 (04) : 1020 - 1030
  • [39] The evaluation of potential pharmacokinetic interaction between sirolimus and tacrolimus in healthy volunteers
    Tortorici, Michael A.
    Parks, Virginia
    Matschke, Kyle
    Korth-Bradley, Joan
    Patat, Alain
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 69 (04) : 835 - 842
  • [40] Pharmacogenetics Based Dose Prediction Model for Initial Tacrolimus Dosing in Renal Transplant Recipients
    Srinivas, Lekshmy
    Gracious, Noble
    Nair, Radhakrishnan R.
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 12