Interaction Between Everolimus and Tacrolimus in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Pharmacokinetic Controlled Trial

被引:38
|
作者
Pascual, Julio [1 ]
del Castillo, Domingo [2 ]
Cabello, Mercedes [3 ]
Pallardo, Luis [4 ]
Grinyo, Josep M. [5 ]
Fernandez, Ana M. [6 ]
Brunet, Merce [7 ]
机构
[1] Hosp del Mar, Serv Nefrol, Barcelona 08003, Spain
[2] Hosp Reina Sofia, Serv Nefrol, Madrid, Spain
[3] Hosp Carlos Haya, Serv Nefrol, Malaga, Spain
[4] Hosp Dr Peset, Serv Nefrol, Valencia, Spain
[5] Bellvitge Hosp, Serv Nefrol, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Hosp Ramon & Cajal, Serv Nefrol, E-28034 Madrid, Spain
[7] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Lab Farmacol, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Everolimus; Tacrolimus; Pharmacokinetics; Renal transplant; SIROLIMUS; COMBINATION; THERAPY; CLASSIFICATION; IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; CYCLOSPORINE; REJECTION; RAPAMYCIN; RAT;
D O I
10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ccd7f2
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Clinical data are lacking concerning therapeutic action and systemic exposure of tacrolimus (TAC) and everolimus (EVL) in a combined regimen in renal transplantation. Methods. A prospective randomized phase II pharmacokinetic study was conducted comparing two fixed EVL dosages (0.75 mg two times per day (BID), group A, or 1.5 mg BID, group B) in combination with standard TAC dose. Complete 12-hr pharmacokinetic curves of both drugs were performed at days 4, 14, and 42 posttransplant. Results. A higher TACC(min) was observed with EVL dose of 0.75 mg BID (TAC 11.1+/-6.4 group A vs. 9.4+/-5.0 ng/mL group B, P=0.03), with equivalent TAC area under the curves (162+/-61 vs. 171+/-75). The exposure to TAC was lower in group B despite higher TAC doses were required to maintain target concentrations (day 14: 9.5 vs. 12.5 mg and day 42: 6 vs. 9 mg, P<0.05). C(min)-TAC/dose and area under the curve-TAC/dose ratios were significantly lower, from day 4 to day 42, in group B. Both groups achieved good graft function and acute rejection rate was similar (20% and 15%, respectively). Conclusions. We conclude that in adult renal transplant recipients, EVL significantly decreases TAC oral bioavailability in a dose-dependent manner. Doses higher than 1.5 mg BID would be probably needed for TAC-minimization strategies because 3 mg/day is not enough to achieve levels more than 3 ng/mL during the first 2 weeks. Therapeutic drug monitoring is mandatory to adjust the dose and prevent low TAC exposure. This regimen of low EVL exposure plus standard TAC exposure avoids wound healing problems with good efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:994 / 1000
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Alemtuzumab induction with tacrolimus monotherapy in 25 pediatric renal transplant recipients
    Sung, Jennifer
    Barry, John M.
    Jenkins, Randy
    Rozansky, David
    Iragorri, Sandra
    Conlin, Michael
    Al-Uzri, Amira
    PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 17 (08) : 718 - 725
  • [22] Pharmacokinetics and Long-TermSafety and Tolerability of Everolimus in Renal Transplant Recipients Converted From Cyclosporine
    Felipe, Claudia R.
    Oliveira, Nagilla I.
    Hannun, Pedro G.
    de Paula, Mayara Ivani
    Tedesco-Silva, Helio
    Medina-Pestana, Jose O.
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2016, 38 (01) : 64 - 72
  • [23] Pharmacokinetic interactions between tacrolimus and Wuzhi capsule in liver transplant recipients: Genetic polymorphisms affect the drug interaction
    Huang, Siqi
    Song, Wei
    Jiang, Shuangmiao
    Li, Yuanchen
    Wang, Min
    Yang, Na
    Zhu, Huaijun
    CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS, 2024, 391
  • [24] Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Tacrolimus and DiltiazemDose-Response Relationship in Kidney and Liver Transplant Recipients
    Terry E. Jones
    Raymond G. Morris
    Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 2002, 41 : 381 - 388
  • [25] External evaluation of published population pharmacokinetic models of tacrolimus in adult renal transplant recipients
    Zhao, Chen-Yan
    Jiao, Zheng
    Mao, Jun-Jun
    Qiu, Xiao-Yan
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 81 (05) : 891 - 907
  • [26] Pharmacokinetic interaction between corticosteroids and tacrolimus after renal transplantation
    Anglicheau, D
    Flamant, M
    Schlageter, MH
    Martinez, F
    Cassinat, B
    Beaune, P
    Legendre, C
    Thervet, E
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 18 (11) : 2409 - 2414
  • [27] Multicenter trial of everolimus in pediatric renal transplant recipients: Results at three year
    Ettenger, Robert
    Hoyer, Peter-Friedrich
    Grimm, Paul
    Webb, Nicholas
    Loirat, Chantal
    Mahan, John D.
    Mentser, Mark
    Niaudet, Patrick
    Offner, Gisela
    Vandamme-Lombaerts, R.
    Hexham, J. Mark
    PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 12 (04) : 456 - 463
  • [28] A randomized, prospective, pharmacoeconomic trial of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in combination with thymoglobulin in renal transplant recipients
    Hardinger, KL
    Bohl, DL
    Schnitzler, MA
    Lockwood, M
    Storch, GA
    Brennan, DC
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 80 (01) : 41 - 46
  • [29] Suspicion of interaction between maribavir and everolimus in a renal transplant recipient
    Verdier, M. C.
    Patrat-Delon, S.
    Lemaitre, F.
    Revest, M.
    Michelet, C.
    Bellissant, E.
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 28 : 40 - 40
  • [30] Worsening pneumonitis due to a pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between everolimus and voriconazole in a renal transplant patient
    Lecefel, C.
    Eloy, P.
    Chauvin, B.
    Wyplosz, B.
    Amilien, V.
    Massias, L.
    Taburet, A. -M.
    Francois, H.
    Furlan, V.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 40 (01) : 119 - 120