Interaction Between Everolimus and Tacrolimus in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Pharmacokinetic Controlled Trial

被引:38
|
作者
Pascual, Julio [1 ]
del Castillo, Domingo [2 ]
Cabello, Mercedes [3 ]
Pallardo, Luis [4 ]
Grinyo, Josep M. [5 ]
Fernandez, Ana M. [6 ]
Brunet, Merce [7 ]
机构
[1] Hosp del Mar, Serv Nefrol, Barcelona 08003, Spain
[2] Hosp Reina Sofia, Serv Nefrol, Madrid, Spain
[3] Hosp Carlos Haya, Serv Nefrol, Malaga, Spain
[4] Hosp Dr Peset, Serv Nefrol, Valencia, Spain
[5] Bellvitge Hosp, Serv Nefrol, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Hosp Ramon & Cajal, Serv Nefrol, E-28034 Madrid, Spain
[7] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Lab Farmacol, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Everolimus; Tacrolimus; Pharmacokinetics; Renal transplant; SIROLIMUS; COMBINATION; THERAPY; CLASSIFICATION; IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; CYCLOSPORINE; REJECTION; RAPAMYCIN; RAT;
D O I
10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ccd7f2
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Clinical data are lacking concerning therapeutic action and systemic exposure of tacrolimus (TAC) and everolimus (EVL) in a combined regimen in renal transplantation. Methods. A prospective randomized phase II pharmacokinetic study was conducted comparing two fixed EVL dosages (0.75 mg two times per day (BID), group A, or 1.5 mg BID, group B) in combination with standard TAC dose. Complete 12-hr pharmacokinetic curves of both drugs were performed at days 4, 14, and 42 posttransplant. Results. A higher TACC(min) was observed with EVL dose of 0.75 mg BID (TAC 11.1+/-6.4 group A vs. 9.4+/-5.0 ng/mL group B, P=0.03), with equivalent TAC area under the curves (162+/-61 vs. 171+/-75). The exposure to TAC was lower in group B despite higher TAC doses were required to maintain target concentrations (day 14: 9.5 vs. 12.5 mg and day 42: 6 vs. 9 mg, P<0.05). C(min)-TAC/dose and area under the curve-TAC/dose ratios were significantly lower, from day 4 to day 42, in group B. Both groups achieved good graft function and acute rejection rate was similar (20% and 15%, respectively). Conclusions. We conclude that in adult renal transplant recipients, EVL significantly decreases TAC oral bioavailability in a dose-dependent manner. Doses higher than 1.5 mg BID would be probably needed for TAC-minimization strategies because 3 mg/day is not enough to achieve levels more than 3 ng/mL during the first 2 weeks. Therapeutic drug monitoring is mandatory to adjust the dose and prevent low TAC exposure. This regimen of low EVL exposure plus standard TAC exposure avoids wound healing problems with good efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:994 / 1000
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Everolimus With Reduced Tacrolimus Improves Renal Function in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    De Simone, P.
    Nevens, F.
    De Carlis, L.
    Metselaar, H. J.
    Beckebaum, S.
    Saliba, F.
    Jonas, S.
    Sudan, D.
    Fung, J.
    Fischer, L.
    Duvoux, C.
    Chavin, K. D.
    Koneru, B.
    Huang, M. A.
    Chapman, W. C.
    Foltys, D.
    Witte, S.
    Jiang, H.
    Hexham, J. M.
    Junge, G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 12 (11) : 3008 - 3020
  • [2] Prediction of tacrolimus and Wuzhi tablet pharmacokinetic interaction magnitude in renal transplant recipients
    Chen, Pan
    Dai, Rui
    She, Youjun
    Fu, Qian
    Huang, Min
    Chen, Xiao
    Wang, Changxi
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 36 (12)
  • [3] No pharmacokinetic interactions between mycophenolic acid and tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients
    Kagaya, H.
    Miura, M.
    Satoh, S.
    Inoue, K.
    Saito, M.
    Inoue, T.
    Habuchi, T.
    Suzuki, T.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 33 (02) : 193 - 201
  • [4] Randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of everolimus and low-exposure tacrolimus on graft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients
    Taber, David J.
    Chokkalingam, Avudaiappan
    Su, Zemin
    Self, Sally
    Miller, Dylan
    Srinivas, Titte
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 33 (10)
  • [5] Clinical interaction between omeprazole and tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients
    Ferchichi, K.
    Ben Hammamia, S.
    Ben Sassi, M.
    El Jebari, H.
    Charfi, R.
    Daghfous, R.
    Gaies, E.
    Trabelsi, S.
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 37 : 206 - 207
  • [6] Absence of interaction between rivaroxaban, tacrolimus and everolimus in renal transplant recipients with deep vein thrombosis or atrial fibrillation
    Camporese, G.
    Bernardi, D.
    Bernardi, E.
    Avruscio, G. P.
    Marchini, F.
    Bonfante, L.
    Furian, L.
    Neri, F.
    Villalta, S.
    Fabris, F.
    Simioni, P.
    Sartori, M. T.
    VASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 130
  • [7] Population dynamics analysis of the interaction between tacrolimus and voriconazole in renal transplant recipients
    Sun, Zhi-Hua
    Zhao, Yi-Chang
    Li, Jia-Kai
    Peng, Fenghua
    Yu, Feng
    Zhang, Bi-Kui
    Yan, Miao
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2025, 15
  • [8] Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in stable paediatric renal transplant recipients
    Claeys, Tania
    Van Dyck, Maria
    Van Damme-Lombaerts, Rita
    PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2010, 25 (02) : 335 - 342
  • [9] How to handle missed or delayed doses of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients? A pharmacokinetic investigation
    Saint-Marcoux, Franck
    Woillard, Jean-Baptiste
    Monchaud, Caroline
    Friedl, Jennifer
    Bocquentin, Frederique
    Essig, Marie
    Marquet, Pierre
    PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 100 : 281 - 287
  • [10] Periodontal inflammation in renal transplant recipients receiving Everolimus or Tacrolimus - preliminary results
    Pereira-Lopes, O.
    Sampaio-Maia, B.
    Sampaio, S.
    Vieira-Marques, P.
    Monteiro-da-Silva, F.
    Braga, A. C.
    Felino, A.
    Pestana, M.
    ORAL DISEASES, 2013, 19 (07) : 666 - 672