Ambivalent Sexism in Close Relationships: (Hostile) Power and (Benevolent) Romance Shape Relationship Ideals

被引：118

作者：

Lee, Tiane L. ^{[1
]}

Fiske, Susan T. ^{[1
]}

Glick, Peter ^{[2
]}

Chen, Zhixia ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Psychol, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA

[2] Lawrence Univ, Appleton, WI 54912 USA

[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China

来源：

SEX ROLES | 2010年 / 62卷 / 7-8期

关键词：

Ambivalent sexism; Close relationships; Gender roles; Culture; Power; Romance; PRESCRIPTIVE GENDER STEREOTYPES; DIFFERENTIATING HOSTILE; MATE PREFERENCES; LOVE; ATTITUDES; WOMEN; MARRIAGE; MEN; CONSEQUENCES; PERSPECTIVES;

D O I：

10.1007/s11199-010-9770-x

中图分类号：

B844 [发展心理学（人类心理学）];

学科分类号：

040202 ;

摘要：

Gender-based structural power and heterosexual dependency produce ambivalent gender ideologies, with hostility and benevolence separately shaping close-relationship ideals. The relative importance of romanticized benevolent versus more overtly power-based hostile sexism, however, may be culturally dependent. Testing this, northeast US (N = 311) and central Chinese (N = 290) undergraduates rated prescriptions and proscriptions (ideals) for partners and completed Ambivalent Sexism and Ambivalence toward Men Inventories (ideologies). Multiple regressions analyses conducted on group-specific relationship ideals revealed that benevolent ideologies predicted partner ideals, in both countries, especially for US culture's romance-oriented relationships. Hostile attitudes predicted men's ideals, both American and Chinese, suggesting both societies' dominant-partner advantage.

引用

页码：583 / 601

页数：19

共 48 条

[1] Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity [J].

Abrams, D ;

Viki, GT ;

Masser, B ;

Bohner, G .

JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 84 (01) :111-125

[2]

[Anonymous], HUM DEV REP 2005

[3] The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities [J].

Barreto, M ;

Ellemers, N .

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 35 (05) :633-642

[4]

Begany J.J., 2002, PSYCHOL MEN MASCULIN, V3, P119, DOI DOI 10.1037/1524-9220.3.2.119

[5] A social categorical approach to a question about love [J].

Berscheid, E ;

Meyers, SA .

PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 1996, 3 (01) :19-43

[6]

Brehm S.S., 1992, INTIMATE RELATIONSHI

[7] Who women are, who women should be - Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination [J].

Burgess, D ;

Borgida, E .

PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 1999, 5 (03) :665-692

[8] Attractive Women Want it All: Good Genes, Economic Investment, Parenting Proclivities, and Emotional Commitment [J].

Buss, David M. ;

Shackelford, Todd K. .

EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 6 (01) :134-146

[9] Ambivalent Sexism and Power-Related Gender-role Ideology in Marriage [J].

Chen, Zhixia ;

Fiske, Susan T. ;

Lee, Tiane L. .

SEX ROLES, 2009, 60 (11-12) :765-778

[10] Conservative ideology and ambivalent sexism [J].

Christopher, AN ;

Mull, MS .

PSYCHOLOGY OF WOMEN QUARTERLY, 2006, 30 (02) :223-230

← 1 2 3 4 5 →