Calibration and Evaluation of the FAO AquaCrop Model for Canola (Brassica napus) under Varied Moistube Irrigation Regimes

被引:19
作者
Dirwai, Tinashe Lindel [1 ,2 ]
Senzanje, Aidan [1 ]
Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Engn, P Bag X01, ZA-3209 Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
[2] VarMac Consulting Engineers, ZA-3209 Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
[3] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Ctr Transformat Agr & Food Syst, Sch Agr Earth & Environm Sci, P Bag X01, ZA-3209 Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 05期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
biomass; crop modelling; water productivity; water regimes; yield; SIMULATE YIELD RESPONSE; SOIL-WATER CONTENT; DEFICIT IRRIGATION; SPRING CANOLA; CROP MODEL; WINTER-WHEAT; PRODUCTIVITY; GROWTH; PARAMETERIZATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture11050410
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The AquaCrop model was calibrated and validated for canola (Brassica napus) under Moistube irrigation (MTI) and various water regimes [(i) 100%, (ii) 75%, and (iii) 55% of crop water requirement (ETc)] over two seasons, 2019 and 2020. The normalised root mean square (nRMSE), Model Efficiency (EF), R-2, and theWillmot's index of agreement (d) statistics were used to evaluate the model's efficiency in simulating biomass (B), canopy cover (CC), yield (Y), and harvest index (HI). The calibration results indicated the model simulated with accuracy the CC (under 100% ETc R-2 = 0.99, EF = 0.92, nRMSE = 6.4%, d = 0.98) and 75% ETc (R-2 = 0.99, EF = 0.92, nRMSE = 10.3%, d = 0.98). The model simulated CC well for validation for 100% ETc (R-2 = 0.97, EF = 0.93, nRMSE = 22.5%, d = 0.98) and 75% ETc (R-2 = 0.84, EF = 0.45, nRMSE = 59.2%, d = 0.86) irrigation regimes. Final biomass simulations were reasonably good under 100% ETc, 75% ETc, and 55% ETc irrigation regimes (R-2 > 0.90, d > 0.65). The study showed the usefulness of AquaCrop for assessing yield response of canola to full and deficit irrigation scenarios under MTI.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Performance evaluation of AquaCrop model for maize crop in a semi-arid environment [J].
Abedinpour, M. ;
Sarangi, A. ;
Rajput, T. B. S. ;
Singh, Man ;
Pathak, H. ;
Ahmad, T. .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2012, 110 :55-66
[2]   Modeling Maize Yield and Soil Water Content with AquaCrop Under Full and Deficit Irrigation Managements [J].
Ahmadi, Seyed Hamid ;
Mosallaeepour, Elnaz ;
Kamgar-Haghighi, Ali Akbar ;
Sepaskhah, Ali Reza .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2015, 29 (08) :2837-2853
[3]  
Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
[4]   Validation and testing of the AquaCrop model under full and deficit irrigated wheat production in Iran [J].
Andarzian, B. ;
Bannayan, M. ;
Steduto, P. ;
Mazraeh, H. ;
Barati, M. E. ;
Barati, M. A. ;
Rahnama, A. .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2011, 100 (01) :1-8
[5]   Test of AquaCrop model in simulating biomass and yield of water deficient and irrigated barley (Hordeum vulgare) [J].
Araya, A. ;
Habtu, Solomon ;
Hadgu, Kiros Meles ;
Kebede, Afewerk ;
Dejene, Taddese .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2010, 97 (11) :1838-1846
[6]   Simulating yield response to water of Teff (Eragrostis tef) with FAO's AquaCrop model [J].
Araya, A. ;
Keesstra, S. D. ;
Stroosnijder, L. .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2010, 116 (1-2) :196-204
[7]   Vegetative production of kenaf and canola under irrigation in central California [J].
Bañuelos, GS ;
Bryla, DR ;
Cook, CG .
INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2002, 15 (03) :237-245
[8]   Simulating the yields of bioenergy and food crops with the crop modeling software BioSTAR: The carbon-based growth engine and the BioSTAR ET0 method [J].
Bauböck R. .
Environmental Sciences Europe, 2014, 26 (1)
[9]   Rates of progress towards flowering and podding in bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea) as a function of temperature and photoperiod [J].
Brink, M .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1997, 80 (04) :505-513
[10]   Calibration and evaluation of aquacrop for groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) under water deficit conditions [J].
Chibarabada, T. P. ;
Modi, A. T. ;
Mabhaudhi, T. .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2020, 281