Reduction of inappropriate medication in older populations by electronic decision support (the PRIMA-eDS project): a survey of general practitioners' experiences

被引:16
作者
Rieckert, Anja [1 ]
Teichmann, Anne-Lisa [1 ]
Drewelow, Eva [2 ]
Kriechmayr, Celine [3 ]
Piccoliori, Giuliano [4 ]
Woodham, Adrine [5 ]
Soennichsen, Andreas [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Witten Herdecke Univ, Fac Hlth, Inst Gen Practice & Family Med, Dept Human Med, Alfred Herrhausen Str 50, D-58448 Witten, Germany
[2] Rostock Univ, Inst Gen Practice, Med Ctr, Rostock, Germany
[3] Paracelsus Med Univ, Inst Gen Practice Family Med & Prevent Med, Salzburg, Austria
[4] South Tyrolean Acad Gen Practice, Bolzano, Italy
[5] Univ Manchester, Sch Hlth Sci, Div Populat Hlth Hlth Serv Res & Primary Care, Manchester, Lancs, England
[6] Med Univ Vienna, Ctr Publ Hlth, Dept Gen Practice & Family Med, Vienna, Austria
关键词
aged; general practitioners; evidence-based medicine; deprescribing; multimorbidity; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; CARE; POLYPHARMACY; VIEWS;
D O I
10.1093/jamia/ocz104
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objective: We sought to investigate the experiences of general practitioners (GPs) with an electronic decision support tool to reduce inappropriate polypharmacy in older patients (the PRIMA-eDS [Polypharmacy in chronic diseases: Reduction of Inappropriate Medication and Adverse drug events in older populations by electronic Decision Support] tool) in a multinational sample of GPs and to quantify the findings from a prior qualitative study on the PRIMA-eDS-tool. Materials and Methods: Alongside the cluster randomized controlled PRIMA-eDS trial, a survey was conducted in all 5 participating study centers (Bolzano, Italy; Manchester, United Kingdom; Salzburg, Austria; Rostock, Germany; and Witten, Germany) between October 2016 and July 2017. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests. Results: Ninety-one (n=160) percent of the 176 questionnaires were returned. Thirty-two percent of the respondents reported that they did not cease drugs because of the medication check. The 68% who had discontinued drugs comprise 57% who had stopped on average 1 drug and 11% who had stopped 2 drugs or more per patient. The PRIMA-eDS tool was found to be useful (69%) and the recommendations were found to help to increase awareness (86%). The greatest barrier to implementing deprescribing recommendations was the perceived necessity of the medication (69%). The majority of respondents (65%) would use the electronic medication check in routine practice if it was part of the electronic health record. Conclusions: GPs generally viewed the PRIMA-eDS medication check as useful and as informative. Recommendations were not always followed due to various reasons. Many GPs would use the medication check if integrated into the electronic health record.
引用
收藏
页码:1323 / 1332
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [11] Medication review and reconciliation with cooperation between pharmacist and general practitioner and the benefit for the patient: a systematic review
    Geurts, Marlies M. E.
    Talsma, Jaap
    Brouwers, Jacobus R. B. J.
    de Gier, Johan J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 74 (01) : 16 - 33
  • [12] The rising tide of polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions: population database analysis 1995-2010
    Guthrie, Bruce
    Makubate, Boikanyo
    Hernandez-Santiago, Virginia
    Dreischulte, Tobias
    [J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2015, 13
  • [13] Potential drug-related problems detected by electronic expert support system: physicians' views on clinical relevance
    Hammar, Tora
    Lidstrom, Bodil
    Petersson, Goran
    Gustafson, Yngve
    Eiermann, Birgit
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2015, 37 (05) : 941 - 948
  • [14] Alternatives to potentially inappropriate medications for use in e-prescribing software: triggers and treatment algorithms
    Hume, Anne L.
    Quilliam, Brian J.
    Goldman, Roberta
    Eaton, Charles
    Lapane, Kate L.
    [J]. BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2011, 20 (10) : 875 - 884
  • [15] International variations in primary care physician consultation time: a systematic review of 67 countries
    Irving, Greg
    Neves, Ana Luisa
    Dambha-Miller, Hajira
    Oishi, Ai
    Tagashira, Hiroko
    Verho, Anastasiya
    Holden, John
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (10):
  • [16] Clinical decision support must be useful, functional is not enough: a qualitative study of computer-based clinical decision support in primary care
    Kortteisto, Tiina
    Komulainen, Jorma
    Makela, Marjukka
    Kunnamo, Ilkka
    Kaila, Minna
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2012, 12
  • [17] Implementation of multiple-domain covering computerized decision support systems in primary care: a focus group study on perceived barriers
    Lugtenberg, Marjolein
    Weenink, Jan-Willem
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    Westert, Gert P.
    Kool, Rudolf B.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2015, 15
  • [18] A set of systematic reviews to help reduce inappropriate prescribing to older people: study protocol
    Martinez, Yolanda V.
    Renom-Guiteras, Anna
    Reeves, David
    Erandie Ediriweera de Silva, R.
    Esmail, Aneez
    Kunnamo, Ilkka
    Rieckert, Anja
    Sommerauer, Christina
    Soennichsen, Andreas
    [J]. BMC GERIATRICS, 2017, 17
  • [19] Medbase, RENB AN ADV DRUG REA
  • [20] Medbase, RISKBASE AN ADV DRUG