Survival of medial unicondylar arthroplasties placed by one surgeon 1984-1998

被引:19
作者
Eickmann, Thomas H.
Collier, Matthew B.
Sukezaki, Fumio
McAuley, James P.
Engh, Gerard A.
机构
[1] Anderson Orthopaed Res Inst, Alexandria, VA 22307 USA
[2] Showa Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Tokyo 142, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.blo.0000238793.74843.dc
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Unicondylar arthroplasty survival rates have varied widely. Implant- and patient-specific factors may be contributory. One surgeon placed 411 medial compartment arthroplasties of 12 designs from 1984 to 1998. In most cases, the fixed bearing tibial component was placed with cement and featured gamma-sterilized-in-air polyethylene and a metal backing. Tibial component initial thickness averaged 8.5 +/- 1.4 mm. Polyethylene shelf age averaged 1.3 +/- 1.2 years. Age and weight at arthroplasty averaged 67 +/- 8 years and 83 +/- 15 kg, respectively. Survival (no revision) at 9 years was 80%. Revision was more common in younger patients, in those with a thinner tibial component or longer polyethylene shelf age, and when some designs were used rather than others; weight and gender were not associated with revision. Nine-year survival improved to 94% when tibial component thickness was >7 mm and polyethylene shelf age was < 1 year (154 knees). Per our experience, placement of a thin or shelf-aged gamma-irradiated-in-air polyethylene bearing into a young or active subject could explain most failures of unicondylar arthroplasties done in the 1980s and 1990s. Unicondylar patients of that era who were fortunate enough to avoid a thin or aged oxidation-prone polyethylene bearing probably have enjoyed superior outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 149
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   A comparative-study of the medial St Georg Sled and kinematic total knee arthroplasties - Ten-year survivorship [J].
Ackroyd, CE ;
Whitehouse, SL ;
Newman, JH ;
Joslin, CC .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2002, 84B (05) :667-672
[2]   Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement - A three to ten-year follow-up study [J].
Argenson, JNA ;
Chevrol-Benkeddache, Y ;
Aubaniac, JM .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (12) :2235-2239
[3]  
BARRETT WP, 1987, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V69A, P1328
[4]  
BARTLEY RE, 1994, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V299, P18
[5]   Porous-coated anatomic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis - A 3- to 9-year follow-up study [J].
Bergenudd, H .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1995, 10 :S8-S13
[6]   Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up [J].
Berger, RA ;
Meneghini, RM ;
Jacobs, JJ ;
Sheinkop, MB ;
Della Valle, CJ ;
Rosenberg, AG ;
Galante, JO .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (05) :999-1006
[7]  
Capra S W Jr, 1992, J Arthroplasty, V7, P247, DOI 10.1016/0883-5403(92)90044-Q
[8]   Shelf age of the polyethylene tibial component and outcome of unicondylar knee arthroplasty [J].
Collier, MB ;
Engh, CA ;
Engh, GA .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (04) :763-769
[9]  
Currier BH, 2000, J BIOMED MATER RES, V53, P143, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(2000)53:2<143::AID-JBM3>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-5