Histological Grade and Immunohistochemical Biomarkers of Breast Cancer: Correlation to Ultrasound Features

被引:24
作者
Au, Frederick Wing-Fai [1 ]
Ghai, Sandeep [2 ]
Lu, Fang-I [3 ]
Moshonov, Hadas [4 ]
Crystal, Pavel [5 ]
机构
[1] Toronto Gen Hosp, Joint Dept Med Imaging, 585 Univ Ave E, Toronto, ON M5G 2N2, Canada
[2] Womens Coll Hosp, Joint Dept Med Imaging, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Pathol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Imaging, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Mt Sinai Hosp, Joint Dept Med Imaging, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
breast; breast cancer; ultrasound; INVASIVE DUCTAL CARCINOMA; OBSERVER VARIABILITY; BI-RADS; RECEPTOR; SONOGRAPHY; SUBTYPES; STATISTICS; SURVIVAL; COHORT;
D O I
10.1002/jum.14247
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThe purpose of this study is to correlate various features of breast cancers on ultrasound to their histological grade and immunohistochemical biomarkers. MethodsSeventy-three patients with 77 invasive breast cancers, diagnosed between August 2011 and December 2014, were included in this prospective analysis. Margin, posterior features, shape, and vascularity were determined from ultrasound and classified according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon. Histological grade, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status (positive [+] or negative [-]) were determined from surgical pathology reports. The cancers were categorized into low grade (grades 1 or 2) and high grade (grade 3). Correlation of ultrasound features of the cancers to their histological grade and receptor status was performed. ResultsThere were 47 low-grade and 29 high-grade cancers. There was a significant difference in margin and posterior features between the low and high grade, ER+and ER-, and PR+and PR- (all P<.05), but not between HER2+and HER2- cancers (both P>.05). There was no significant difference in shape and vascularity among the different subtypes (all P>.05). Spiculated margin was significantly associated with low-grade, ER+, PR+status; angular margin with high grade; microlobulated margin with ER- status; shadowing with PR+status; and enhancement with high grade, ER- status (all P<.05, all odds ratios3.94). ConclusionsThere was significant association of margin and posterior features of breast cancers with their histological grade and receptor status.
引用
收藏
页码:1883 / 1894
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Correlation of sonographic features of invasive ductal mammary carcinoma with age, tumor grade, and hormone-receptor status [J].
Aho, Michael ;
Irshad, Abid ;
Ackerman, Susan J. ;
Lewis, Madelene ;
Leddy, Rebecca ;
Pope, Thomas L. ;
Campbell, Amy S. ;
Cluver, Abbie ;
Wolf, Bethany J. ;
Cunningham, Joan E. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2013, 41 (01) :10-17
[2]   Sonography of solid breast lesions: Observer variability of lesion description and assessment [J].
Baker, JA ;
Kornguth, PJ ;
Soo, MS ;
Walsh, R ;
Mengoni, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (06) :1621-1625
[3]   Sonographic Appearance of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast According to Histologic Grade [J].
Blaichman, Jason ;
Marcus, James C. ;
Alsaadi, Tahra ;
El-Khoury, Mona ;
Meterissian, Sarkis ;
Mesurolle, Benoit .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 199 (03) :W402-W408
[4]   HISTOLOGICAL GRADING AND PROGNOSIS IN BREAST CANCER - A STUDY OF 1409 CASES OF WHICH 359 HAVE BEEN FOLLOWED FOR 15 YEARS [J].
BLOOM, HJG ;
RICHARDSON, WW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1957, 11 (03) :359-&
[5]   Subtyping of Breast Cancer by Immunohistochemistry to Investigate a Relationship between Subtype and Short and Long Term Survival: A Collaborative Analysis of Data for 10,159 Cases from 12 Studies [J].
Blows, Fiona M. ;
Driver, Kristy E. ;
Schmidt, Marjanka K. ;
Broeks, Annegien ;
van Leeuwen, Flora E. ;
Wesseling, Jelle ;
Cheang, Maggie C. ;
Gelmon, Karen ;
Nielsen, Torsten O. ;
Blomqvist, Carl ;
Heikkila, Paivi ;
Heikkinen, Tuomas ;
Nevanlinna, Heli ;
Akslen, Lars A. ;
Begin, Louis R. ;
Foulkes, William D. ;
Couch, Fergus J. ;
Wang, Xianshu ;
Cafourek, Vicky ;
Olson, Janet E. ;
Baglietto, Laura ;
Giles, Graham G. ;
Severi, Gianluca ;
McLean, Catriona A. ;
Southey, Melissa C. ;
Rakha, Emad ;
Green, Andrew R. ;
Ellis, Ian O. ;
Sherman, Mark E. ;
Lissowska, Jolanta ;
Anderson, William F. ;
Cox, Angela ;
Cross, Simon S. ;
Reed, Malcolm W. R. ;
Provenzano, Elena ;
Dawson, Sarah-Jane ;
Dunning, Alison M. ;
Humphreys, Manjeet ;
Easton, Douglas F. ;
Garcia-Closas, Montserrat ;
Caldas, Carlos ;
Pharoah, Paul D. ;
Huntsman, David .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2010, 7 (05)
[6]  
CARTER CL, 1989, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V63, P181, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19890101)63:1<181::AID-CNCR2820630129>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-H
[8]   The role of ultrasonographic findings to predict molecular subtype, histologic grade, and hormone receptor status of breast cancer [J].
Celebi, Filiz ;
Pilanci, Kezban Nur ;
Ordu, Cetin ;
Agacayak, Filiz ;
Alco, Gul ;
Ilgun, Serkan ;
Sarsenov, Dauren ;
Erdogan, Zeynep ;
Ozmen, Vahit .
DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 21 (06) :448-453
[9]   Prognostic Value of a Combined Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, Ki-67, and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemical Score and Comparison With the Genomic Health Recurrence Score in Early Breast Cancer [J].
Cuzick, Jack ;
Dowsett, Mitch ;
Pineda, Silvia ;
Wale, Christopher ;
Salter, Janine ;
Quinn, Emma ;
Zabaglo, Lila ;
Mallon, Elizabeth ;
Green, Andrew R. ;
Ellis, Ian O. ;
Howell, Anthony ;
Buzdar, Aman U. ;
Forbes, John F. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (32) :4273-4278
[10]   Defining breast cancer prognosis based on molecular phenotypes: results from a large cohort study [J].
Dawood, Shaheenah ;
Hu, Rong ;
Homes, Michelle D. ;
Collins, Laura C. ;
Schnitt, Stuart J. ;
Connolly, James ;
Colditz, Graham A. ;
Tamimi, Rulla M. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2011, 126 (01) :185-192