Implementing Intelligence-Led Policing: An Application of Loose-Coupling Theory

被引:26
作者
Carter, Jeremy G. [1 ]
Phillips, Scott W. [2 ]
Gayadeen, S. Marlon [2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ, Sch Publ & Environm Affairs, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] SUNY Coll Buffalo, Dept Criminal Justice, Buffalo, NY 14222 USA
关键词
STATE; ORGANIZATIONS; INNOVATION; AGENCIES; RATES; MYTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.08.002
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Purpose: This research is intended to inform a knowledge gap in the literature and present the first national findings related to intelligence-led policing adoption among state and local agencies. Specific practices are identified to inform scholars and practitioners regarding intelligence-led policing behaviors. Methods: Original survey research from a federally-funded project is gleaned to explore intelligence-led policing adoption through a loose-coupling theoretical perspective. Negative binomial and logistic regression models are employed to identify predictive relationships. Results: Agencies nationwide appear to be closely following the National Criminal Intelligence Sharing Plan recommendations to enhance information sharing. Consistent with the Department of Homeland Security's Target Capabilities List is also observed. Agency size appears to have a significant effect on key organizational information sharing behaviors. The findings are tempered due to limitations in the research design. Conclusions: Local agencies appear to be tightly-coupled with the recommendations put forth in the National Criminal Intelligence Sharing Plan in their efforts to adopt intelligence-led policing. Agency size appears to enhance adoption across most dependent metrics. This research progresses the limited evidence base and progress regarding this emerging policing philosophy. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 442
页数:10
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1969, SOCIAL PSYCHOL ORG
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, SOCIOLOGY LAW VISION, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511815546
[3]   Patrol officers' perceived role in responding to cybercrime [J].
Bossler, Adam M. ;
Holt, Thomas J. .
POLICING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICE STRATEGIES & MANAGEMENT, 2012, 35 (01) :165-181
[4]   Explaining Rising Nonresponse Rates in Cross-Sectional Surveys [J].
Brick, J. Michael ;
Williams, Douglas .
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2013, 645 (01) :36-59
[5]  
Brown M.K., 1981, Working the streets: Police discretion and the dilemmas of reform
[6]  
Bureau of Justice Assistance, 2010, RED CRIM INT LED POL
[7]  
Carter D., 2009, Criminal Justice Policy Review, V2009, P310, DOI DOI 10.1177/0887403408327381
[8]  
Carter D.L., 2009, Law enforcement intelligence: A guide for state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies, V2nd
[9]   THE INTELLIGENCE FUSION PROCESS FOR STATE, LOCAL, AND TRIBAL LAW ENFORCEMENT [J].
Carter, David L. ;
Carter, Jeremy G. .
CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2009, 36 (12) :1323-1339
[10]  
Carter J. G., 2013, POLICING SOC