Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using Anterior Chamber Depth from Two Devices with Barrett Universal II Formula

被引:6
|
作者
Castro, Hannah Muniz [1 ]
Tai, Audrey X. [2 ]
Sampson, Samuel J. [3 ]
Wade, Matthew [2 ]
Farid, Marjan [2 ]
Garg, Sumit [2 ]
机构
[1] UT Hlth Sci Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Gavin Herbert Eye Inst, UC Irvine Dept Ophthalmol, Irvine, CA USA
[3] Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
PARTIAL COHERENCE INTERFEROMETRY; OPTICAL BIOMETRY DEVICE; IOLMASTER;
D O I
10.1155/2019/8172615
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. To compare the preoperative measurements of the anterior chamber depth (ACD) by the IOLMaster and Catalys; additionally, to compare the accuracy of the IOL power calculated by the Barrett Universal II formula using the two different measurements. Setting. University of California, Irvine, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute in Irvine, California. Design. Retrospective comparative study. Methods. This study included 144 eyes of 90 patients with a mean age of 72.0 years (range 40.8 to 92.1 years) that underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery using Catalys. Preoperative measurements of ACD were taken by the IOLMaster and Catalys. Manifest refraction and refractive spherical equivalent were measured 1 month postoperatively. Expected refractive results were compared with actual postoperative refractive results. Results. The correlation between the ACD values from the two devices was good (r = 0.80). The Catalys ACD measurements yielded a larger ACD compared to the IOLMaster, with a mean difference of 0.22 mm (P < 0.0001). The correlation between the postoperative and predicted RSE of the implanted IOL power was excellent (r = 0.96). There was no statistically significant difference between the mean absolute error derived from the IOLMaster, 0.37 diopter (D) +/- 0.34 (SD), and the Catalys, 0.37 +/- 0.35 D (P = 0.50). Conclusions. The Catalys biometry yielded a significantly larger ACD value than the IOLMaster. This difference in ACD value, however, did not reflect in a statistically significant difference in IOL power calculation and refractive prediction error using the Barrett Universal II Formula.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Improving Accuracy of In-The-Bag Intraocular Lens Power Calculation in Adult Eyes with Unilateral Subluxated Lenses by Using the Anterior Chamber Depth of the Unaffected Eye
    Lou, Wei
    Chen, Ziang
    Huang, Yang
    Jin, Haiying
    OPHTHALMIC RESEARCH, 2024, 67 (01) : 248 - 256
  • [22] Accuracy of 8 intraocular lens calculation formulas in relation to anterior chamber depth in patients with normal axial lengths
    Gokce, Sabite Emine
    De Oca, Ildamaris Montes
    Cooke, David L.
    Wang, Li
    Koch, Douglas D.
    Al-Mohtaseb, Zaina
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 44 (03): : 362 - 368
  • [23] Accuracy of 11 intraocular lens calculation formulas in shallow anterior chamber eyes
    Yuan, Haorui
    Zhang, Jiaqing
    Han, Xiaotong
    Ye, Jinfeng
    Huang, Yiguo
    Huang, Ruoxuan
    Wen, Ling
    Qiu, Xiaozhang
    Chen, Xiaoyun
    Chen, Kailin
    Tan, Xuhua
    Luo, Lixia
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2024, 102 (05) : e705 - e711
  • [24] Comparing the Accuracy of the Kane, Barrett Universal II, Hill-Radial Basis Function, Emmetropia Verifying Optical, and Ladas Super Formula Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas
    Moshirfar, Majid
    Sulit, Christian A.
    Brown, Alex H.
    Irwin, Chase
    Ronquillo, Yasmyne C.
    Hoopes, Phillip C.
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 17 : 2643 - 2652
  • [25] Intraocular lens power calculation formula accuracy: Comparison of 12 formulas for a trifocal hydrophilic intraocular lens
    Rocha-de-Lossada, Carlos
    Colmenero-Reina, Elvira
    Flikier, David
    Castro-Alonso, Francisco-Javier
    Rodriguez-Raton, Alvaro
    Garcia-Madrona, Jose-Luis
    Peraza-Nieves, Jorge
    Sanchez-Gonzalez, Jose-Maria
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 31 (06) : 2981 - 2988
  • [26] Effect of Lens Vault on the Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas in Shallow Anterior Chamber Eyes
    Yan, Chenxi
    Yao, Ke
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 233 : 57 - 67
  • [27] Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with extreme myopia: Comparison of Barrett Universal II, Haigis, and Olsen formulas
    Rong, Xianfang
    He, Wenwen
    Zhu, Qian
    Qian, Dongjin
    Lu, Yi
    Zhu, Xiangjia
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 45 (06): : 732 - 737
  • [28] Accuracy of the Barrett Universal II formula integrated into a commercially available optical biometer when using a preloaded single-piece intraocular lens
    Mieno, Hiroki
    Hieda, Osamu
    Ikeda, Toshihide
    Hayashi, Shino
    Hashida, Masatsugu
    Urabe, Kimiaki
    Sotozono, Chie
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 69 (09) : 2298 - 2302
  • [29] Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Prediction Using 9 Formula
    Kim, Kyung Wook
    Yi, Kayoung
    Shin, Young Joo
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 65 (01): : 16 - 26
  • [30] COMPARISON OF INTRAOCULAR LENS CALCULATION RESULTS WITH BARRETT UNIVERSAL II FORMULA VS. KANE FORMULA VS, INTRAOPERATIVE ABERROMETRI WITH ORA® SYSTEM
    Leon Valle, Anne
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2023, 64 (08)