Is there a role for prophylactic mesh in abdominal wall closure after emergency laparotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:23
作者
Burns, F. A. [1 ]
Heywood, E. G. [1 ]
Challand, C. P. [1 ]
Lee, Matthew J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sheffield Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Acad Dept Gen Surg, Sheffield S5 7AU, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Sch Med, Dept Oncol & Metab, Sheffield S10 2RX, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
Incisional hernia; Emergency laparotomy; HIGH-RISK PATIENTS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PREVENT INCISIONAL HERNIA; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; POLYPROPYLENE MESH; MIDLINE LAPAROTOMY; SYNTHETIC MESH; PRIMARY SUTURE; DOUBLE-BLIND; IMPLANTATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10029-019-02060-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Incisional hernias are a common complication of emergency laparotomy and are associated with significant morbidity. Recent studies have found a reduction in incisional hernias when mesh is placed prophylactically during abdominal closure in elective laparotomies. This systematic review will assess the safety and efficacy of prophylactic mesh placement in emergency laparotomy. Methods A systematic review was performed according to the PROSPERO registered protocol (CRD42018109283). Papers were dual screened for eligibility, and included when a comparison was made between closure with prophylactic mesh and closure with a standard technique, reported using a comparative design (i.e. case-control, cohort or randomised trial), where the primary outcome was incisional hernia. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias in non-randomised studies tool. A meta-analysis of incisional hernia rate was performed to estimate risk ratio using a random effects model (Mantel-Haenszel approach). Results 332 studies were screened for eligibility, 29 full texts were reviewed and 2 non-randomised studies were included. Both studies were biased due to confounding factors, as closure technique was based on patient risk factors for incisional hernia. Both studies found significantly fewer incisional hernias in the mesh groups [3.2% vs 28.6% (p < 0.001) and 5.9% vs 33.3% (p = 0.0001)]. A meta-analysis of incisional hernia risk favoured prophylactic mesh closure [risk ratio 0.15 (95% CI 0.6-0.35, p < 0.001)]. Neither study found an association between mesh and infection or enterocutaneous fistula. Conclusion This review found that there are limited data to assess the effect or safety profile of prophylactic mesh in the emergency laparotomy setting. The current data cannot reliably assess the use of mesh due to confounding factors, and a randomised controlled trial is required to address this important clinical question.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 447
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Ahn Byung-Kwon, 2012, J Korean Soc Coloproctol, V28, P280, DOI 10.3393/jksc.2012.28.6.280
[2]   Randomized Controlled Trial of the Use of a Large-pore Polypropylene Mesh to Prevent Incisional Hernia in Colorectal Surgery [J].
Angel Garcia-Urena, Miguel ;
Lopez-Monclus, Javier ;
Blazquez Hernando, Luis Alberto ;
Melero Montes, Daniel ;
Robin Valle de Lersundi, Alvaro ;
Castellon Pavon, Camilo ;
Jimenez Ceinos, Carmen ;
Lopez Quindos, Patricia .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 261 (05) :876-881
[3]   The use of an algorithm for prophylactic mesh use in high risk patients reduces the incidence of incisional hernia following laparotomy for colorectal cancer resection [J].
Argudo, Nuria ;
Pilar Iskra, M. ;
Pera, Miguel ;
Sancho, Juan J. ;
Grande, Luis ;
Lopez-Cano, Manuel ;
Antonio Pereira, Jose .
CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2017, 95 (04) :222-228
[4]   Prophylactic synthetic mesh can be safely used to close emergency laparotomies, even in peritonitis [J].
Argudo, Nuria ;
Pereira, Jose A. ;
Sancho, Juan J. ;
Membrilla, Estela ;
Pons, M. Jose ;
Grande, Luis .
SURGERY, 2014, 156 (05) :1238-1244
[5]   Does prophylactic mesh placement in elective, midline laparotomy reduce the incidence of incisional hernia? A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Borab, Zachary M. ;
Shakir, Sameer ;
Lanni, Michael A. ;
Tecce, Michael G. ;
MacDonald, John ;
Hope, William W. ;
Fischer, John P. .
SURGERY, 2017, 161 (04) :1149-1163
[6]   POLYPROPYLENE MESH CLOSURE AFTER EMERGENCY LAPAROTOMY - MORBIDITY AND OUTCOME [J].
BRANDT, CP ;
MCHENRY, CR ;
JACOBS, DG ;
PIOTROWSKI, JJ ;
PRIEBE, PP .
SURGERY, 1995, 118 (04) :736-741
[7]   RETRACTED: Impact on Quality of Life of Using an Onlay Mesh to Prevent Incisional Hernia in Midline Laparotomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial (Retracted article. See vol. 220, pg. 126, 2015) [J].
Caro-Tarrago, Aleidis ;
Olona-Casas, Carles ;
Olona-Cabases, Montserrat ;
Vicente Guillen, Vicente .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2014, 219 (03) :470-479
[8]  
de la Portilla Fernando, 2008, Cir Esp, V83, P12
[9]   Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial [J].
Deerenberg, Eva B. ;
Harlaar, Joris J. ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Lont, Harold E. ;
van Doorn, Helena C. ;
Heisterkamp, Joos ;
Wijnhoven, Bas P. L. ;
Schouten, Willem R. ;
Cense, Huib A. ;
Stockmann, Hein B. A. C. ;
Berends, Frits J. ;
Dijkhuizen, F. Paul H. L. J. ;
Dwarkasing, Roy S. ;
Jairam, An P. ;
van Ramshorst, Gabrielle H. ;
Kleinrensink, Gert-Jan ;
Jeekel, Johannes ;
Lange, Johan F. .
LANCET, 2015, 386 (10000) :1254-1260
[10]  
DUMANIAN G, 2016, 17 ANN HERNIA REPAIR, P1