Topological keystone species complexes in ecological interaction networks

被引:26
|
作者
Benedek, Z. [1 ]
Jordan, F.
Baldi, A.
机构
[1] Eotvos Lorand Univ, Dept Plant Taxonomy & Ecol, Budapest, Hungary
[2] Collegium Budapest, Inst Adv Study, Budapest, Hungary
[3] Hungarian Nat Hist Museum, Hungarian Acad Sci, Anim Ecol Res Grp, Budapest, Hungary
关键词
indirect effects; keystone species; network analysis; pollinators; topology;
D O I
10.1556/ComEc.8.2007.1.1
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Advanced techniques of network analysis allow the quantification of the indirect interactions and the topological importance of components in ecological interaction networks. In current conservation biology, considering indirect causal effects, identifying keystone species and outlining multispecies approaches begin to be high priority goals. We make an attempt to connect these issues within a network context. Our main interest is to determine the positionally most important set of n nodes in a network, to analyse whether a set of nodes for small n is a subset of another for larger n, and to quantify this nestedness. We apply the KeyPlayer software, a novel tool for network analysis in ecology, introduced originally in mathematical sociology. Topological keystone species complexes are defined, we illustrate the use of this method in a case study and analyse a database of 9 plant-pollinator interaction networks. Our main conclusion is that multispecies approaches may give results very different from single species analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Topological keystone species:: measures of positional importance in food webs
    Jordán, F
    Liu, WC
    Davis, AJ
    OIKOS, 2006, 112 (03) : 535 - 546
  • [12] Identification of Keystone Species in Ecological Communities in the East China Sea
    Wang, Yin
    Kindong, Richard
    Gao, Chunxia
    Wang, Jiaqi
    FISHES, 2023, 8 (05)
  • [13] Wild reindeer as a keystone cultural and ecological species in the Eurasian north
    Mustonen, Tero
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2022, 28 (14) : 4225 - 4228
  • [14] Ecological dominants vs. keystone species: A call for reason
    Davic, RD
    CONSERVATION ECOLOGY, 2000, 4 (01):
  • [15] Food Web Topology and Nested Keystone Species Complexes
    Capocefalo, Daniele
    Pereira, Juliana
    Mazza, Tommaso
    Jordan, Ferenc
    COMPLEXITY, 2018,
  • [16] Tripartite networks show that keystone species can multitask
    Timoteo, Sergio
    Albrecht, Jorg
    Rumeu, Beatriz
    Norte, Ana C.
    Traveset, Anna
    Frost, Carol M.
    Marchante, Elizabete
    Lopez-Nunez, Francisco A.
    Peralta, Guadalupe
    Memmott, Jane
    Olesen, Jens M.
    Costa, Jose M.
    da Silva, Luis P.
    Carvalheiro, Luisa G.
    Correia, Marta
    Staab, Michael
    Bluthgen, Nico
    Farwig, Nina
    Hervias-Parejo, Sandra
    Mironov, Sergei
    Rodriguez-Echeverria, Susana
    Heleno, Ruben
    FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2023, 37 (02) : 274 - 286
  • [17] Scaling up keystone effects from simple to complex ecological networks
    Brose, U
    Berlow, EL
    Martinez, ND
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2005, 8 (12) : 1317 - 1325
  • [18] Linking Topological Structure and Dynamics in Ecological Networks
    Alcantara, Julio M.
    Rey, Pedro J.
    AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2012, 180 (02): : 186 - 199
  • [19] Beyond species: why ecological interaction networks vary through space and time
    Poisot, Timothee
    Stouffer, Daniel B.
    Gravel, Dominique
    OIKOS, 2015, 124 (03) : 243 - 251
  • [20] Inference of ecological interaction networks
    Vera-Licona, Paola
    Laubenbacher, Reinhard
    ANNALES ZOOLOGICI FENNICI, 2008, 45 (05) : 459 - 464