Life cycle cost analysis of wastewater treatment: A systematic review of literature

被引:54
作者
Ilyas, Muhammad [1 ]
Kassa, Freselam Mulubrhan [1 ]
Darun, Mohd Ridzuan [1 ]
Klemes, Jiri Jaromir [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaysia, Fac Ind Management, Pahang, Malaysia
关键词
Economic assessment; Lifecycle cost analysis; Life cycle assessment; Systematic literature review; Cost breakdown structure; Uncertainty; ANAEROBIC MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; DECISION-SUPPORT TOOL; ENERGY RECOVERY; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEMS; RESOURCE RECOVERY; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES; TREATMENT PLANTS; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127549
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The last two decades have witnessed a substantial increase in literature on the life cycle costing of Wastewater treatment. Lack of commonly agreed methodology of life cycle costing resulted in the use of different frameworks and methodologies. Methods and approaches in conducting life cycle cost analysis are also evolving, and a gradual shift from conventional to environmental and societal life cycle costing is witnessed in the last decade. However, a detailed systematic review of methods and approaches of life cycle costing in Wastewater treatment is still lacking. A comprehensive and systematic review provides an opportunity to record existing development in the field and identify areas where more research is needed. For this purpose, this paper systematically reviews the literature on the life cycle cost analysis of wastewater treatment, focusing on purpose, approach, methodology, integration with life cycle assessment, cost estimation, and dealing with uncertainty. The analysis of 83 identified case studies indicated that most of the studies are conducting for affordability and comparative analysis. A gradual shift from conventional to environmental life cycle cost analysis is also observed. 44% of the studies are integrated with Life cycle assessment through different methods. However, in these integrated studies, life cycle cost analysis is used as a secondary tool to supplement the life cycle assessment. Analytical and statistical methods are generally used for cost estimation. Deterministic methods are most common to deal with uncertainties. Based on the comprehensive review of case studies, it is suggested that future research should aim at developing a framework for life cycle cost analysis that could consider and allocate all costs associated with the Wastewater treatment process.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]   Techno-economic and environmental assessment of wastewater management systems: Life cycle approach [J].
Abdallah, Mohamed ;
Shanableh, Abdallah ;
Elshazly, Doha ;
Feroz, Sainab .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2020, 82
[2]   Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies [J].
Adams, Richard J. ;
Smart, Palie ;
Huff, Anne Sigismund .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2017, 19 (04) :432-454
[3]   Sustainability assessment of wastewater reuse alternatives using the evidential reasoning approach [J].
Akhoundi, Ali ;
Nazif, Sara .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 195 :1350-1376
[4]  
Altarabsheh A, 2016, CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2016: OLD AND NEW CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES CONVERGE IN HISTORIC SAN JUAN, P2089
[5]  
Ambre H., 2019, JOWPPR, V3, P25
[6]   Designing a small-scale infra-free (IF) system for community applications: Managing energy, water and waste [J].
Anilir, Serkan ;
Nelson, Mark ;
Allen, John .
JOURNAL OF ASIAN ARCHITECTURE AND BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2008, 7 (01) :77-84
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2001, UNDERTAKING SYSTEMAT
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ISO 15686 52017 BUIL
[9]   'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review [J].
Armstrong, Rebecca ;
Hall, Belinda J. ;
Doyle, Jodie ;
Waters, Elizabeth .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 33 (01) :147-150
[10]  
Barringer H. P., 1995, 4 INT C PROC PLANT R