Multiple-use management of forest recreation sites: a spatially explicit choice experiment

被引:118
作者
Horne, P
Boxall, PC
Adamowicz, WL
机构
[1] Finnish Forest Res Inst, FIN-00170 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Rural Econ, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada
关键词
biodiversity; choice experiment; forest management; recreation;
D O I
10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.026
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
This study examined visitors' preferences for forest management at five adjacent municipal recreation sites in Finland, using a spatially explicit choice experiment. The study design accounted for changes in scenery and biodiversity indices in the forest environment resulting from forest management practices. Respondents were asked to choose their preferred management option from alternative management regimes for the sites. The options were characterized by different levels of attributes, which included site-specific species richness levels and forest scenery, costs of management, and indicators of species richness levels over the system of recreation sites. Results show that visitors have a strong preference for the preservation of species richness and for scenic beauty. However, when there is a trade-off between these benefits, visitors chose their favourite scenery at their favourite recreation site and prefer management options, which preserve biodiversity at the other sites in the recreation system. The study shows how modelling the sites as independent units of the forest management regime permit policy-relevant conclusions to be drawn regarding the specialisation and zoning of multiple-use objectives. The approach also allows for the development of hypothetical management scenarios and estimation of respective economic welfare changes for visitors from these scenarios. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 199
页数:11
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation [J].
Adamowicz, W ;
Swait, J ;
Boxall, P ;
Louviere, J ;
Williams, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 32 (01) :65-84
[2]   Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation [J].
Adamowicz, W ;
Boxall, P ;
Williams, M ;
Louviere, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (01) :64-75
[3]   Spatial non-timber valuation decision support systems [J].
Akabua, KM ;
Adamowicz, WL ;
Boxall, PC .
FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 2000, 76 (02) :319-327
[4]  
[Anonymous], MULTIPLE USE FORESTR
[5]  
[Anonymous], COMMUN I FOR FENN
[6]  
Ben-Akiva M., 1985, Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand
[7]   Exploring the preferences of wildlife recreationists for features of boreal forest management: a choice experiment approach [J].
Boxall, PC ;
Macnab, B .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 2000, 30 (12) :1931-1941
[8]   A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation [J].
Boxall, PC ;
Adamowicz, WL ;
Swait, J ;
Williams, M ;
Louviere, J .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 18 (03) :243-253
[9]   Do hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay differ in choice experiments? Application to the valuation of the environment [J].
Carlsson, F ;
Martinsson, P .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2001, 41 (02) :179-192
[10]  
Carson R.T., 1994, MARKET LETT, V5, P351, DOI [10.1007/BF00999210, DOI 10.1007/BF00999210]