Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) downstream signalling pathway in primary colorectal tumours and related metastatic sites: optimising EGFR-targeted treatment options

被引:36
|
作者
Scartozzi, M.
Bearzi, I.
Berardi, R.
Mandolesi, A.
Pierantoni, C.
Cascinu, S.
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Marche, Azienda Osped Osped Riuniti, Clin Oncol Med, I-60020 Ancona, Italy
[2] Univ Politecn Marche, Azienda Osped Osped Riuniti, Ist Anat Patol, I-60020 Ancona, Italy
关键词
EGFR downstream signalling pathway; phosphorylated Akt; phosphorylated MAPK; anti-EGFR treatment options; colorectal tumours;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6603847
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We analysed the expression of activated (phosphorylated) Akt and MAPK in 98 cases of paired primary colorectal tumours and metastases with the aim to define better the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-related molecular profile of colorectal cancer as a tool for treatment selection. Among 47 (48%) EGFR-negative primary tumours, 35 cases (74%) were positive for phosphorylated Akt and MAPK. Among 51 (52%) EGFR-positive primary colorectal cancers, 13 (25%) cases were negative for phosphorylated Akt and 15 (29%) were negative for phosphorylated MAPK. In EGFR-negative metastases (56 cases, 55%), phosphorylated Akt was expressed in 41 (73%) and phosphorylated MAPK was expressed in 36 (64%) samples, whereas in EGFR-positive metastases, phosphorylated Akt and MAPK were negative in 14 (31%) and in 10 (22%) cases, respectively. Phosphorylated Akt expression in primary colorectal tumours changed from positive to negative in 16 (16%) paired metastases and from negative to positive in 13 (13%) related metastatic sites. Phosphorylated MAPK expression in primary tumours changed from positive to negative in 13 (13%) paired metastases and from negative to positive in 12 (12%) related metastatic sites. Our findings suggest that phosphorylated Akt and MAPK status in primary tumours does not correlate with Akt and MAPK status in corresponding metastases. EGFR downstream signalling pathway can be overactivated even in the absence of EGFR expression in a considerable proportion of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 97
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-targeted Photoimmunotherapy (PIT) for the Treatment of EGFR-expressing Bladder Cancer
    Railkar, Reema
    Krane, L. Spencer
    Li, Q. Quentin
    Sanford, Thomas
    Siddiqui, Mohammad Rashid
    Haines, Diana
    Vourganti, Srinivas
    Brancato, Sam J.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Kobayashi, Hisataka
    Agarwal, Piyush K.
    MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 16 (10) : 2201 - 2214
  • [22] Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) targeted photoimmunotherapy (PIT) for the treatment of EGFR expressing bladder cancer.
    Railkar, Reema
    Krane, Spencer
    Li, Q. Quentin
    Sanford, Thomas
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Kobayashi, Hisataka
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (06)
  • [23] Heterogeneity of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression and variation in immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing may affect access to EGFR-targeted therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC).
    Beer, M. W.
    Ung, C.
    Bacus, S. S.
    McCollum, A. D.
    Ervin-Haynes, A.
    Schinagl, R.
    Youssoufian, H.
    Rowinsky, E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (18) : 566S - 566S
  • [24] Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway activation in biliary carcinoma. Molecular basis for the development of EGFR targeted therapies
    Pignochino, Y.
    Leone, F.
    Cavalloni, G.
    Sarotto, I
    Penachioni, J.
    Zanon, C.
    Panero, P.
    Piacibello, W.
    Risio, M.
    Bardelli, A.
    Aglietta, M.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2007, 18 : VII60 - VII60
  • [25] Differing deregulation of EGFR and downstream proteins in primary colorectal cancer and related metastatic sites may be clinically relevant
    Molinari, F.
    Martin, V.
    Saletti, P.
    De Dosso, S.
    Spitale, A.
    Camponovo, A.
    Bordoni, A.
    Crippa, S.
    Mazzucchelli, L.
    Frattini, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 100 (07) : 1087 - 1094
  • [26] Differing deregulation of EGFR and downstream proteins in primary colorectal cancer and related metastatic sites may be clinically relevant
    F Molinari
    V Martin
    P Saletti
    S De Dosso
    A Spitale
    A Camponovo
    A Bordoni
    S Crippa
    L Mazzucchelli
    M Frattini
    British Journal of Cancer, 2009, 100 : 1087 - 1094
  • [27] Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and KRAS mutations during chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Tougeron D.
    Cortes U.
    Ferru A.
    Villalva C.
    Silvain C.
    Tourani J.M.
    Levillain P.
    Karayan-Tapon L.
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2013, 72 (2) : 397 - 403
  • [28] Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) density may not be the only determinant for the efficacy of EGFR-targeted photoimmunotherapy in human head and neck cancer cell lines
    Peng, Wei
    de Bruijn, Henriette S.
    Farrell, Eric
    Sioud, Mouldy
    Mashayekhi, Vida
    Oliveira, Sabrina
    van Dam, Go M.
    Roodenburg, Jan L. N.
    Witjes, Max J. H.
    Robinson, Dominic J.
    LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 2018, 50 (05) : 513 - 522
  • [29] Neoadjuvant Therapies Do Not Reduce Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Expression or EGFR-Targeted Fluorescence in a Murine Model of Soft-Tissue Sarcomas
    Streeter, Samuel S.
    Xu, Xiaochun
    Hebert, Kendra A.
    Werth, Paul M.
    Hoopes, P. Jack
    Jarvis, Lesley A.
    Pogue, Brian W.
    Paulsen, Keith D.
    Samkoe, Kimberley S.
    Henderson, Eric R.
    MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY, 2024, 26 (02) : 240 - 252
  • [30] Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status in different stages of resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Implications for treatment with EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies
    Squadroni, Michela
    Berardi, Rossana
    Scartozzi, Mario
    Santinelli, Alfredo
    Verdecchia, Lorena
    Valeri, Gianluca
    Gasparini, Stefano
    Marmorale, Cristina
    Fianchini, Aroldo
    Cascinu, Stefano
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 : 252 - 252