RETIREMENT AND DEATH IN OFFICE OF US SUPREME COURT JUSTICES

被引:15
|
作者
Stolzenberg, Ross M. [1 ]
Lindgren, James [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Sociol, 1126 E 59th St, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Sch Law, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
SAMPLE SELECTION BIAS; SELF-RATED HEALTH; POISSON-DISTRIBUTION; FEDERAL-COURTS; LABOR-MARKETS; LIFE-TABLES; MORTALITY; MODELS; LONGEVITY; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1353/dem.0.0100
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
We construct demographic models of retirement and death in office of U.S. Supreme Court justices, a group that has gained demographic notice, evaded demographic analysis, and is said to diverge from expected retirement patterns. Models build on prior multistate labor force status studies, and data permit an unusually clear distinction between voluntary and "induced" retirement. Using data on every justice from 1789 through 2006, with robust, cluster-corrected, discrete-tune, censored, event-history methods, we (1) estimate retirement effects of pension eligibility, age, health, and tenure on the timing of justices' retirements and deaths in office, (2) resolve decades of debate over the politicized departure hypothesis that justices tend to alter the timing of their retirements for the political benefit or detriment of the incumbent president, (3) reconsider the nature of rationality in retirement decisions, and (4) consider the relevance of organizational conditions as well as personal circumstances to retirement decisions. Methodological issues are addressed.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 298
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Triaging the Law: Developing the Common Law on the Supreme Court of India
    Green, Andrew
    Yoon, Albert H.
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUDIES, 2017, 14 (04) : 683 - 715
  • [42] Death and Us
    Kaye, Howard L.
    SOCIETY, 2009, 46 (03) : 237 - 239
  • [43] Addressing Ill Health: Sickness and Retirement in the Victorian Post Office
    Green, David R.
    Brown, Douglas H. L.
    Mcilvenna, Kathleen
    SOCIAL HISTORY OF MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (02) : 559 - 585
  • [44] Group Identification and Support for the Supreme Court: Evidence from Evangelical Protestants
    Kromphardt, Christopher D.
    Starling, Anderson M.
    Smith, Joseph L.
    JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF RELIGION, 2019, : 854 - 873
  • [45] EXTREME DISSENSUS: EXPLAINING PLURALITY DECISIONS ON THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
    Corley, Pamela C.
    Sommer, Udi
    Steigerwalt, Amy
    Ward, Artemus
    JUSTICE SYSTEM JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (02) : 180 - 200
  • [46] DE FACTO SUPREMACY: SUPREME COURT CONTROL OF STATE COMMERCIAL LAW
    Hurst, J. Benton
    VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, 2012, 98 (03) : 691 - 728
  • [47] Extra-judicial Actor Induced Change in Supreme Court Legitimacy
    Armaly, Miles T.
    POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2018, 71 (03) : 600 - 613
  • [48] Assessing randomness in case assignment: the case study of the Brazilian Supreme Court
    Marcondes, Diego
    Peixoto, Claudia
    Stern, Julio Michael
    LAW PROBABILITY & RISK, 2019, 18 (2-3) : 97 - 114
  • [49] Ideological Determinants of Citations to Supreme Court Precedent Across the Federal Judiciary
    Salam, Amna
    JOURNAL OF LAW AND COURTS, 2023, 11 (01) : 1 - 24
  • [50] A Plea for Caution: Violent Video Games, the Supreme Court, and the Role of Science
    Hall, Ryan C. W.
    Day, Terri
    Hall, Richard C. W.
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2011, 86 (04) : 315 - 321