Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence

被引:163
作者
Reali, Florencia [1 ]
Christiansen, Morten H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Psychol, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
sentence processing; relative clauses; distributional information; corpus analysis; constraint-based approaches;
D O I
10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.014
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
We conducted a large-scale corpus analysis indicating that pronominal object relative clauses are significantly more frequent than pronominal subject relative clauses when the embedded pronoun is personal. This difference was reversed when impersonal pronouns constituted the embedded noun phrase. This pattern of distribution provides a suitable framework for testing the role of experience in sentence processing: if frequency of exposure influences processing difficulty, highly frequent pronominal object relatives should be easier to process but only when a personal pronoun is in the embedded position. We tested this hypothesis experimentally: We conducted four self-paced reading tasks, which indicated that differences in pronominal object/subject relative processing mirrored the pattern of distribution revealed by the corpus analysis. We discuss the results in the light of current theories of sentence comprehension. We conclude that object relative processing is facilitated by frequency of the embedded clause, and, more generally, that statistical information should be taken into account by theories of relative clause processing. (C) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 23
页数:23
相关论文
共 74 条
[31]   Memory-load interference in syntactic processing [J].
Gordon, PC ;
Hendrick, R ;
Levine, WH .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 13 (05) :425-430
[32]   Memory interference during language processing [J].
Gordon, PC ;
Hendrick, R ;
Johnson, M .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2001, 27 (06) :1411-1423
[33]   Consequences of the serial nature of linguistic input for sentenial complexity [J].
Grodner, D ;
Gibson, E .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2005, 29 (02) :261-290
[34]   COGNITIVE STATUS AND THE FORM OF REFERRING EXPRESSIONS IN DISCOURSE [J].
GUNDEL, JK ;
HEDBERG, N ;
ZACHARSKI, R .
LANGUAGE, 1993, 69 (02) :274-307
[35]   EYE FIXATION PATTERNS DURING THE READING OF RELATIVE-CLAUSE SENTENCES [J].
HOLMES, VM ;
OREGAN, JK .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1981, 20 (04) :417-430
[36]   Processing relative clauses in Chinese [J].
Hsiao, F ;
Gibson, E .
COGNITION, 2003, 90 (01) :3-27
[37]  
Jurafsky D, 1996, COGNITIVE SCI, V20, P137, DOI 10.1207/s15516709cog2002_1
[38]   PARADIGMS AND PROCESSES IN READING-COMPREHENSION [J].
JUST, MA ;
CARPENTER, PA ;
WOOLLEY, JD .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1982, 111 (02) :228-238
[39]   INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN SYNTACTIC PROCESSING - THE ROLE OF WORKING MEMORY [J].
KING, J ;
JUST, MA .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1991, 30 (05) :580-602
[40]  
KONIECZNY L, 2005, P 27 ANN C COGN SCI