On the Methodology of Studying Differentiated (Dis)integration: Or How the Potential Outcome Framework Can Contribute to Evaluating the Costs and Benefits of Opting In or Out

被引:11
作者
Burk, Marian [1 ]
Leuffen, Dirk [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Konstanz, Constance, Germany
关键词
differentiated (dis)integration; potential outcomes framework; synthetic control method; economic and monetary union; European integration; UNITED-KINGDOM; EUROPEAN-UNION; INTEGRATION; JOIN; MEMBERSHIP; BREXIT; WORK;
D O I
10.1111/jcms.12958
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The European Commission's 2017 White Paper on the Future of Europe sets out several scenarios related to differentiated (dis)integration. But although our understanding of the causes of differentiated (dis)integration has substantively improved over recent years, our knowledge about its consequences still remains limited. This shortcoming may lead to difficulties when it comes to formulating policy recommendations. Accordingly, we propose closer attention to the effects-of-causes of differentiated (dis)integration, linked to a more careful implementation of insights on causal inference. After briefly reviewing the foci and methods of existing literature on differentiated (dis)integration, we introduce a potential outcome model of causal inference. We provide an illustrative application of the synthetic control method, as one method related to this framework. Our analysis shows that the UK has economically benefitted from not joining the eurozone, but our argument more generally is about the practical implications of methodological choices in the study of differentiated (dis)integration.
引用
收藏
页码:1395 / 1406
页数:12
相关论文
共 56 条
[11]   Why the United Kingdom Should Join the Eurozone [J].
Buiter, Willem H. .
INTERNATIONAL FINANCE, 2008, 11 (03) :269-282
[12]   Presidential Address: Will This Policy Work for You? Predicting Effectiveness Better: How Philosophy Helps [J].
Cartwright, Nancy .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2012, 79 (05) :973-989
[13]  
Cartwright Nancy., 2011, Causality in the Sciences
[14]  
Dahrendorf R., 1979, 3 EUROPE
[15]  
Demertzis M., 2018, POLICY BRIEF ISSUE 3
[16]  
Duttle T., 2016, DIFFERENTIATED INTEG
[17]   Opting out from European Union legislation: the differentiation of secondary law [J].
Duttle, Thomas ;
Holzinger, Katharina ;
Malang, Thomas ;
Schaubli, Thomas ;
Schimmelfennig, Frank ;
Winzen, Thomas .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2017, 24 (03) :406-428
[18]  
Dyson K, 2010, PALGRAVE STUD EUR UN, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230289529
[19]  
EC, 2017, WHITE PAPER FUTURE E
[20]  
European Parliament, 2019, 20182093INI EUR PARL