On the Methodology of Studying Differentiated (Dis)integration: Or How the Potential Outcome Framework Can Contribute to Evaluating the Costs and Benefits of Opting In or Out

被引:11
作者
Burk, Marian [1 ]
Leuffen, Dirk [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Konstanz, Constance, Germany
关键词
differentiated (dis)integration; potential outcomes framework; synthetic control method; economic and monetary union; European integration; UNITED-KINGDOM; EUROPEAN-UNION; INTEGRATION; JOIN; MEMBERSHIP; BREXIT; WORK;
D O I
10.1111/jcms.12958
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The European Commission's 2017 White Paper on the Future of Europe sets out several scenarios related to differentiated (dis)integration. But although our understanding of the causes of differentiated (dis)integration has substantively improved over recent years, our knowledge about its consequences still remains limited. This shortcoming may lead to difficulties when it comes to formulating policy recommendations. Accordingly, we propose closer attention to the effects-of-causes of differentiated (dis)integration, linked to a more careful implementation of insights on causal inference. After briefly reviewing the foci and methods of existing literature on differentiated (dis)integration, we introduce a potential outcome model of causal inference. We provide an illustrative application of the synthetic control method, as one method related to this framework. Our analysis shows that the UK has economically benefitted from not joining the eurozone, but our argument more generally is about the practical implications of methodological choices in the study of differentiated (dis)integration.
引用
收藏
页码:1395 / 1406
页数:12
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the Basque Country
    Abadie, A
    Gardeazabal, J
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (01) : 113 - 132
  • [2] Comparative Politics and the Synthetic Control Method
    Abadie, Alberto
    Diamond, Alexis
    Hainmueller, Jens
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 59 (02) : 495 - 510
  • [3] Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California's Tobacco Control Program
    Abadie, Alberto
    Diamond, Alexis
    Hainmueller, Jens
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 105 (490) : 493 - 505
  • [4] Behind the scenes of differentiated integration: circumventing national opt-outs in Justice and Home Affairs
    Adler-Nissen, Rebecca
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2009, 16 (01) : 62 - 80
  • [5] Adler-Nissen Rebecca., 2014, Opting Out of the European Union: Diplomacy, Sovereignty and European Integration
  • [6] Andersen SveinS., 2006, Journal of European Integration, V28, P313, DOI DOI 10.1080/07036330600853919
  • [7] Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
  • [8] Beach DerekRasmus Brun Pedersen., 2013, PROCESS TRACING METH
  • [9] Bennett A, 2015, STRAT SOC INQ, P276
  • [10] Born B., 2016, COSTS EC NATL EVIDEN